]
Betreff: Re: [Samba] About SOCKET options
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote:
Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET
options.
In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] About SOCKET options
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That
might
have anything to do with it?
Just checked my docs for 2.2.5 claim that the default is large
readwrite = no. Maybe it's
recommend 8192 nowadays and not 4096. Why should 4096 be
faster for me? Am I a rare case (since everyone seems to recommend 8192)?
--
Benjamin Weber
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No
[bilder]
comment = Bilder
path = /home/benjamin//Bilder
valid users = benjamin
read only = No
--
Benjamin Weber
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org
PROTECTED]]Im
Auftrag von Benjamin Weber
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. September 2002 12:32
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [Samba] Slow browsing windows shares from linux/samba
Hello all
I have been searching around the internet and even used the searchable
samaba mailing list archive. It seems I have