On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:47 AM, sam...@nym.hush.com wrote:
I’d appreciate some pointers on what to do. I don’t want to have
the exact same users on the new Debian server (some of the users on
the Unix server have left) so was hoping to just create users and
groups manually rather than copy
You may want to look into using the Sernet packages instead of the
Debian ones, then you'll have an up-to-date Samba 3.6.16
installation.
Only problem I had was that I needed to add Samba to run level 2 as it
appears my CLI only install of Wheezy doesn't boot into run level 3
(as Debian claims is
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Only problem I had was that I needed to add Samba to run level 2 as it
appears my CLI only install of Wheezy doesn't boot into run level 3
(as Debian claims is their default).
Just read somewhere else the run level 2
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Lukasz Zalewski lu...@eecs.qmul.ac.uk wrote:
According to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/hh852373.aspx
Windows 8 should be able to use level 3 drivers, but it does not seem to
work for me.
Are they any workarounds that can be applied
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Lukasz Zalewski lu...@eecs.qmul.ac.uk wrote:
Thank you for this. Unfortunately i do not even get that far. Windows claims
that there is no driver found :(
Does the driver have to be installed manually?
I'm using the standard CUPS drivers. They work with all of
My blog has the method I've used for years:
http://blog.realcomputerguy.com/2010/12/samba-and-guest-shares-with-security.html
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 May 2013 12:42, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Maybe the map to guest option
Filed as bug 9847:
Customer, in the 3.6.x series, has run 3.6.10 through 3.6.13
successfully. After upgrading to 3.6.14 Winbind crashes and their data
is no longer accessible. Reverting to 3.6.13 brings back stability.
[2013/05/01 23:15:16.303789, 0]
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:24 PM, thomas t.macai...@beware.fr wrote:
Are you sure this is working ?
I tried it and it doesnt.
Yes, I have static entries that are still there from months ago.
I have winbind installed and can findsmb / smbtree .
pinging the NetBIOS names found by previous
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Macaigne t.macai...@beware.fr wrote:
I am trying to add static WINS entries in my Samba server, running on Ubuntu
server.
I read various forums and inputs on this mailing list mentionning the use of
wins.dat which is located at /var/lib/samba/wins.dat
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Jon Heese jhe...@co.weld.co.us wrote:
My next idea was to use Samba to create an anonymous share, and following
this quick-n-dirty HowTo:
http://www.debuntu.org/samba-how-to-share-files-for-your-lan-without-userpassword/,
I set up a Lucid Lynx box with samba
Is there a way to determine (or at least get close) what version of
Samba an embedded client may be running (or based on) via packet
sniffing (tcpdump, wireshark)?
Thanks.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Richard Sharpe
realrichardsha...@gmail.com wrote:
If they have not changed the version string to obscure the version,
then the following will work:
cc1# smbclient //some-node/some-share -U[some-dom/]some-user%some-password
Failed to load upcase.dat, will use
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
==
Native OS: Linux version 2.6.35
Native LAN Manager: CIFS VFS Client for Linux
==
It advertises these protocols
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
If I could change the subject somewhat, I am also not clear on how to
configure SAMBA4 and the DNS server if my network has an existing DNS
server on another machine and I don't really want to move it. The DNS
server is
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, TMason c.koe...@live.com wrote:
What I would like to do now is have different /etc/skel directories for
different groups. So, for example, if someone from the Finance department
logs in one set of default settings are copied for that person but if
someone from
Might be related to my bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9561
Unfortunately I'm not getting any traction on it. From my testing
there still hasn't, after 10 releases, been a fully usable 3.6.x and
now it's claimed to be in maintenance mode due to the release of
Samba 4.x, which I
Since there's only a couple of server systems on the network that
actually need name resolution or to be seen via NetBIOS browsing. Is
there any reason not to run a static only WINS server with just the
information for those systems listed? If not, then how can one stop
the other systems from
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
If your windows clients use login scripts to map drives, then they don't
need WINS at all, since they resolve hosts via DNS.
I think that WINS is necessary for the clients to find the Domain Controller.
However,
I'm not referring to Active Directory, the Domain Controller is a Samba 3 box.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
??? With Active Directory I'm pretty sure that happens via a DNS query
(or series of them).
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
Ubuntu AFAIK has never fixed their Bug 951087 which is one reason I
cannot recommend it as a server where Samba is a critical package.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Eitan Orgil eitan.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed an Ubuntu server 12.04.01 with Smba 3.6.3
I have configured it
Upgrading from 3.5.15 to 3.6.6 failed.
Looks a bit like Bug 8235:
[2012/07/04 09:02:38.341747, 0, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
lib/charcnv.c:543(convert_string_talloc)
Conversion error: Illegal multibyte sequence()
[2012/07/04
From the smbd.log level 10 log there is this:
=
[2012/07/04 10:41:28.146531, 5, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
printing/nt_printing_migrate_internal.c:54(rename_file_with_suffix)
moved '/var/lib/samba/ntdrivers.tdb' to '/var/lib/samba/ntdrivers.tdb.bak'
Thank you. Done. Bug 9026.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Just to note that ntprinters.tdb does not fail tdbbackup validation
and a backup/restore of it does not resolve the issue.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, David Disseldorp dd...@suse.de wrote:
ntdrivers.tdb is ok, it appears to be ntprinters.tdb which is processed
afterwards
--
To unsubscribe
This:
chgrp GRP\sales /opt/group/sales
chmod 0770 /opt/group/sales
if you already have a bunch of directories and files use find with
xargs to properly set the permissions
With this:
[sales]
Samba is throwing this when trying to build version 3.5.15:
===
Compiling ../nsswitch/pam_winbind.c
../nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function ‘_pam_parse’:
../nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:440:76: warning: comparison between pointer
and integer
Sorry, not an x86 vs. amd64 problem at all. My amd64 system had an
older iniparser.
Appears that this is an incompatibility with anything newer than
iniparser-3.0b which is apparently no longer available @
http://ndevilla.free.fr/.
The Samba build fails with both iniparser-3.0.0 and
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:27 PM, bakytn bak...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you recommend me to use IDMAP_RID with Winbind?
I use it successfully.
idmap backend = idmap_rid:DOMAIN=2000-1
Depending upon your Samba version the syntax may be a bit different.
idmap config DOMAIN : backend =
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:50 PM, bakytn bak...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried the old config and newer.
idmap backend = rid:DOMAIN=4000-2
idmap uid = 4000-2
idmap gid = 4000-2
Doesn't look right - man smb.conf - for the correct syntax. For your
version I think it should be more
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar
shirishpargaon...@gmail.com wrote:
printcap name = /etc/printcap
#obtain list of printers automatically on SystemV
; printcap name = lpstat
printing = cups
Have you tried:
printcap name = cups
?
I use it with
Hello,
I'm working on migrating an NT4 PDC to a Samba 3 PDC. The tricky part,
is that the NT4 server is also running Exchange 5.5 which needs to
remain running. So unlike a migrate and toss the NT4 system, I need to
migrate, then demote the NT4 PDC to an NT4 Server, then (probably)
rejoin the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Chris Weiss cwe...@gmail.com wrote:
to clarify, this sounds kind of like you are running exchange on the PDC?
Indeed.
you can't demote an NT4 PDC to a stand alone or member server, it
requires a re-install.
Officially, yes. In reality, no. Changing
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
So presumably you would use the net vampire command to extract all the
account info from the NT server. The samba server is then a BDC, you then
promote it to a PDC and make the NT server a BDC (or even a
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Mike Vallabh m...@waikato.ac.nz wrote:
What I haven't figured out (but have managed to work around) is that when
you install the driver via APW, it presents a list of Manufacturers and
Printer Models. If I do the above from a Win7 (32-bit) client everything
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Christ Schlacta li...@aarcane.org wrote:
Were you careful to install both the 32 and 64 bit printer drivers on the
samba server?
I think you're missing the point. Installing the drivers on the Samba
server is what we're trying to do :) Using the APW is a known,
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Bruno Martins bmart...@galileu.pt wrote:
[formacao]
comment = Partilha Formacao
path = /home/joe/Formacao
guest ok = yes
browseable = yes
read only = no
write list = bmartins, amoreira
Share to expose is 'formacao'
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Share to expose is 'formacao' but I want it to be only writable by two AD
users and read-only for everyone else.
Then you would want read only = yes, yes?
Then the admin users wouldn't be able to write to it, would
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
And you're correct, the man page points this out.
I've tried to avoid this particular kind of manipulation ever since I
first used Samba (way, way too long ago!!!) because the difference
between the permissions
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Antsu an...@antsu.eu wrote:
I dont want to print via samba
Checked your configuration with testparm, it will provide some good
clues. Some parameters are enabled by default and just remming them
out does not disable them, you need to explicitly do so.
Ex:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Suraj Rathod
suraj.rat...@solutionenterprises.co.in wrote:
but I am still facing
There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon
request
Check out the official howto:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/
Make sure
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Dale Schroeder
d...@briannassaladdressing.com wrote:
Samba 3.6 had a rewrite of the printing code. If you haven't already, you
can read about it here:
http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.6.0.html
With the winbind and printing issues I've seen with 3.6 my
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:59 AM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com wrote:
To set browse list = no solves your issue?
I think that may do what I want. Just need to make sure that the
Domain Controller can be discovered by the clients.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Is this normal or a bug? When accessing samba's bugzilla for bug #8674
I get an access denied:
You are not authorized to access bug #8674
A bug in bugzilla? I know Microsoft hides bugs and fixes, didn't know
it happened in open source.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Volker Lendecke
volker.lende...@sernet.de wrote:
If it's something reported to us that we think might be
relevant for security it can happen. Sorry.
Thought that might be a possibility.
Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
Given a DC environment where very few (1-3) hosts actually need to be
discovered via browsing is there a good way to limit what is
browseable?
I'm thinking of something like a read-only WINS - where WINS provides
only those servers that need be contacted and doesn't allow client
registrations.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:06 AM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /var/lib/nobody -s
/bin/false %m$
The machine name (e.g. computer_1$) now appears in the kdm login list for
Linux clients using kde4. This looks a mess and doesn't make
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Robert Schetterer
rob...@schetterer.org wrote:
for info
long time ago i tested exchange 5.5 / win2000 server working with a
samba pdc controller
it worked like charme, but thats years ago
Thanks, good to know. I was pretty sure it would with a Samba PDC,
just
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Derek Werthmuller
dwert...@ctg.albany.edu wrote:
Looking to make some changes to an old but working LAN, that has about 10
samba servers serving printers and network shares and a NT 4 PDC server with
Exchange 5.5 on it. The samba servers are members of the nt4
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Derek Werthmuller
dwert...@ctg.albany.edu wrote:
I did consider this, though the issue is what do I do with the existing NT4
PDC - I can demote this to BDC but from the samba docs samba PDC and Windows
BDC is not supported. And I don't think it can demote the
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Allison Jones
ajo...@answers4families.org wrote:
I'm getting ready to migrate my office of 50+ Windows XP machines to Windows
7, in a mix of 64-bit and 32-bit clients. I've setup a new samba server on
a separate domain to prepare and test for this transition.
Bug #8371 is still alive in 3.6.1 making it unusable for a member server.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:11:00AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
` Michael Wood wrote:
Hi Linda
Yeah...reported this a month ago... as well as other
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Gary Greene
ggre...@minervanetworks.com wrote:
I¹ve got a Ricoh multi-function printer/copier that I need to restrict the
colour printing functions to only members of the @ColorPrinting group. I¹ve
two print queues for the Ricoh, one colour, one not.
2011/9/29 Gary Greene ggre...@minervanetworks.com:
I think that the raw
option for the -o raw is the culprit here on the print command option line
for lpr-cups. Do Samba shared printers require this option?
I don't believe so.
Removing the color option from the PPD should be straightforward,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:47 PM, John G. Heim jh...@math.wisc.edu wrote:
I have 7 color laser printers configured in cups. Linux users can
successfully print in color to them but Windows users cannot
Try adding:
cups options = raw
to [global]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Keith Lynn l...@cis.usouthal.edu wrote:
In particular, what I mean is, is it possible to have a printer shared
through Samba so that everytime a user tries to print through the share,
they are asked to reaunthenticate?
Not an answer (sorry), but I'm curious as
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
With the standard:
idmap config * : backend = tdb
no results are returned by getent, and wbinfo does not always
work, also no winbind_idmap.tdb file is ever created.
by changing to:
idmap config * : backend
Testing 3.6.0 on a member server of a 3.5.8 domain shows some strange problems.
With the standard:
idmap config * : backend = tdb
no results are returned by getent, and wbinfo does not always
work, also no winbind_idmap.tdb file is ever created.
by changing to:
idmap config * : backend
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
Do you see the bad packet messages also on your PDCs nmbd.log when wbinfo
tries to fetch information?
Yes, but not 100% correlated. IOW, there are some, but there should be
more with all of the
All users whose logon script values have not been explicitly defined
automagically inherit the value that logon script is set to in
smb.conf. And one can change the logon script for all such users
simply by changing said value in smb.conf. However, once a logon
script value value has been
A user who upgraded to OS X Lion could no longer add the Samba hosted
printers to his system. In this account the user logon rights are
limited by workstation. Checking the Samba logs showed that OS X Lion
was sending workstation as the NetBIOS name instead of the
configured NetBIOS name (same as
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Thomas Harvey
tom.har...@onefinestay.com wrote:
When the server gets it's IP address by DHCP the Lenovo will join just fine.
Does:
hostname -f
...provide the same info in both cases?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Chris Beach chr...@pintys.com wrote:
[root@success]# pdbedit -P maximum password age
account policy value for maximum password age is 90
At one time I used pdbedit to force a password change and that stopped
working. Apparently it was deprecated in favor of net
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:27 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
He is using an ancient version of samba (3.0.10-1.4E) though so the
depreciation probably does not apply.
Thanks. Missed that sorta - wasn't going to dig through the changelog
back to the stone ages.
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Vincent Malien ad...@socofer.com wrote:
this morning, I added entries to the files lmhosts.sam
FYI, the sam in lmhosts.sam stands for sample - you need to put
the valid data in a file named lmhosts (no .sam, .txt, etc.) or it
isn't being used at all.
Chris
--
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, BartekR bojle...@gmail.com wrote:
So it is impossible to solve this issue ?
Maybe :)
Try running:
=
net config server /autodisconnect:-1
=
on the XP workstations.
Check the network device in device manager and make sure
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:41 AM, BartekR bojle...@gmail.com wrote:
name resolve order = wins host bcast
As You wrote below. Am I correct ?
3) make sure that your DHCP server (you seem to have enough systems
that manual configuration would be undesirable) provides the proper
information for
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:59 PM, BartekR bojle...@gmail.com wrote:
So it is Windows XP workstations to blame or maybe there is another thing
that i should check ?
I run several Samba installations with no such issues with XP. So
unless your XP installs are tweaked in some weird fashion I
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:38 PM, BartekR bojle...@gmail.com wrote:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384
security = share
os level = 255
domain master = no
preferred master = yes
Try changing the above parameters.
Eliminate, or comment out:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Felix Brack f...@ltec.ch wrote:
A 'getfacl' on /srv/samba/file-shares/tmp returns:
# file: srv/samba/file-shares/tmp
# owner: root
# group: root
# flags: -s-
user::rwx
group::r-x
group:Development:rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Felix Brack f...@ltec.ch wrote:
# file: test-file
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::rwx #effective:r--
group:Development:rwx #effective:r--
mask::r--
other::---
That's the same thing you would get if were logged
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Werner Durgarten
wernerdurgar...@gmx.de wrote:
I wonder why the advanced settings dialog works, but permissions are not
properly displayed on the security settings tab - is this normal?
Yes. I think so. Pretty sure it's mentioned in the official docs as well.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Werner Durgarten
wernerdurgar...@gmx.de wrote:
Are you able to view and modify permissions via windows explorer and could
you give me i a hint how i can get this working (without admin users)?
Yes, anyone with the proper file and share permissions can do so.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Werner Durgarten
wernerdurgar...@gmx.de wrote:
i just noticed, that files that are created by any samba user who is in the
admin users list, belong to root in the unix filesystem. This is not what i
want. Are there any other options to allow sb. else than the
This is probably a CUPS bug but maybe not, I'll mention it here just in case.
When using cupsaddsmb to install 64bit drivers the drivers must be in
the (maybe distro/configure dependent):
/usr/share/cups/drivers/x64
to be sure that's x64 with a lower case x. The cupsaddsmb app
ignores the drivers
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mike Brady mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
netbios aliases = filesshares
name resolve order = wins bcast hosts
Sorry Mike, I don't have much of a clue.
There is a typo in your name resolve order - hosts should be
host but I doubt that has anything to do with
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mike Brady mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
Thanks for looking any way. I have fixed hosts, which isn't picked up by
testparm
Testparm mostly tests the parameters (the left side of =) and not the arguments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Mike Brady mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
No.
Is nmbd running on the PDC?
Do you have a wins.dat file (possible location of
/var/lib/samba/wins.dat - depends on configure)?
Maybe post the global section (minus comments) of your smb.conf.
--
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Mike Brady mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
wins server = yes is set
man smb.conf
wins server = the ip address of the wins server (unneeded on the
actual wins server)
wins support = yes (on the actual wins server)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Mike Brady mike.br...@devnull.net.nz wrote:
Sorry, I do have wins support = yes on the PDC. Faulty memory on my part.
Do you also have a wins server = a.b.c.d entry on the PDC? If so
remove it and restart Samba.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org wrote:
Samba 3.5.7, 3.4.12 and 3.3.15 are security releases in order to
address CVE-2011-0719.
Will there be a new 3.5.7 Jumbo Patch available for those using it
with 3.5.6 and strict allocate? Or does the current 3.5.6 Jumbo
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:22 AM, J. L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to access a Linux share resource in /var/share without password
from WXP desktop FROM ANY USER.
See:
http://blog.realcomputerguy.com/2010/12/samba-and-guest-shares-with-security.html
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:15 PM, J. L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
1) The Linux local user guest must be added to samba with smbpasswd
-a guest ???
In the example I show their is no local 'nix user named guest. The
purpose of the username map file is to map the Windows guest
user/account
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de wrote:
Have I to add nobody to the samba password file?
No.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Does Samba implement Microsoft's reserved WINS name capability?
From: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/934864
==
To register a reserved name record in WINS, you must register both the
name and the qualified name. (A qualified name is a name that is
followed by a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mac webreg.samba@panscend.com wrote:
May be a forum would be better?
Forums suck.
Mailling lists are good.
An NNTP newsgroup might even be better - but they seem to have gone
the way of the Dodo as the main frontend.
This list archived as such -
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Dale Schroeder
d...@briannassaladdressing.com wrote:
smb ports = 139
You're only using the netbios port. Maybe this is worth checking:
That's a pretty normal configuration. Should not affect XP's ability to connect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
On the basis of that discussion and other research, Kai and Metze
started writing Samba4's own DNS server. Then tridge and the BIND folks
got together, and given the excellent progress made, not reinventing
this
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Nemeth Zoltan nzol...@freemail.hu wrote:
How can I found out the reason, why delete from samba is different from
winappl. point of view then other shares.
Read all of the changelogs between versions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Erik Bloodaxe e.blood...@gold.ac.uk wrote:
I am trying to set up a share on a domain controlled by SAMBA that anyone
can access
See this:
http://goo.gl/AKk0K
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, J. L. Cabral jelocab...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen an implementation where the Windows desktops belong to
Company.com domain and the Samba server was a stand-alone server
with workgroup = SALES, and Windows clients access to Samba
resources succesfully.
I
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
And I have seen reported instances of Samba issues on Ubuntu being
resolved by avoiding the distro packages and compiling from source.
Hmmm, could be interesting to learn about which ones.
The reports I allude to
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
I just forwarded your mail to Steve and I think he'll make sure this
reaches the right folks in Ubuntu server team.
Thank you. Would be nice to see these startup scripts work properly.
I'll be happy to provide any
OK, not exactly a samba issue but maybe the Ubuntu maintainer reads
this list and can provide some input.
Problem: Ubuntu doesn't daemonize smbd.
System: Ubuntu Lucid where a recent update moved many startup scripts
into the upstart system.
Now smbd is started and runs as smbd -F. If I edit the
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Now smbd is started and runs as smbd -F. If I edit the upstart
script (/etc/init/smbd.conf) so that it runs as smbd -D (the default
and what I would like) it doesn't work.
Must have been a fluke - it does appear now
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:20 PM, William E Jojo w.j...@hvcc.edu wrote:
It's similar to the way you can use startsrc or stopsrc on AIX.
-F
If specified, this parameter causes the main smbd process to not
daemonize, i.e. double-fork and disassociate with the terminal.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Michel, Loubert
lmic...@astoriafederal.com wrote:
I think I am using passdb backend = smbpasswd.
How do I change it to passdb backend = tdbsam in Solaris10?
I am unable to find the passdb command even whithin Samba.
See the official docs:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Hodges, Robert CTR USAF AFMC 520
SMXS/MXDEC robert.hodges@hill.af.mil wrote:
Workgroup only, no domain
Solaris with Samba loaded, a few shares, enabled as WINS server,
configured as Master Browser
Did you ever correct the underscore in the hostname issue and
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Michel, Loubert
lmic...@astoriafederal.com wrote:
I am not using ldap however. Is that the reason why it is not working.
Are you using:
passdb backend = tdbsam
?
With:
passdb backend = smbpasswd
you will find some limitations.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Hodges, Robert CTR USAF AFMC 520
SMXS/MXDEC robert.hodges@hill.af.mil wrote:
A key item I have to keep remembering is that all of this works great in
Windows 2000. It's only XP that's having the problem.
Don't know if I would put so much weight on that - a
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
We have been networking Windowx XP boxes to Samba
for longer than anyone still working in Microsoft
Tech support, trust me on that :-).
Cute :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
