are seeing the slowness.
Running samba: samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8
Centos5 x86_64
I know I'm not providing much here, but I simply can't find anything
relevant to send.
--
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
since this started happening (it was already at the latest version for
the distro).
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
On 10/03/2013 11:00 AM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
On 03.10.2013 17:20, Doug Tucker wrote:
client attempts to access a resource on a
shared drive either by saving, or just simply clicking
endpoint is not connected
Oct 2 09:45:30 agentsmith2 smbd[25985]: getpeername failed. Error was
Transport endpoint is not connected
Oct 2 09:45:30 agentsmith2 smbd[25989]: getpeername failed. Error was
Transport endpoint is not connected
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
On 10/03/2013 11:11 AM, Doug
servers on the network that aren't experiencing any
file server interruption. As for the samba server itself, I moved some
clients over to our backup and the problem follows them.
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
On 10/03/2013 12:11 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:03:39PM -0500
agentsmith2 kernel: [80023cc3]
sys_newstat+0x19/0x31
Oct 3 08:31:58 agentsmith2 kernel: [8005ddf9]
error_exit+0x0/0x84
Oct 3 08:31:58 agentsmith2 kernel: [8005d116]
system_call+0x7e/0x83
Oct 3 08:31:58 agentsmith2 kernel:
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
On 10/03/2013 12
.
But alas, mac and linux clients see the same issue.
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
On 10/03/2013 02:42 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:07:05PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
Already been down that path. I can't find a network issue anywhere.
Our samba server itself is set up with a bonded
Just to close this out for information purposes for anyone else that
runs into this looking for an answer, adding these 2 lines globally
fixed my issue.
posix locking = no
kernel oplocks = no
Sincerely,
Doug
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:04 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
On 10 May 2011 21:14, Doug
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Doug Tucker
Gesendet: Montag, 9. Mai 2011 16:05
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Microsoft Outlook pst files unable to open or create
All,
I sent a message for help a couple of weeks ago about a samba migration
issue. With further
( debian ) with outlook 2003 pst in my users home
folder, in hidden folder ( .email )
no probems here, not even with the 4GB + pst files.. :-S
Greetz,
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: tuck...@lyle.smu.edu
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Namens Doug Tucker
Verzonden
no problems after the upgrade with outlook.
There were settings changed in samba, because of security issues.
are the pst file on nfs mounted folder of something like that.
Which kernel are you running?
Best regards,
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Doug Tucker
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Doug Tucker [mailto:tuck...@lyle.smu.edu]
Verzonden: 2011-05-10 16:23
Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Microsoft Outlook pst files unable to
open or create
Louis,
A uname of the new server:
uname -a
Linux
that point.
so you can try that.
good luck,
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Doug Tucker [mailto:tuck...@lyle.smu.edu]
Verzonden: 2011-05-10 17:03
Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Microsoft Outlook pst files unable to
open or create
Microsoft Outlook's personal folders (*.pst) react quite badly to
oplocks.
If in doubt, disable oplocks and tune your system from that point.
so you can try that.
good luck,
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Doug Tucker [mailto:tuck...@lyle.smu.edu]
Verzonden: 2011-05-10
,
Doug Tucker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
All,
I am trying to migrate from one cifs server to another without taking a
hard outtage. We have all of our users map their drives via a cname of
\\cifs. We changed the dns and static wins entry from server1 to
server2 and allowed the clients to transition over. It mostly went well
but for a
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:32 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:21:53AM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
It's not self-healing if you use kill -9, it could never be so.
Jeremy.
Jeremy, well, I gave up and rebooted to one kernel back, and wallah, you
I get these errors constantly in the logs:
Oct 15 16:52:43 agentsmith smbd[29896]: [2008/10/15 16:52:43, 0]
smbd/service.c:set_current_service(184)
Oct 15 16:52:43 agentsmith smbd[29896]: chdir
(/users2/seasadm/khubbard) failed
But I don't have reason to believe they are not actually
It's not self-healing if you use kill -9, it could never be so.
Jeremy.
Jeremy, well, I gave up and rebooted to one kernel back, and wallah, you
are correct, it fixed the problem. And, it cleared up some horrible
slowness we had been seeing as well. For anyone else out there having
this
Great ! That restores my faith in the way the universe works :-). Glad
you solved your problem.
Jeremy.
FWIW though, RedHat is not accepting this as a kernel bug though. There
is a bugzilla on this kernel, but it's in regard to unloading iptables
(which yes, does kernel panic 100% of the
Ok, if you're killing smbd with a kill -9 then it doesnt'
get chance to clean up its share mode records and so you
will see this. However, as subsequent smbd's notice this
pid no longer exists they should self-clean out the dead
open mode records (Samba is designed to be self-repairing
We are have a very serious issue we cannot seem to solve. I cannot
duplicate the problem by trying, but sometimes when clients are logging
out, the smb processes are not closing upon their exit, and leaving the
processes running indefinitely, and often times with locked files that
they cannot
If a kill -9 won't kill the process you have either a kernel
bug or a hardware problem, not a Samba issue.
Jeremy.
Thanks, we have 2 cifs servers, and they are both having the issue. I'm
doubting a hardware problem. Not sure where to go with a kernel bug.
Doing a restart on samba does fix
When you've done a restart are there any of the old smbd
processes left around ? If not, then you are incorrect, and
a kill -9 does terminate them.'
Umm..ok. I can just state the facts, I'm not pretending to understand
them. To make sure I'm communicating properly, If I do:
/etc/init.d/smb
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 19:37 +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Doug,
Du (tuckerd) meintest am 03.10.08:
Umm..ok. I can just state the facts, I'm not pretending to
understand them. To make sure I'm communicating properly, If I do:
/etc/init.d/smb restart
the old processes and
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of users
read only
We have a couple of samba 3.x servers that are members of our windows
AD, and authenticate users via AD. Our realm defininition in kdc5.conf
was the likes of domain.net, and our kdc definition was pdc.domain.net.
All worked just fine. However, the pdc was taken down for a move, and
winbind could
Its in control panel, programs and features, turn windows features on
or off..indexing service.
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:44 -0200, Roberto João Lopes Garcia wrote:
At 11:28 26/10/2007, you wrote:
I didn't see anyone answer this. We noticed a tremendous slowdown of
our samba server the
I didn't see anyone answer this. We noticed a tremendous slowdown of
our samba server the minute we put our first Vista client on it due to
IO. Turns out that by default, Vista has an indexing feature turned on
that sits there and loops continually indexing every file it can find.
So if you have
I'm getting this frequently in our logs but I cannot replicate the
problem when I try. I have a user successfully map his home directory:
2007/09/05 09:13:14, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305)
check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [lmerrill] - [lmerrill]
- [lmerrill] succeeded
Nobody?
Forwarded Message
From: Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] problem writing files
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:54:27 -0500
I have 2 samba servers, both joined and authenticating against AD. One
is a redhat box with the stock
I have 2 samba servers, both joined and authenticating against AD. One
is a redhat box with the stock latest up2date rpm, the 2nd, and
problematic one, is a debian with the latest .deb in the sarge tree.
The first one works flawlessly, the 2nd one, anytime a windows user
tries to write a file, it
My apologies to all, this turned out to be a client side configuration
issue with the Win2k clients.
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 16:28 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
Greetings! I have my samba server joined to an ADS 2003 server, and
authentication is working fine for all XP clients. However when
Greetings! I have my samba server joined to an ADS 2003 server, and
authentication is working fine for all XP clients. However when Win2k
clients try to map a share, they get the error: System error 1311, no
authentication servers are available. How do I correct this?
--
To unsubscribe from
the KDC when
needed.
Simo.
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 16:53 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
Thanks. But again, is the ticket even needed? I deleted the darn
thing, rebooted to make sure it wasn't cached in memory somewhere, and
everything seems to be working perfectly. If it is indeed
Great! Thanks to everyone for the help, keep up the good work!
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:42 -0400, simo wrote:
Doug,
you don't need any login to make samba work in an AD environment.
At the join samba creates a machine account in a domain, and stores
the
machine password in the secrets.tdb
I recently joined a samba 3.0.22 server to AD. When I did the kinit,
the AD gave me a 24 hour ticket with a 1 week renewal. Setting -r and
-l to 365d did not change anything, the ticket still came back the same.
However, my question is in reguard to whether this is really even
needed? First, I
side?
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 23:07 +0200, Blaž Primc wrote:
Hi,
the period for which the ticket is valid can be set in Windows Server.
Best regards, Blaž.
Doug Tucker wrote:
I recently joined a samba 3.0.22 server to AD. When I did the kinit,
the AD gave me a 24 hour ticket with a 1
37 matches
Mail list logo
