On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, John H Terpstra wrote:
ACLs information has to be stored somewhere! If not in the file system
itself then in a separate database. If in a separate database then HOW do
we keep that database current with the files in the filesystem as
Unix/Linux users re-arrange files
Michael Steffens wrote:
I could (almost) reproduce it on HP-UX, and (almost) fix it
using inherit acls = Yes. :)
Both almost refer to mask (or class, respectively) behaving
a bit strange. But this might be platform specific.
Yes. inherit acls = yes solves my problem. Thanks to all who
Hi all!
I posted this in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there were no reactions.
Particulary I'm interested if anyone observe the same behavior.
-- Honza Houstek
--
server:
linux 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and its ACL
libacl 2.0.19
It was promised in the announcment that patches for older versions of will
be posted on request in this list.
I cannot upgrade to 2.2.8 because of some problems with ACLs. Another
sollution would be to use the old ACL code but I do not understand the
samba code enought to do it myself.
Thanks in
2.2.8 is not only a security release, many things have changed between
2.2.7a and 2.2.8. Unfortunately, the backport of ACL code from 3.0 makes
problems for me, so I'd like do continue using 2.2.7a with the security
bug repaired.
Would this be possible?
-- Honza Houstek
--
To unsubscribe from
samba prints an extra blank page after every print job...it happened when
i switched from mandrake 9.0 to debian 3.0RC1
how do i fix this
i even put a :sf: in my /etc/printcap but still it doesn't work
Are you sure that it is in samba? Which spooler do you use? Does it the
same when you
Last weekend I upgraded from 2.2.7a to 2.2.8 because of the security
problems. Unfortunately 2.2.8 is not only security upgrade but also
contains some improvements one of which is backport of ACL code from 3.x
Since the upgrade I have problems with rights. In a directory with empty
ACL for the
