Windows does allow duplicate sessions actually. If you net use *
\\hostname\share and then net use \\ipaddress\share for the same server
you will get two connections to the same server on your client (you can
even use different users). Is it possible that this is what some users
are doing? Also mac
If you're interested, Tridge put this code up with instructions at:
http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/tsig-gss/
While I can't vouch for whether the code works, I can vouch that the
author writes good code :). At the very least it could be a starting
point for you.
-Marc
> -Origi
> Indeed - as this is a security sensitive area it would definately
> default to the current (safe) behaviour. Especially in case I screw
> up the implementation :-).
>
> Jeremy.
On that note :), let me know when it's implemented, I'll give it some
initial testing.
-Marc
--
To uns
Jeremy,
I think this is really a great idea, and potentially a very valuable
feature as long as group acl control = false by default.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g]
> On Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
> Sent: Monday, J
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaplan, Marc
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 11:05 AM
> To: Cristian Thiago Moecke; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Problems with unicode filenames
>
> Oh, you're using smbmount -- you
Oh, you're using smbmount -- you didn't say so previously. As far as I know,
smbmount doesn't support Unicode (can somebody confirm?), so you'll have to use
the smbmount replacement, mount.cifs. See:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/mount.cifs.8.html
-Marc
> -Original Me
No, the parameter is named "unix charset", not "charset"! In smb.conf, you'll
need a parameter that says:
unix charset = UTF8
-Marc
From: Cristian Thiago Moecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26,
Do you have unix charset = UTF8 in smb.conf?
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cristian
> Thiago Moecke
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:01 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] Problems with
No, it has nothing to do with dfs; cifsfs is replacement for smbfs. See
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/mount.cifs.8.html for more
information.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:samba-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor
> Warner
> Sent:
Nope, they just show up with that roll in a search, the don't perform
any DC functionality.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: IslandBwoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:56 AM
> To: Kaplan, Marc; Thomas Boutell; [EMAIL P
I have this same problem. I wrote it up here:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423, but Jerry couldn't
reproduce it so he (rightly) marked it invalid.
This is 100% reproducible for me (and apparently you also), every samba
server I join to the domain, shows up with the role "Domain Con
This is definitely a kludgy way of doing it, but if I had that problem
and wanted to solve it quickly, I would put a file named THISISSERVER1
on \\server1\projects\. This way you can do an "if exist
p:\THISISSERVER1" test. This is ugly, but it will work.
-Marc
> -Original Mess
This is just the way filesystems work. Doing a move of a file/directory
does no kind of re-evaluation of permissions/ACLs, because it's
essentially just doing a rename.
You can see the same thing with Windows, create a file named c:\a.txt,
then create a directory named c:\a.dir. Set some inherita
As far as I know it will only be updated when you add a new user/group
to your domain. If you're concerned about this, add a new test user or
group to your domain, and see if winbindd_idmap.tdb gets updated.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:samba
What if you run net groupmap list? Can you see the domain SIDs as part
of the group SIDs there? If so, I would think you could use net
setlocalsid to restore it.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:samba-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Zeng
Simon,
Yes, I have recompiled the kernel with support for a static NGROUPS with
a patch from tridge and Rusty Russell. This does not seem to cause any
problems at all on Samba servers, or with the Linux box in general and
it does properly allow more supplementary groups.
Here is what I used IIRC:
The controller for NetBench is the computer that is responsible for
coordinating the NetBench test, and collecting results.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:samba-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denis
> Vlasenko
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 20
Do you have another fileserver, perhaps a Windows box that you could
test this against? It really doesn't sound like a Samba problem, and if
you can rule that out, you should submit a bug to Veritest (who wrote
the NetBench software).
I have run multiple engines per client before without a problem
I have this same problem on 3.0.10, and I also "fixed" it by deleting
the tdbs. My problem, had nothing to do with printing, it was happening
once I started winbindd with security = ADS.
Jerry, what would we need to do to track this bug down in the tdb code?
I have logs at level 10, ltrace output
Try setting auth methods = sam winbind. IIRC when in domain
authentication auth methods does not include users in the local sam, but
my knowledge could be based upon an older version of samba, so you'll
have to try it out.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Yes, I get more than 30MB/s performance. The benchmark I use (NetBench)
is essentially CPU bound, such that a faster processor = faster
performance. With a very fast hardware config (dual 3.2GHz processors),
I've been able to hit around 100MB/s. Changing the RAM or other
attributes does not buy me
Yes, this is in fact caused by LDAP server signing requirements set to
"Require Siging". I put a bug in previously here:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765
And Jeremy Naylor created a patch to add TLS support in libads. The TLS
method is potentially more secure, but it requires a certi
Maybe it's stuck in a library call loop. Try ltrace -p 2170 -f -o
smbd.2170.ltrace.out
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: Kel Way [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:06 AM
> To: Denis Vlasenko; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] A smbd p
One thing to rule out is that there is a clock difference of greater
than 5 minutes between Samba Domain Member and the DCs. Make sure that
you Samba Domain Member clock has approximately the same time as the DC.
You can do net time set -S dcname/dcip.
-Marc
> -Original Messag
Whops, switch read only = yes, cut and paste error.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaplan, Marc
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:39 AM
> To: remote; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] Problems with Access Control for Shares on Samba 2
>
> Jörg,
>
&g
Jörg,
I think if you want only one user to be able to write, but any user to be able
to access you should change things as follows:
[hobbit5]
comment = hobbit5
path = /ALPHA-DATA/hobbit5
browseable = yes
read only = no
guest = ok
write list = hobbit5
The valid use
that
> will match UNIX accounts I will create for them.
>
> ry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaplan, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:19 PM
> To: Ryan Frantz; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' &
I think as long as the passwords are the same, your approach of creating
the domain users you need as local users will work.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:04 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Su
28 matches
Mail list logo
