If I'm having oplock problems (i.e. poor performance), then would turning off
oplocks altogether bring the performance back up?
Richard G. Lang
Sr. Software Engineer
la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com
(330) 659-3312
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
...@sernet.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:46 PM
To: Lang, Rich
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:32:42PM -0400, Lang, Rich wrote:
Thanks to all who responded.
This shouldn't be anything to do with oplocks, although I
understand
Well, it just gets curiouser and curiouser.
I downloaded, built and installed the latest stable version of Samba (i.e.
3.5.9) on my inactive cluster member which is running RedHat ES 5.6. In case
I didn't show this before, here's the output of `uname -a`:
Linux mustang1 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 #1
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Volker Lendecke
Cc: Lang, Rich; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:31:14PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Hi!
I'd rather
...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 3:49 PM
To: Lang, Rich
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:39:16AM -0400, Lang, Rich wrote:
Hello,
We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES.
Its
Lang, Rich wrote:
Hello,
We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES.
Its primary application is to serve out a single network drive to support our
business (out 350GB in size). For several years, this solution has been
running flawlessly. File access
Hello,
We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES.
Its primary application is to serve out a single network drive to support our
business (out 350GB in size). For several years, this solution has been
running flawlessly. File access was almost as fast as a
Sorry - I didn't realize the list wouldn't accept attachments. Here is the
smb.conf file:
#Backup Domain Controller
## Global parameters
[global]
unix charset = LOCALE
workgroup = IBMPEERS
netbios name = mustang1
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE
