Anybody else? Any sugestion?
Yours truly,
Marcio Oliveira
2013/3/18 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
Hi TMason, Jim and Daniel. I don't know what more to do.
Follow the informations to all you help me if possible.
1
on each as you log on for a moment when no-one is using
network)
I don't like the look of the backslash in your [netlogon] admin users
either. Why not just leave the entire line out?
Jim
On 18 March 2013 17:56, Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi TMason, Jim and Daniel. I don't know
, wheras the other's
trust account would fail but could log in with cached credentials and then
have problems connecting to domain repated stuff.
hope that helps
Jim
On 15/03/2013 23:26, TMason wrote:
Marcio Oli wrote in message
news:CANpJy9WD=CLxbB=BQhgS==1mt-rktxt0hvmi6muymz5rkxm
available to give more informations about my environment in order to we
solve this issue.
Thanks,
Marcio.
2013/3/15 TMason c.koe...@live.com
Marcio Oli wrote in message news:CANpJy9WD=CLxbB=BQhgS==**
1mt-rkTXT0hVMi6muymZ5RKXMktg@**mail.gmail.com...
Hi people, I have a problem and I need so much
Hi people, I have a problem and I need so much of your help.
I have a login script in \\server1\netlogon\script.bat (on my PDC and BDC)
that runs net use commands to map some shares in time of the logon.
This login tries to map share in another server (samba member of domain
\\server2).
So, I
Ok TAKAHASHI!
Thank you. The question was exactly this.
Marcio Oliveira
2012/12/8 TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com
From: Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:04:29 -0200
When I list a directory within the linux OS, appears like this:
...
-rwxr--r--. 1 root
When I list a directory within the linux OS, appears like this:
...
-rwxr--r--. 1 root pgt.cxt 7,2K Nov 25 14:33 New Text OpenDocument.odt
...
At smb.conf is of this way:
[global]
workgroup = PGT
server string = Descricao
security = DOMAIN
obey pam restrictions =
Hi people,
I have a server where all shares are at a same level. I would like to
put the printers within a subfolder with any name. Could anybody help me?
Thanks,
--
Marcio Oliveira.
Tudo concorre para o bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
be located.
Anybody?
Thanks again,
Marcio.
2012/11/27 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
Hi people,
I have a server where all shares are at a same level. I would like to
put the printers within a subfolder with any name. Could anybody help me?
Thanks,
--
Marcio Oliveira.
Tudo
Hi people,
I'd like to know about registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System\WaitForNetwork.
The question is simple, but I didn't get to find the answer; so, the
time to be specified, per default, is in minutes or in secounds?
Thanks a lot,
--
Marcio
Ok I already found the answer.
The time is in seconds and the maximum time to wait is 300s.
Thanks.
Marcio Oliveira.
2012/11/22 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
Hi people,
I'd like to know about registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System
Hi Jeff,
my configs. are like yours. The default value of parameter logon
drive is logon drive =, so testparm is correct, because the output is
showed only if different of default values.
Thanks,
Marcio Oliveira.
2012/10/31 Jeff Dickens j...@seamanpaper.com
I have logon drive = in
In my case, I'm using:
logon path =
logon home =
logon drive =
It is working ok, in other words, with local profiles only.
Test the configurations with testparm command to see the output of the
smb.conf file.
Regards,
Marcio Oliveira.
2012/10/30 Jeff Dickens j...@seamanpaper.com
From
Oi Natália,
como vc efetuou essas configurações no samba? Eu fiquei curioso para
saber como criar esse tipo de restrição!
Att.,
Marcio Oliveira.
--
Hi Natália,
how did you make this configurations on samba? I were curious to know
how to create this kind of restriction!
Graciously,
:10 keltezéssel, Marcio Oli írta:
I think the question is simple, so anybody could help me with this?
The questions are:
1. The samba PDCs and BDCs have obligation to be joined to domain?
In a samba3 (aka classic domain not)
2. The net rpc testjoin command must to return OK
I think the question is simple, so anybody could help me with this?
The questions are:
1. The samba PDCs and BDCs have obligation to be joined to domain?
2. The net rpc testjoin command must to return OK in this case?
Thanks,
Marcio Oliveira
2012/10/19 Marcio Oli marcio.oli
.
Could it be some sort of bug?
Thank you for your help.
--
*From:* Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
*To:* samba@lists.samba.org
*Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:02 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Samba] Samba not locking files
I don't know, but you could try
People,
I have one PDC and a BDC on the matrix side and two BDCs on the branch
office.
I don't know if it is a problem. Anybody could help me?
PDC # net rpc testjoin
get_schannel_session_key: could not fetch trust account password for domain
'DOMAIN_NAME'
net_rpc_join_ok: failed to get
I don't know, but you could try to change the parameters strict
locking and locking to the default values or just remove them from
smb.conf. I think that these actions can solve the problem. After, tell us
a feedback!
Thanks,
Marcio.
2012/10/18 Marko R markor...@yahoo.com
Hello,
I
People I'm new in Samba and I'm trying to learn with manuals, sites etc..
So, I'd like to know how can I test my enviroment. In other words, I'd like
to know if my DCs are working correctly.
I'm working in a new company and now I'm the sponsor about domain.
The structure is two sites (matrix
bem daqueles que amam à Deus. (Rom 8,28)
2012/10/10 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
This log is repeatedly appearing:
[2012/10/10 18:42:47.088584, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:385(tdb_log)
tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (64768,921067)
is already open in this process
Another important information is that I already allowed the windows
firewall rules (network discovery rules).
Anybody already passed by these situations?
Thanks,
Marcio Oliveira.
2012/10/10 Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com
People,
some of the machines of my network aren't
Ok Matthieu,
Bug reported:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282
Thanks,
Marcio.
2012/10/9 Matthieu Patou m...@matws.net
Feel free to file a bug report related to the doc. It's the best way to
get it fixed
Matthieu.
Marcio Oli marcio.oli...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok Matthieu
People,
some of the machines of my network aren't been listed in (Windows
Explorer - Network icon).
I made a research and I found the following:
- try to activate some services:
SSDP Discovery;
UPnP Device Host;
Function Discovery Resource Publication.
Note: this situation
This log is repeatedly appearing:
[2012/10/10 18:42:47.088584, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:385(tdb_log)
tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (64768,921067)
is already open in this process
Anybody knows if it's true tha it's harmless?
Thanks,
--
Marcio Oliveira.
Tudo concorre para o
Ok Matthieu, thanks again about your answer.
The suggestion is to modify and correct this question on the URL:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html#NAMERESOLVEORDER
Thanks,
Marcio.
2012/10/9 Matthieu Patou m...@samba.org
On 10/08/2012 02:38 PM, Marcio Oli wrote:
Hi
Anybody could help me with this entries in my machines logs:
[2012/10/09 14:59:33.092831, 0] lib/util_sock.c:474(read_fd_with_timeout)
[2012/10/09 14:59:33.093013, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:1441(get_peer_addr_internal)
getpeername failed. Error was Ponto final de transporte não está
conectado
Hi Matthieu Patou,
the version that I'm using is Samba 3.5.10-116.el6_2. It was
installed with rpm command.
The OS is:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago)
Linux [name of host] 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38
EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
Hi Matthieu Patou,
the version that I'm using is Samba 3.5.10-116.el6_2. It was
installed with rpm command.
The OS is:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago)
Linux [name of host] 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38
EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I am writing this letter and I hope that I'll have answers about the
generation of smb.conf by the way of smb.conf.master with testparm command.
Like is described on page 5 of Samba3-HOWTO.pdf.
The situation is:
- The manual of smb.conf says that the default value of the parameter “name
resolve
30 matches
Mail list logo
