is appreciated,
Regards,
Peter Daum
Peter Daum wrote:
I maintain a heterogenous network with a shared LDAP account database.
The user accounts have globally unique user names, UIDs and RIDs.
Some, but not all accounts are valid on all machines, but there is no
need for samba
?
Regards,
Peter Daum
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Martin Sundmacher wrote:
Peter Daum schrieb:
Any clues?
How about posting one of your smb.conf?
... not particularly helpful, because the phenomenon is obviously
not dependent on any particularly configuration and also occurs
with a smb.conf that only defines the path for one share
Unfortunately, running a packet sniffer on the server does not make
things any better in my case (otherwise it would be at least an
easy workaround ;)
Regards,
Peter Daum
Daniel Lindgren wrote:
I am also having performance problems writing to a Samba share (see
previous
(at leas AFAIK) occurs when copying large
files from Windows XP to Samba shares (and at that occasion I could
reproduce it with all the Samba servers and XP clients that I checked
so far)
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Peter Daum
I noted an extremely
on the Samba server and again
measure the time
- post your results here
I assume that some more people would notice a problem somewhere ...
Regards,
Peter Daum
Peter Daum wrote:
I noted an extremely poor performance when copying big files from
a windows xp
Sebastian Held wrote:
But the only thing I wanted to show is, that my WinXP has no problems writing
to a Samba share. Performance is good (at least in my opinion).
... so obviously the problems that I encounter do not occur in all
cases - of course it would be good to know what makes the
I noted an extremely poor performance when copying big files from
a windows xp client to a samba share. The exact version of samba
does not seem to matter: I tried several different samba servers
with versions between 3.014 and 3.0.23b running on Linux 2.4.32
and 2.6.17 (machines and network
loads of programs to the new schema. The worst part of
it: should I run into any problems after the upgrade, there wouldn't
be an easy way back to the last working state).
Regards,
Peter Daum
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions
i,
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Peter Daum wrote:
According to the corresponding entry in the
release notes, this was only used for backwards
compatibility for 2.2 smb.conf files. As far as
I can see however, not only the configuration file
syntax has changed, but support for the formerly
for specifying the server codepage
doesn't seem to exist in mount.cifs (it looks, like utf-8 is
assumed). Is there any way to explicitly set this?
Regards,
Peter Daum
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
,
so I can't tell which was the last correctly working samba version.
LPRng has all the time been vesion 3.6.24 and works as it should.
Client OS doesn't matter, the problems can be reproduced directly on
the (Linux) server using smbclient.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Peter Daum
12 matches
Mail list logo
