Re: RESOLVED: (sorta) Re: [Samba] Oplocks question

2009-06-10 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Toby Bluhm wrote: Terry Haley wrote: Actually Dan that helps a lot. It tells me the amount of work and effort it takes to bend this application in order to fit a mold it was not intended for. In the end, I decided to bite the bullet and make my PDC double as my primary file server. 45 mins of

[Samba] When will bug #6291 be fixed (force user)?

2009-04-27 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi all, any progrognosis when the 'force user'-bug in 3.2.11 (#6291) will be fixed? Please let me know how I can help. It looks like I am in a downward spiral here: Upgrade to 3.2.7: hit bug #6040, calling a server with it's CNAME. hit bug #, SIGBUS which breaks

Re: [Samba] Re: [Release Planning 3.4] 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed

2009-04-16 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:41:20PM +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote: Hey folks, the release of Samba 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed until April 30, 2009 due to the samr access check bugs and bug #6263 (Domain login problems in Windows XP without SP3). @Developers: There is still

Re: [Samba] [Release Planning 3.4] 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed

2009-04-15 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Karolin Seeger wrote: Hey folks, the release of Samba 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed until April 30, 2009 due to the samr access check bugs and bug #6263 (Domain login problems in Windows XP without SP3). So the bug Peter Rindfuss reported yesterday is acknowleged by this? If so, it would be the

Re: [Samba] [Release Planning 3.4] 3.4.0pre1 will be delayed

2009-04-15 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Peter Rindfuss wrote: On 15.04.2009 15:12, Karolin Seeger wrote: The code change between 3.2.9 is really small and it was not the intention to introduce the bug, but maybe it happened. I went from 3.2.8 to 3.2.10, i.e. the bug could have been introduced either in 3.2.9 or 3.2.10. In

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.2.7 server loses printer - driver assignment - aditional info

2009-01-21 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:07:33PM +0100, Remy Zandwijk wrote: Our Samba/CUPS based printserver loses the info of which driver belongs to a certain printer. The server is running Samba 3.2.7 on Solaris 9. The workstation from which printerdrivers are uploaded runs from

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.2.7 server loses printer - driver assignment - aditional info

2009-01-21 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:54:03AM +0100, Remy Zandwijk wrote: OK, we have a backtrace (using dbx from Sun Studio): /opt/SUNWspro/bin/dbx -I /var/tmp/source -S /opt/samba/sbin/smbd 24586 Reading smbd Reading ld.so.1 Reading libthread.so.1 Reading libldap.so.5 Reading

[Samba] Samba 3.2.7 server loses printer - driver assignment

2009-01-20 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi, Our Samba/CUPS based printserver loses the info of which driver belongs to a certain printer. The server is running Samba 3.2.7 on Solaris 9. Out of the blue, users complain they cannot print. Looking at 'printers and faxes' from a Windows machine shows no info in the 'Model' field. In

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.2.7 server loses printer - driver assignment - aditional info

2009-01-20 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Our Samba/CUPS based printserver loses the info of which driver belongs to a certain printer. The server is running Samba 3.2.7 on Solaris 9. The workstation from which printerdrivers are uploaded runs from a VMware server VM (XP) which is reverted to the last snapshot every time, to have a

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.2.7 server loses printer - driver assignment - aditional info

2009-01-20 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Jeremy Allison wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:07:33PM +0100, Remy Zandwijk wrote: Our Samba/CUPS based printserver loses the info of which driver belongs to a certain printer. The server is running Samba 3.2.7 on Solaris 9. The workstation from which printerdrivers are uploaded runs from

Re: [Samba] Calling Samba print server with an aliased DNS-name fails with Samba 3.2.7 but worked with 3.0.30.

2009-01-15 Thread Remy Zandwijk
I investigated this problem and it's a bug. Refer to: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6040 -Remy Tonight, I upgraded our Samba print server running Samba 3.0.30 to Samba 3.2.7. This netbios name of this server is 'EUPRYMNA' and the DNS-name 'euprymna.falw.vu.nl'. Since this is a

[Samba] Join fails with 'SPNEGO login failed: invalid parameter' - SOLVED

2009-01-13 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Replying my own mail. I resolved this issue, which was the result of missing iconv library files. Apparently, the default install of the SUNWuiu8 package (Iconv modules for UTF-8 Locale) misses some files. Patch 113896-07, which is not part of the recommended and security patch clusters, adds

[Samba] Calling Samba print server with an aliased DNS-name fails with Samba 3.2.7 but worked with 3.0.30.

2009-01-13 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi. Tonight, I upgraded our Samba print server running Samba 3.0.30 to Samba 3.2.7. This netbios name of this server is 'EUPRYMNA' and the DNS-name 'euprymna.falw.vu.nl'. Since this is a difficult name to remember, we created a DNS-alias 'printserver.falw.vu.nl'. Connecting to printers by

Re: [Samba] Join fails with 'SPNEGO login failed: invalid parameter'

2008-11-05 Thread Remy Zandwijk
left it out, except for the last lines. Regards, Remy Zandwijk -- smb.conf [global]-section: global] netbios name= MEGAPTERAFALW workgroup = ALW server string = ALW %L log file

[Samba] Join fails with 'SPNEGO login failed: invalid parameter'

2008-11-03 Thread Remy Zandwijk
on the list, so I left it out, except for the last lines. Regards, Remy Zandwijk -- smb.conf [global]-section: global] netbios name= MEGAPTERAFALW workgroup = ALW server string = ALW %L log file

[Samba] Documentation error

2008-10-27 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi. Chapter 20 of The Official Samba 3.2.x HOWTO and Reference Guide points to http://us6.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/msdfs.html but this URL takes me to chapter 41 in stead of 20. I believe this is an error. -Remy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.2.1 not detecting interface in Solaris 10 x86

2008-10-04 Thread Remy Zandwijk
I'm currently in the process of testing Samba 3.2.1.x compiled for Solaris 10 x86, because there are some issues I have found with the default Sun supported 3.0.28a that I am trying to resolve. In the process of attempting to run up 3.2.1.x, I have found that when I issue an

Re: [Samba] Symlinks and samba-3

2008-06-16 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Sorry, it was my client's fault, please disregard this issue. MacOSX 10.5.3 apparently has a problem with smb:// connections.. Take a look at the 'unix extensions' parameter. Setting this to 'No' results in the previous behaviour. -Remy 15 jun 2008 kl. 21.37 skrev Bengt Nilsson: Is it

Re: [Samba] Browsing with 2 PDCs on same subnet

2008-05-29 Thread Remy Zandwijk
John H Terpstra wrote: On Wednesday 28 May 2008 16:21:45 Richard Foltyn wrote: Hi group, after having read the browsing chapters in both the Samba HOWTO and in Using Samba, I'm still not sure about browsing and two Samba PDCs on the same subnet. If both PDCs are DMBs and LMBs for their

Re: [Samba] Seamless update from Samba 2 to Samba 3 on a new server

2008-05-24 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Florian, An obvious question maybe, but does your local passwd file contain the machine accounts? And why do you copy the secrets.tdb? I think that's not needed. Remy Hi, I'm new to the list, I hope i'm posting at the right place ;) I'm having a hard time trying to update and to move

[Samba] Compile warnings on Solaris 9 / Sun Studio 12

2008-05-22 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi. I'm compiling Samba 3.0.29 on Solaris 9 SPARC with Sun Studio 12. I see a lot of warnings like these: ./librpc/gen_ndr/srvsvc.h, line 213: warning: enumerator value overflows INT_MAX (2147483647) ./librpc/gen_ndr/srvsvc.h, line 216: warning: enumerator value overflows INT_MAX

Re: [Samba] PDC migration: printing trouble. Summary.

2008-04-09 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi all, Thanks for all replies regarding the subject. I took some time to debug the problem, which resulted in some interesting insights. I started with a clean printer driver repository, no ntforms, ntprinters and ntdrivers.tdb files. Then I installed and assigned the drivers to the

Re: [Samba] PDC migration: printing trouble.

2008-04-05 Thread Remy Zandwijk
For me this was a windows bug and not a samba bug. Apparently windows remembers every printer you ever had connected to your machine and for every operation that brings up a print dialog it tries to contact all of these printers even though the printer has been deleted from you list of

[Samba] PDC migration: printing trouble.

2008-04-04 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi all, we've been moving an old Samba 2.2.x PDC install to a Samba 3.0.28 PDC install. We copied the ntdrivers.tdb and ntprinters.tdb from to old to the new server. After the migration, everything was just fine, except printing seemed to be somewhat slower. As more and more user logged on,

Re: [Samba] PDC migration: printing trouble.

2008-04-04 Thread Remy Zandwijk
John Drescher wrote: we've been moving an old Samba 2.2.x PDC install to a Samba 3.0.28 PDC install. We copied the ntdrivers.tdb and ntprinters.tdb from to old to the new server. After the migration, everything was just fine, except printing seemed to be somewhat slower. As more and more user

Re: Re [Samba] LDAP adding workstation accounts fails (but not really???)

2008-02-29 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi. I've been struggling with this also. Our add machine script is a PHP script. It basically adds this in LDAP: dn: uid=testing$,ou=machines,dc=falw,dc=vu,dc=nl objectClass: top objectClass: person objectClass: posixAccount uid: testing$ sn:

Re: [Samba] migrating user profiles to new domain

2008-02-22 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi, Ok, we finally have our Linux PDC up and running. I'm trying to find a good guide to copying windows XP user profiles registry settings to the newly created domain user profile. Also any utilities that could accomplish this. We are using local profiles. What about Microsofts User State

Re: [Samba] DFS

2008-01-10 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi, I see this on a windows map driver (I haven't tried it with linux): W:\Install\Windows\Windows\bla\salala So the first directory on the share get doubled, the real path should be (and was before) W:\Install\Windows\bla\salala . The mpost interesting thing is that it doesn't happen

Re: [Samba] TCP Bad checksum packets on ports 445

2007-01-25 Thread Remy Zandwijk
viewing those sessions with ethereal, I see that approx 10% of the net traffic is bad packets. Those Packets are tagged 'Bad Checksum'. The whole packets come from the server to the clients, from port 445 or 139 to an unprivileged port. None of the SSH DNS or NTP contain these errors.

Re: [Samba] ldap filter

2006-01-21 Thread Remy Zandwijk
R.J. Baart wrote: I've read that the smb.conf configuration option ldap filter is removed after samba version 3.0.14. Why is that? I could not found an explanation or work around. For one of the networks we maintain it is a very crucial option because in one LDAP directory are 5 domains

Re: [Samba] Problem after upgrade from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21a

2006-01-13 Thread Remy Zandwijk
I found out that I need to use 'fake' 'idmap uid' and 'idmap gid' to get it to work. Is that a winbind bug? In Should be fine without either an idmap uid/gid range. Are you saying that winbindd will not start without these? I searched bugzilla and found bug 3289, which describes the

Re: [Samba] Problem after upgrade from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21a

2006-01-12 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Are you running winbindd on the member server? I would recommend it but since the posixAccount information is being shared via LDAP, make sure to set 'winbind trusted domains only = yes' Yes, winbind is running and I set 'winbind trusted domains only = yes'. I found out that I need to use

Re: [Samba] Problem after upgrade from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21a

2006-01-12 Thread Remy Zandwijk
I found out that I need to use 'fake' 'idmap uid' and 'idmap gid' to get it to work. Is that a winbind bug? In Should be fine without either an idmap uid/gid range. Are you saying that winbindd will not start without these? Winbind does start, but when going to 'properties - Security', 'add'

[Samba] Problem after upgrade from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21a

2006-01-09 Thread Remy Zandwijk
We have 2 Samba Domain Controllers and 1 Samba Domain Member Server, running on Solaris 9. The Solaris servers are native LDAP clients to two OpenLDAP servers. All user-info is available on these servers (getent passwd). Before upgrading to Samba 3.0.21a, we were running Samba 3.0.14a. On the

Re: [Samba] bugs in 3.0.21a

2006-01-05 Thread Remy Zandwijk
'winbind enable local accounts' was listed as deprecated for several releases before it was removed. That's true. But I the OP tries to make a point here. This option is still mentioned in the documentation and that confuses people. -Remy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the

Re: [Samba] ldap filter removed?

2005-08-02 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Jerry, Better to simply update the nss_ldap filter on your Samba box. Could you please explain then, how we should do this on a Solaris 9 box, using the native Solaris LDAP stuff, without tampering with the current settings? I don't see a solution that fits. -Remy -- To unsubscribe from

[Samba] Possible to hide [homes] ?

2005-07-11 Thread Remy Zandwijk
? Kind regards, Remy Zandwijk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Possible to hide [homes] ?

2005-07-11 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Well, [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no ... that doesn't work. This is what I have in the smb.conf file: [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writeable = yes valid users = %S create mode

Re: [Samba] Possible to hide [homes] ?

2005-07-11 Thread Remy Zandwijk
For me, it hides all home directories except the current user's own. Is that not what you want? No, I want to hide the current users's own home directory as well. Adding 'available = no' to the share makes it unuseable, so that's is not going to work, since it needs to be working. In the

Re: [Samba] More info on: Solaris 9 + quota = configure script error?

2005-07-10 Thread Remy Zandwijk
pieces of Samba are being compiled wrong or aren't compiled at all. Best regards, Remy Zandwijk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] More info on: Solaris 9 + quota = configure script error?

2005-07-09 Thread Remy Zandwijk
. This is 'sys/quota.h' and it should be: sys/fs/ufs_quota.h All this is caused because SUNOS5 is not defined. When defining it manually in include/config.h, the quota.c is compiled OK and I do not get an error message. Samba Team, could you guys please take a look at this? Kind regards, Remy

[Samba] Solaris 9 + quota = configure script error?

2005-07-08 Thread Remy Zandwijk
, the quota.c is compiled OK and I do not get an error message. Samba Team, could you guys please take a look at this? Kind regards, Remy Zandwijk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Quota support Samba 3.x and Solaris 9

2005-07-07 Thread Remy Zandwijk
regards, Remy Zandwijk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Error building Samba 3.0.14a on Solaris 9

2005-07-06 Thread Remy Zandwijk
; 3.0.7 compiles OK. What could cause this error? Best regards, Remy Zandwijk -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Error building Samba 3.0.14a on Solaris 9

2005-07-06 Thread Remy Zandwijk
our bug. The attached patch should fix it. The most impressive patch I've ever seen ;-) It's working, thanks. Remy -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Questions about Domain Member server

2004-11-18 Thread Remy Zandwijk
Hi list, I have a couple of questions regarding Samba being a Domain Member of a Samba PDC and BDC. Situation: 3 servers, running Solaris 9 and Samba 3.0.7. The Solaris machines are LDAP clients (getpwent fetches info from LDAP). The Samba domain is called 'ALW'.