e, that the new PDC really can handle
the authentication/login from a client PC.
Can you use the NT4 Wins Manager tool to query your WINS server?
On 02/17/12 08:17, Wikked One wrote:
All systems are joined to the same domain and have the s
by increasing the "announce
> version" and "os level" parameters in the smb.conf file.The only way
> to really force it is to NOT use wins and configure the client to use an
> lmhosts file to find the DC.
>
>
>
> On 02/16/12 09:37, Wikked One wrot
Good Morning Samba Team,
We’ve been using Samba 3.4.8 and
OpenLdap as an NT domain PDC for a number of years, running on CentOS 5.7 64
bit. In the
meantime I’ve been configuring other systems to use a multimaster OpenLdap
backend and implement TLS. Obviously the
first system
> > > Windows 95/98 machines. NT 4 with SP6 should not require this. So
> > > I would first disable lanman and plaintext on Domain A, and make sure it
> > > has not broken authentication with your NT4 machine.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> &
uld first disable lanman and plaintext on Domain A, and make sure it
> > has not broken authentication with your NT4 machine.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/14/2010 11:39 AM, Wikked one wrote:
> > > There are some differences when I run testparm -v.
> > > PDC
Domain A, and make sure it
> has not broken authentication with your NT4 machine.
>
>
>
> On 06/14/2010 11:39 AM, Wikked one wrote:
> > There are some differences when I run testparm -v.
> > PDC for Domain A
> > lanman auth=Yes
> > ntlm auth=Yes
> >
rom: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:31:58 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Domain Trusts with Samba 3.0.33 and 3.3.12
>
> If you run "testparm -v" on each, are the encryption parameters (NTLM etc)
> the same?
>
>
nal Message-
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
> On Behalf Of Wikked one
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 5:05 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Domain Trusts with Samba 3.0.33 and 3.3.12
>
>
>
>
>
> From: wikk...@hotmail.com
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:30:19 +
> Subject: [Samba] Domain Trusts
>
>
> Anybody?
>
> > Greetings List,
> >
> > I’ve
> > been attempting to establish a two way domain trust between Samba Domains.
> > The reasons
Anybody?
> Greetings List,
>
> I’ve
> been attempting to establish a two way domain trust between Samba Domains.
> The reasons why are numerous but mainly so
> that our Samba PDC supports Window7.
> Domain A is Samba 3.0.33 and domain B is Samba 3.3.12 and I’ve
> established t
Greetings List,
I’ve
been attempting to establish a two way domain trust between Samba Domains. The
reasons why are numerous but mainly so
that our Samba PDC supports Window7.
Domain A is Samba 3.0.33 and domain B is Samba 3.3.12 and I’ve
established that domain B trusts doma
Greetings List,
I’ve
been attempting to establish a two way domain trust between Samba Domains. The
reasons why are numerous but mainly so
that our Samba PDC supports Window7.
Domain A is Samba 3.0.33 and domain B is Samba 3.3.12 and I’ve
established that domain B trusts doma
Hi List,
I’ve
got a tricky task set out for me. We’re
using CentOS 4.8 as a Samba Domain Controller (3.0.33) yes I know it’s
ancient,but it’s solid. I need to update this to a version that will support
Windows7 work stations using domain security. I’m pretty sure I can bring th
Hi All,
If you've using yum and have added ftp.sernet.. to your yum.repos.d
the paths have changed.
The documentation on the Samba site is no longer accurate,I'm hoping someone
will update this once I mention it?
Thanks
Greetings List,
I've got 2 identical Samba Member servers on my
domain,of which the global
section of the smb.conf is identical.
My config file is below: The difference? One's a 64 bit OS the other is 32 (I
don't think this is the issue). The 32 bit system runs flawlessly,
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:53:42 -0500
> From: sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] ldap? Samba? Nss?
>
>
> Jamrock wrote:
> > wrote in message
> > news:1247.204.184.27.217.1251396091.squir...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us...
> >> It seems my logi
Work around maybe.
I created a samba user administrator on the system I wanted to access with a
mount command.
Which as it turns out is a little different ,you use a cifs mount in the fstab
with an auth.smb file to specify
username and password.
It seems as thought smbfs is no longer supported a
Warning
this will be a lengthy post. I’ve been beating my head on my desk for days now.
I
have a Samba PDC in an NT4 domain. I have several domain member servers and a
non domain member server.
Versions really don’t matter but for the sake of argument the
systems that are “working” are all CEN
[r...@vmsamba ~]# net rpc join -D MyDomain -Uadministrator%adminpasswd
Joined domain MyDomain.
Webmin is yet another admin tool but the command line returns domain joining
success.
The system shows up as a domain member in all of my Admin toolsI can access
the account database information (
Even though I have joined the domain with a net rpc join command
I can getent passwd just fine
wbinfo fails
using webmin to attempt to bind to the domain but it fails
Now I am truly confused!
I know you are typing administrator password, but if you look at the error
message, it says the user
Log level 10
Created a lot more noise still not able to isolate the problem
Here's some highlights of the huge log fileThis is also where I begin
to question the error messages...
[2009/07/26 10:33:58, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(326)
domain_client_validate: unable to validat
Additionally here's an error from the target system when I make an attempt to
mount CIFS from another system.
To refresh I am currently mounting a share with the mount -t smbfs.in order
to
backup to it, I have been unable to mount the share with either command.
As I look at the error message
)
pdb_increment_bad_password_count: pdb_get_account_policy failed.
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:19:07 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Samba] No responses, not a one?
> From: dresche...@gmail.com
> To: wikk...@hotmail.com
> CC: samba@lists.samba.org
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:14
Good Morning List,
After an upgrade to 3.3.6 on my CentOS 5.3 system I now
cannot access the share at all. I get the following console error message :
[2009/07/26 08:35:52, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smb_ldap_start_tls(656)
Failed to issue the StartTLS instruction: Connect erro
Subject: Re: [Samba] No responses, not a one?
>
> John H Terpstra - Samba Team wrote:
> > On 07/27/2009 01:41 PM, Wikked one wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > > I would love to update to the latest version ,nothing would make
>
Hi Guys,
I would love to update to the latest version ,nothing would make me
happier in fact.
However each time I've made an attempt to build samba without an RPM I've been
led
down the rabbit hole of dependencies ,so I've "learned" to use the version that
comes with the operating sys
Ok understood,thanks for the response!
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:46:55 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Samba] No responses, not a one?
> From: dresche...@gmail.com
> To: wikk...@hotmail.com; samba@lists.samba.org
>
> >I've asked about a couple issues on this list and now I'm wondering if
> > I'm se
Hi,
I've asked about a couple issues on this list and now I'm wondering if I'm
sending to the right address?
What's a guy got to do to get a response?
> Dear List,
>
>I’ve
> got a Samba NT4 domain with multiple samba member servers serving files using
> domain security. Cur
Dear List,
I’ve
got a Samba NT4 domain with multiple samba member servers serving files using
domain security. Current member servers are all running CentOS 4.7 with
3.0.28-0.el4.9
I have no issues (except aging) with these systems.
I’m upgrading a major file server with CentOS
Hi List,
During a recent power outage my domain controller froze at the bios
screen.
So for all intents and purposes there was no PDC (nor BDC) for the domain.
When I arrived on scene I restored order and rebooted the PDC,most machines were
not affected,however several NT4 systems as w
Hi Mark,
I think this is what you're looking for?
http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/acl.htm
http://aisalen.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/acls-on-samba/
This will allow you to emulate most NTFS attributes with your back up.
> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:51:49 +0100
> From: m...@campbell-lan
Hi List,
I wanted to provide the solution that proved to fix this problem.
On this particular server I observed we had consumed all memory resources and
were using a decent sized swap file.
After installing more RAM the problem & symptoms have disappeared. FINALLY I
have happy users.
L.
LiPi,
I too have user smbldap-tools with good success.
There is a nice little installer package (smbldap-configure)
that simplifies this process a little bit...
you can find a version that may be suitable for use here
http://majen.net/smbldap/
On another note this looks vaguely familiar a
Hi Daniel,
A couple quick items to check.
Make sure you have log level set to 2 or less. (unless you are troubleshooting)
Another parameter worth looking into is
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> From: muel...@tropenklinik.de
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> D
OK I did a little more testing until I created the failure to open on my test
server with
the debug level cranked up a little bit.
Here's an excerpt: I have bold formatted the areas I think are pertinent and
I'm hunting NT_STATUS
Any suggestions,thoughts,comments I'd appreciate it!
[2009/
Hi List,
Second
attempt to get this issue diagnosed and solved.
Samba Version 3.0.28el4
CentOS 4.7
The behavior is as follows when accessing Fox Pro dbf files.
Users can access the files through the Fox Pro command
interface without issues,when they choose a graphical environment (
Hi List,
We’re running
3.0.28.el4.9 on CentOS 4.7 in a production environment with one minor annoyance.
This is a very inconsistent behavior ,frequent enough top be annoying ,yet
unpredictable enough to warrant this email.
Our Samba server is serving up a wide variety of files but
37 matches
Mail list logo
