Re: [Samba] [Bulk] problems with samba upgrade from 3.5.4 to 3.6.9

I'm experiencing the same/similar problem the difference being it that ldap-backend users are ok, only root fails with NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION but I also get warnings, not sure if related WARNING: The idmap backend option is deprecated WARNING: The idmap uid option is deprecated

[Samba] failed to make ipc connection: NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION

hi all I cannot pinpoint the time when it broke, anyway, I for while been getting this NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION but I also get warnings, not sure if related WARNING: The idmap backend option is deprecated WARNING: The idmap uid option is deprecated WARNING: The idmap gid option is

[Samba] update target when source becomes a link pointing outside of the tree

hi everybody I posted to rsync mailing list but it's quiet there maybe here? just as in the subject update target when source becomes a link pointing outside of the tree command rsync -rptgoA --safe-links --delete-before --delete-excluded --exclude something I was hmm.. hoping I guess that,

[Samba] events eventlog pull (client)

hi all I see samba can push out it's event log in such a form that winstation can understand it, how about the opposite way? can samba controller pull/receive clients eventlog, or is it outside of its domain? and then it's for other manage/monitor/log solutions to take upon this subject.

[Samba] reg import via logon script

hi everybody I'm being trouble by a strange system behavior, it's Win 7 machine script it as simple as one line reg import Y:\IT\domainLogons\exportRaw.reg Y: is a net share that is mapped beforehand it does not get imported but below works just fine reg restore

[Samba] reg import via logon script

hi everybody I'm being trouble by a strange system behavior, it's Win 7 machine script it as simple as one line reg import Y:\IT\domainLogons\exportRaw.reg Y: is a net share that is mapped beforehand it does not get imported but below works just fine reg restore

Re: [Samba] reg import via logon script

I'm being troubled :) a trouble hopefully I ain't ;) On 16/11/12 16:38, lejeczek wrote: hi everybody I'm being trouble by a strange system behavior, it's Win 7 machine script it as simple as one line reg import Y:\IT\domainLogons\exportRaw.reg Y: is a net share that is mapped beforehand

Re: [Samba] 3.2.15 sys_get_vfs_quota -- failed for mntpath[ a device ] bdev [ a device ] qtype[4] id[513]: Invalid argument

[4] id[513]: Invalid argument On 25/05/12 08:54, lejeczek wrote: or/and ... qtype[2] id[501]: Invalid argument above version of samba does not seem to be able to recognize FS(ext4) quotas, could you gents.ladies shed some light please? very much appreciated. regards -- To unsubscribe from

[Samba] 3.2.15 sys_get_vfs_quota -- failed for mntpath[ a device ] bdev [ a device ] qtype[4] id[513]: Invalid argument

or/and ... qtype[2] id[501]: Invalid argument above version of samba does not seem to be able to recognize FS(ext4) quotas, could you gents.ladies shed some light please? very much appreciated. regards -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:

[Samba] 3.2.7 vs 3.5 locking logic/mechanism - locking denied to non-owners

hi everybody I'm hoping some experts could shed a bit more light on the subject I cannot work it out and it's potentially quite a hassle win xp sp3 client samba 3.2.7 on sles 11 samba 3.5.10 on rhel 6.1 and one app the the front end to a user, that does not write anything back to the resure

Re: [Samba] [Bulk] 3.2.7 vs 3.5 locking logic/mechanism - locking denied to non-owners

if I level up the logs on 3.5 : fetch_share_mode_unlocked: no share_mode record around (file not open) on 3.2.7 : is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=1733591040 len=61440 unlocked for fnum 10659 file any thoughts? On 25/04/12 13:53, lejeczek wrote: hi everybody I'm hoping some

[Samba] fetch_share_mode_unlocked no share_mode record around (file not open)

hello everybody I've have a silly windows app, java based, that complains always when sourcing from read-only share complains like this .. File is in-use by another process .. now, app does not write anything back to the share thus share is 'read-only' plus there are some other reasons for

[Samba] mode mask

dear all trivial kind of question for which I do apologize, but it's sort of puzzling in a share when a windows client creates something samba sets it as 755, yet another user can still delete, in this case a folder which part of configuration fixes it so it would behave as expected?

Re: [Samba] mode mask

, at file creation time? many thanks On 30/03/12 11:30, lejeczek wrote: dear all trivial kind of question for which I do apologize, but it's sort of puzzling in a share when a windows client creates something samba sets it as 755, yet another user can still delete, in this case a folder

[Samba] smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Invalid argument) - in 3.5.6

hi everybody this happens when a Domain Admin adds a user-permission set via properties/security in Windows folder_A was created by a Domain Admin new permission - Modify - was added over the folder_A to the user_A user_A created a file_A.txt in folder_A now Domain Admin goes back to the

Re: [Samba] mode mask

if using setfacl does the same) On 30/03/12 13:33, Aaron E. wrote: you can set default permissions on the share folder using something like this.. setfacl -m default:group:gid:perms folder -- default perms are inherited.. On 03/30/2012 07:29 AM, lejeczek wrote: actually it gets even more weird

[Samba] mangle a character or forbid/prohibit it's use when creating files/folders

hi everybody is it possible at all? thanks Pawel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] parent folder rX - child file in it rwx = child file from windows read only????

dear everybody samba is 3.5.11-79.fc14 is this weird or my logic fails, I was hoping that if a file has unix 770 then Win clients should be able to write to it even if parent folder is 750 also if a folder is 770 and a Win client creates a new folder in it, its unix permissions get set to

Re: [Samba] [Bulk] parent folder rX - child file in it rwx = child file from windows read only????

700 in order to protect it from deletion by non-owners and the smb.conf is pretty basic what am I missing??? On 11/01/2011 01:25 PM, lejeczek wrote: dear everybody samba is 3.5.11-79.fc14 is this weird or my logic fails, I was hoping that if a file has unix 770 then Win clients should

[Samba] bdc denies a user permission to write when accessing from a workstation

hello everybody I am hoping someone could share on this, weir to me looking situation, some thoughts when a user accesses BDC share from a workstation writes are denied but this same user can, tested with smbclient, write locally and from the PDC and another thing is when smbclient -L PDC

[Samba] differences between 3.5.6-86.el6_1.4 and 3.5.11-79.fc14 and file is in-use

dear everybody two OSes, two Sambas, same settings, same shared conted and one Java application, that complains about File is in-use by another process. sambas are two different versions, only other difference is SElinux, 'disabled' and on the box that causes problems is 'permissive' I would

Re: [Samba] [Bulk] differences between 3.5.6-86.el6_1.4 and 3.5.11-79.fc14 and file is in-use

I can see I might have not been obvious in my first email, to rectify obscureness 3.5.6-86.el6_1.4, selinux=disabled = Java app does NOT complain 3.5.11-79.fc14, selinux=permissive = Java COMPLAINS same configs for both Sambas On 10/20/2011 03:54 PM, lejeczek wrote: dear everybody two OSes