attributed to sendfile.
The overall cost of gettimeofday seems to be less than 1% here and would
be smaller in a more realistic mix.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are rejected).
Does anyone know if there is a service pack for the first problem?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:33:33AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into a problem with a Win2K machine where if multiple
connections occur on port 445, when the first one issues a NegProt, the
rest get a reset
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:49:55AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
It's the NegProt. Once the first NegProt is issued on any open TCP
connection, all the others get RSTs if they have not got past that point.
It is bizare. They come from
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
am just curious why its going for port 445 ?
NetBIOS-less SMB.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Are all these things strictly local decisions or are they now all encoded
in groups, or are there some capability bits associated with users?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to find out today by asking Samba's profiling stuff how many reads
and writes were seen and how many bytes were read and written.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[NON-Text Body part not included]
These messages that only consist of a PGP encoded piece are getting damn
annoying.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, it is like UID and GID array in UNIX. It can then be used to
quickly and easily make access decisions when objects have ACLs attached
to them.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACEs match, the Everyone ACE is checked.
Lastly, the MASK is checked and if any bits in the RPERM are not present
in the MASK, access is denied.
Is this correct?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bytes as the test reports!
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate the timeouts
that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and count those up.
Given that the resolution of the dead time parameter is in minutes, this
would seem to not get too far out of whack.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe
: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with OpLock break requests and
responses, which I also see.
This seems to be a problem. Has anyone seen anything like that?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a full
capture is larger than 334 MBytes (that capture dropped a few frames).
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to come
-- Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, The Weeping Song
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
status code
Ok, looks like we mostly agree, so the only thing I'd change on yours is:
-the long don't know is the domain guid...I'm sure of this.
So why are there ptrs before two of the strings but not the first one?
They are possibly top-level refs.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL
as the total that are currently kept.
2. Slight changes to the macros to do the accounting.
All this could be protected by an ifdef that allowed you to switch it on
if you want that level of profiling or off if you don't want to take the
performance hit.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL
.
Please contribute back anything useful you come up with.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
://www.serverworks.com/products/GCHE.html
Thanks for these useful options.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ops, which
then call VFS ops that were not using their own nested profiling macros.
Should yet another hack be added to this festering sore, of should a more
generalized structure be added?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
You might already know this, but www.dice.com with a search of any of
Samba, CIFS, SMB, NFS turns up lots of jobs at NAS-like companies :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
making available.
[1]The document has gotten lost at the moment, but should be back up soon.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to test the multi=interface stuff I want to put into
cifs-load-gen and find where its limits are from a load-generation point
of view.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Is libsmbclient not built for these conditions ..?
Is there any other API which would take care of this ??
If you send me the smallest possible program that demonstrates the
problem, I *might* be able to look into it or find someone to look into
it.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL
into Samba 2.2.X, but should be fair game for
Samba 3.0.x
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is the
relative ID, however, for all ACL purposes, they should be stored as the
full DOMAIN-SID and RID, ie as above.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is different from that, then I would
like to request that the smb.conf manual page be updated.
Oh wow. A volunteer :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Jörg
Thank you for this information ... The discussion has been productive as
well.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
parts of smbtorture have been extracted from Samba, so it is possible
that the rest might be able to be as well. Catch me on #qa :-)
thanks,
gary
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, what version of Samba. Also, do you have the config.cache from when
you built Samba?
Samba should map domain admins to a local group number from winbindd, and
should use that.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
accepts just SHARE as does
Samba.
Those of you who are doing NAS products will be happy that the code runs
against NetApp now, I am sure :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
serves,
we look up DOMAIN#1C.
In order to do the node status, you first have to have an IP or DNS name
for the node you want to query. How is that obtained?
WINS or DNS once you have found the NetBIOS name of the DC.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
often) and it uses SMB code Copyright (C)
Richard Sharpe 1996. I'd really love to use some current code for it!
Sigh, yes, that code got away :-(
I've already found the function domain_client_validate() in
domain_client_validate.c. However, this file seems to unused currently as
it isn't
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
It's actually NTLMSSP base-64 encoded in http headers.
There has been much discussion about this on this list and on
#samba-technical and it may already be possible or close
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it. It
is one of the udp ports - 139 I think.
Also from memory, but I believe that Win9X does that as well. I think name
lookup requests to a Win9X machine are sent back to port 137.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, you might also have to run 'make
proto'.
This is off the top of my head, so I make no guarantees that it will
work.
If no one else suggests anything better by the time I get to work, I might
look at it further :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Ernst Cozijnsen wrote:
It also happens without the --with-fhs option
It sounds like a general failure to detect the presence of those two
routines in the configure script.
If its a failure to who should i turn
of that at module load time.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Manuel Guerrero wrote:
Hello List,
I have a Win2k-Server and a Linux-Server. I want to backup the Win2k
Files on the Linux Box with smbtar.
It works quite well. But when I try to restore a file it happend
Tom,
Do you have a small sample program that uses the new functionality in
libsmbclient?
I need some tests to ensure that it does what it is supposed to do.
If I had time, I would resurrect the regression tests that Caldera did.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
, but why
would you ask the SAM for such a thing?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unicode names for CIFS as
well as 8,3 names for CIFS, and, maybe, ascii names for UNIX clients). But
then searching becomes more difficult.
So, there are problems ... but some people would like to solve them.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
At 3:24 PM -0700 7/7/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
I want to preserve case sensitive behaviour for NFS and UNIX clients,
while reducing the current high cost to CIFS users of providing
case-insensitive behaviour.
You mean, you want case-sensitive clients
, but for the moment, that is how I have implemented it
(unpublished) in FreeBSD as well. But then my problem is a little more
difficult. I had to field callback breaks breaking delegations I have been
given in a multi-protocol distributed yadda-yadda mumble frotz.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Hmmm, I am going to need to be involved in this as well :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
implications, I think, for a distributed file system.
Then, from the UNIX side, I created FOO~1.C. This succeeded! Under
Windows, I got FOO~~1.C. Interesting.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Conrad Minshall wrote:
At 7:19 PM -0700 7/4/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
The current situation with respect to preserve case = yes and case
sensitive = no causes many problems.
I recently ran a build of a lot of software under Windows that was mounted
on a file
in the latter
branch).
It would be nice if the two were in step, though, as far as libsmbclient
is concerned.
I'll post some summary information on branch maintainence later today.
My fault for not doing so sooner.
cheers, jerry
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sharpe'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
Don't step at that point. The process has already run the CPU into the wrong
segment, or accessed memory using a bad pointer. Stepping will only destroy
information.
Do a 'bt' instead
in INS by default.
David E. Shapiro
Senior Unix Admin
BTi - the future of communications
4300 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, NC 27609
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
connect to th DC (ie, name lookup fails).
David
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:08 PM
To: David Shapiro
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: sessionid.tdb missing after build and client read failutre
On Mon, 1
with a mangled
name.
now try to do that in a directory with 10.000 files and not timeout ...
Now that is an interesting number. I am seeing all sorts of interesting
N^2 behaviour on a file system I am working with ATM up to about 6,000
files and after that, linear.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Ulf Bertilsson wrote:
Anybody with an tarball laying around ? :)
I have one. I can mail it to you soon, if you would like.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
received this message by error, please notify us
immediately, return the original mail to the sender and delete the
message from your system.
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
file names like *, EDIT*, EDIT, EDIT.pif, ~xxx.tmp etc...
can anybody tell me the reason behind this? or any explanation regarding
this?
Ummm, have you ever looked at the CRAP that windows generates on the wire?
You can do so with Ethereal.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Raghu Iyer wrote:
Can I get a copy of the same ?
Hmmm, so there are people at Kuokoa :-)
After I have applied the patches, I will send you a copy, but it should be
available via CVS.
Regards, Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL
CIFS Load Generator
Developed for SNIA CIFS Benchmarking Working Group
Richard Sharpe
Panasas, Inc Samba Team
11-Jun-2002
INTRO
This is a short document on how to use the code and where it came from.
BACKGROUND
This code has been extracted from Samba's smbtorture utility.
It is now up
://niihau.student.utwente.nl/~sketch/libsmbc2-1.diff
OK, I won't get to this until next week now after I come back from Disney
...
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
areas have I missed.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Juergen Hasch wrote:
Hi,
this is a simple backport of Andrew Bartlett's mutex fix from HEAD to 2.2.5.
It fixes spurious authentication failures when using
? The client should ask the DC
to translate the SIDs to names.
I can't remember exactly why that was happening now, but I've seen it :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for your domain?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Richard, the samba-technical people) have any suggestions, speak.
OK. I will wait for the patch ...
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ...
It does not seem that connect_to_domain_password_server handles
multi-homed DCs. It always tries the one address returned, and it that
address happens to be unreachable ... problems ensue ...
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi ...
It does not seem that connect_to_domain_password_server handles
multi-homed DCs. It always tries the one address returned, and it that
address happens to be unreachable ... problems ensue
or a WIP on our load generator :-) presented at
CIFS2002 ...
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
any kernel sources they had :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
French's package when it becomes available.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the code into
libsmb, but that is still an issue for things like smbfs, I believe
because of the amount of junk that might get dragged in.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Has it been checked on FreeBSD? If not, if you give me the source, I will
check it for you.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
What platform is this on?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
experiment.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add an additional flag to both name_query and
node_status_query.
This flag will return the value of the Recursion Available flag in the
nmb packet header.
I am sure
things called books, that will help. One I can suggest is
Special Edition, Using Samba.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
On 2002.05.07 04:46, Richard Sharpe wrote:
What version of Samba? Have you made any mods to Samba?
2.2.4. No mods.
OK ...
Configured with
# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-quotas --with-msdfs --with-included-popt
--with-acl
incompatible pointer type.
Also, a lot of messages like this:
gcc: unrecognized option '-KPIC'
I think Jerry is fixing this. It is something like -fPIC under gcc, so you
could try changing the Makefile to reflect that and get back to us.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 04:16:10PM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Windows clients send out a GetDC request to the NetLogon named pipe. We
don't, at present.
We have code to do this that was dropped due to the Windows server
only replying
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Christoph Kaegi wrote:
On 2002.05.04 04:34, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Well, all of the stuff you talk about below is actually RPC traffic. So,
the question is, why does it need to do this stuff prior to copying a file
to a share or accessing a share.
Do you have
._tcp.pdc._msdcs.DnsDomainName. host or dig
should be able to do the work.
You can find more information from the google search engine with Windows
2000 DNS.
Hope this can help.
Elia
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: venerdì 3
is that ?
Naveed
- Original Message -
From: Robert F. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Naveed Ahmed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:24 PM
Subject: RE: 2.0.6 Problem
Has the user been entered into the SAMBA
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Robert F. Thomas wrote:
That is exciting news, since it is totally undocumented that SAMBA 2.0.3 on
OpenVMS supports encrypted passwords.
Oops. I may have miss-spoke with respect to Samba on 2.0.3. I don't use
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Suhasini Rao wrote:
Please unsubscribe
If you wish to leave the list, then you may do so using the instructions
at the end of each mail message.
However, asking us to all unsubscribe is a bit rich!
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
and minor numbers are not important unless you are building a device
driver.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
am using a slightly older snapshot of 2.2.3 (2.2.3pre) and it also works
with password server = *.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for connecting to a server
does not.
Of the three, one and three are easiest, and the code is left as an
exercise for the reader :-)
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
501 - 592 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
