Please help! I am getting awesome read
performance from my samba server, but writing to it is terrible.
My server configuration is SUN Ultra 2 dual 400 mhz
CPUs (Solaris 8 64bit mode) 1 gig of ram and dual 100 meg network cards running
samba 2.2.6
windows box is XP home, 1 gig AMD with 384
You know the default tuning parameters we ship should just
work, especially in 2.2.7.
Try removing the following paramters and seeing if it helps.
Jeremy.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:41:25AM -0600, Justin Richards wrote:
[global]
read size = 65535
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
You know the default tuning parameters we ship should just
work, especially in 2.2.7.
Try removing the following paramters and seeing if it helps.
Jeremy.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:41:25AM
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:24:16PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote:
I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary
server information and still no difference. read speed still very good,
write speed still way below par.
Ok, now you have to do some work to profile the
is attached with fast-wide scsi)
I'm going to recompile 2.2.7 and see if I get any different results..
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:39:14PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote:
using iostat and doing some basic file testing such as:
time dd if=/dev/zero of=./tst bs=8192 count=8192
time dd if=./tst of=/dev/null bs=8192 count=8192
my write speed was about 13.5 meg a sec, and read was 13 meg a sec.
I
version of solaris? that
is the only other major change other than the faster hardware..
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem
Justin,
What type of performance do you get when putting a file to the server
using FTP? Or NFS for that matter? If there is a networking issue
other than Samba, you should see slow write performance using those
protocols as well Samba will probably be close to NFS in speed,
with both
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
Justin,
What type of performance do you get when putting a file to the server
using FTP? Or NFS for that matter? If there is a networking
: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary
server information and still no difference. read speed still very good,
write speed still way below par.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Justin
10 matches
Mail list logo
