On Dienstag, 18. August 2009 wrote jw:
Hello
I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and
'inherit owner'.
By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this
share, its permissions are not quite what I need.
Therefore, I try to use 'force directory mode'
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Harry Jedewalk2...@arcor.de wrote:
On Dienstag, 18. August 2009 wrote jw:
Is this correct behavior, or a bug?
You should try posix acls. Read the man pages:
getfacl
setfacl
acl
or search this list archiv. Look for default acl.
I have not used ACLs much,
On 8/18/2009, jw (jwde...@gmail.com) wrote:
directory mask = 0775
The reason you're not getting 775 perms on the new directory
is that the default directory mask is 0755, which masks out
the write permission for the group.
Just setting inherit owner, and directory mask = 0775
should be
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Charles
Marcuscmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
? He said 0775, not 7775
Well, I need the sticky bit set (see my previous reply).
So I have tried 1775, 3775, and 7775, all with the same results.
If I use 0775, the sticky bit is masked out, which will not work
John,
The following quote comes from the SWAT description of the inherit
permissions parameter.
From the way it is written, it seems quite plausible that it also
applies to inherit owner.
inherit permissions (S)
Note that the setuid bit is /never/ set via inheritance (the code
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:09:00PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
To allow these to apply to the new directory, set :
directory mask = 0775
The reason you're not getting 775 perms on the new directory
is that the default directory
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:09:00PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
To allow these to apply to the new directory, set :
directory mask = 0775
The reason you're not getting 775 perms on the new directory
is that the default directory
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dale
Schroederd...@briannassaladdressing.com wrote:
John,
The following quote comes from the SWAT description of the inherit
permissions parameter.
From the way it is written, it seems quite plausible that it also applies to
inherit owner.
inherit
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Ok, this works with 3.4.0. You need to set:
inherit owner = yes
inherit permissions = yes
directory mask = 07775
Isn't that one too many characters in the mask?
Regardless, I tried 07775 (as
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:02 PM, jwjwde...@gmail.com wrote:
What I am interested in is the sticky bit - getting that inherited.
The docs only mention the sticky bit with regard to permissions.
Whoops - that should read with regard to *printer* permissions
-John
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:29:51PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Ok, this works with 3.4.0. You need to set:
inherit owner = yes
inherit permissions = yes
directory mask = 07775
Isn't that one too many
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:29:51PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Would you mind showing me your full config for your working case, and
the directory permissions /
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:41:51PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:29:51PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Would you mind showing me your full config for
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Well I'm creating the directory with a logged in user
of jra, who is in the eng group. I don't think the
setting of the guest account has anything to do with
it as I'm not logging in as guest at all.
Hmm.. Well I switched
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 02:16:54PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Well I'm creating the directory with a logged in user
of jra, who is in the eng group. I don't think the
setting of the guest account has anything to do with
it as
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Not happening on my system. The inherit owner works
as specified.
What OS are you running?
I have tried on a second FreeBSD-7.2 system, with
never-before-installed samba 3.2, and it does not work there either.
-John
--
To
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 07:55:45PM -0700, jw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
Not happening on my system. The inherit owner works
as specified.
What OS are you running?
I have tried on a second FreeBSD-7.2 system, with
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:48 AM, jwjwde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and
'inherit owner'.
By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this
share, its permissions are not quite what I need.
Therefore, I try to use
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:48:04PM -0700, jw wrote:
Hello
I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and
'inherit owner'.
By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this
share, its permissions are not quite what I need.
Therefore, I try to use 'force
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jeremy Allisonj...@samba.org wrote:
To allow these to apply to the new directory, set :
directory mask = 0775
The reason you're not getting 775 perms on the new directory
is that the default directory mask is 0755, which masks out
the write permission for
Hello
I am trying to create a 'dropbox' share, using the sticky bit and
'inherit owner'.
By themselves they work, but when a directory is created in this
share, its permissions are not quite what I need.
Therefore, I try to use 'force directory mode' or 'inherit permissions'.
However, whenever I
21 matches
Mail list logo
