Hi guys I have strange case.
One network is based on Samba 3.0.x + LDAP PDC. Centos 5.8 i386.
This server have the mail: dovecot-ldap+postfix.
Everything is working good, my clients are Windows XP Pro, roaming
profiles, etc.
I have receive my first Win7 machine and I need to update samba
Hi folks,
I research at the moment a connection over fuse and samba for
hadoop-cluster. Its my private playground, but I have some issues I can't
figure out why they happen.
I use RHEL5.7, packetlist:
rpm -qa|grep samba
samba-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64
samba-common-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64
2
Hi folks,
I research at the moment a connection over fuse and samba for
hadoop-cluster. Its my private playground, but I have some issues I can't
figure out why they happen.
I use RHEL5.7, packetlist:
rpm -qa|grep samba
samba-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64
samba-common-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64
2
Hi,
fixed.
/case closed
I write monday a article about.
- alex
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:40 AM, alo alt wget.n...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I research at the moment a connection over fuse and samba for
hadoop-cluster. Its my private playground, but I have some issues I can't
figure
Hi List,
I have an appliance (the client) which mounts a CIFS share from a
Samba server - the Samba server usually runs on an Ubuntu system.
Within the client, the root user executes a mount command like this:
mount.cifs \\UBUNTUSERVER\archive /tmp/Default \
-o
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:02 +0100, Seb James wrote:
Hi List,
I have an appliance (the client) which mounts a CIFS share from a
Samba server - the Samba server usually runs on an Ubuntu system.
Within the client, the root user executes a mount command like this:
mount.cifs
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 20:21 +0100, Seb James wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:02 +0100, Seb James wrote:
Hi List,
I have an appliance (the client) which mounts a CIFS share from a
Samba server - the Samba server usually runs on an Ubuntu system.
Within the client, the root user
Hi,
depending on the enhancements in samba 3.3 compared to smaba 3.0 (shiped
versions with Red Hat EL 5.x) I think about updating our samba system.
Independent from that update I'd switch the passdb backend to LDAP.
My question: In regard to a samba update is there anything special to
consider
Hi Everyone,
I am using Debian Lenny, and recently upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.2.5.
Everything use to be working fine, now I keep getting this error:
:~# smbclient -L 192.168.64.20 -U test
Enter test's password:
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_WORKSTATION
I have been looking around the
I have configured a Linux server so users can log in with their AD
credentials. However, I have a directory I would like to share and
restrict it to a few AD users. All these users will have read and
execute access but only two users will have write access.
The /srv/www/vhosts/marketing is the
Hi,
I have a similar problem, no ADS in my setup, just no
supplementary groups showing
up (samba 3.2.1 and groups ldap in nsswitch.conf as opposed to working
with Samba 3.0.28 and groups nis in nsswitch.conf)
Solaris 10 SPARC
Everything looks ok, getent, groups user etc when logged in
le : Mardi, 19 Août 2008, 14h02mn 38s
Objet : Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.x access rights issue with secondary groups or
Unix rights
Hi,
I have a similar problem, no ADS in my setup, just no
supplementary groups showing
up (samba 3.2.1 and groups ldap in nsswitch.conf as opposed
: samba@lists.samba.org
Envoyé le : Mardi, 19 Août 2008, 14h02mn 38s
Objet : Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.x access rights issue with secondary groups or
Unix rights
Hi,
I have a similar problem, no ADS in my setup, just no
supplementary groups showing
up (samba 3.2.1 and groups ldap
: [Samba] Samba 3.0.x access rights issue with secondary
groups or Unix rights
Someone more knowledgeable may correct me, but I'd guess you have to fix
that,
if Solaris isn't picking up secondary groups for a user, I'd think Samba
won't find
them either.
On my systems id -a returns all
De : Duncan Brannen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : samba@lists.samba.org
Envoyé le : Mardi, 19 Août 2008, 15h28mn 47s
Objet : Re: Re : [Samba] Samba 3.0.x access rights issue with secondary groups
or Unix rights
Someone more knowledgeable may correct me, but I'd guess you have to fix
Hi experts
I have a trouble in access rights
I am running Samba
3.0.31 on Solaris 10 x86 64 bits as member server of an Active
Directory 2003 R2 domain (MYDOMAIN) using Identity Management for Unix
I set rights to access a sub folder of a Samba share. On Solaris the user
toto jdoe can write a
Hallo, John,
Du (jht) meintest am 02.08.08:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style
domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Since 2004, in some hundreds LANs.
security = user
passdb backend = smbpasswd
(since 2007 tdbsam)
and no winbind
I
We finally got Samba working. It seems it just didn't like letting the
Windows XP box log onto the network when the system's user ID was not
part of the trusted Admins group... of course, I had to promote the
privileges manually, and it worked fine. I was just trying to add the
machine to
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style domain,
with the Samba box operating as the PDC?
--
Jason A. Nunnelley
JasonN.com is my website - all opinions expressed were mine at some point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions
Jason A. Nunnelley wrote:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style
domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Yes, indeed. For a little over two years now. CentOS-4.X based,
Slackware-10.2 - 12.0, and at one point Debian Sarge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Jason A. Nunnelley wrote:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style domain, with
the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Yes indeedy, with the ldapsam backend and two BDC's, on three Dell
PE2900's with CentOS 4.6. About 180 clients. Very solid.
Steve
, and I think it's time to
do a re-install.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve Thompson
Sent: Sat 8/2/2008 3:07 PM
To: Jason A. Nunnelley
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Successfully running NT4 type domain on Samba 3.0 as PDC?
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Jason A. Nunnelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style domain, with
the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Yes, since 2002 or 2003 with redhat then gentoo since 2004.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Hallo, Jason,
Du (jason) meintest am 02.08.08:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style
domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Since 2004, in some hundreds LANs.
security = user
passdb backend = smbpasswd
(since 2007 tdbsam)
and no winbind
Viele
On Saturday 02 August 2008 22:15:00 Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Jason,
Du (jason) meintest am 02.08.08:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style
domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Since 2004, in some hundreds LANs.
security = user
passdb backend
Hi Team,
If there is any way to migrate from Samba 3.0 domain to windows 2003 AD, please
help me.
Please send the procedures how to do this transperently without any changes at
the users side.
There is no roaming profile. All are locally created domain profile.
Thanks and Regards
Hello,
I wan't to migrate accounts, roaming profiles and other shares from Samba
2.2 (Slackware) to Samba 3.0.23 (Debian).
It should be transparent for clients. I migrated linux user accounts,
smbpasswd file, smb.conf and domain SID. I can join new client to the new
domain and it works, but
I compile Samba for the first time on LINUX (SLES 10) and
have a weird libpthread warning message.
I dug the list to find some explanations about the way I have
to handle this problem, without success.
Below are the 'configure' parameters and the part of config.log about
libpthread.
Is there
Hello Friends,
We are using Samba 3.0 for our domain. Staff login with their roaming
profiles and the profiles are not that big. Something happened yesterday and
now all the clients are taking more time than normal while loggin off. I
have tried rebooting the Samba server and checked all
contact_mahajan wrote:
[snip]
I verifies va/log/messages on the server and every thing seems to be normal.
Please suggest me that where else I should look in order to troublehoot this
issue? What could be the other reasons for this sudden slowness.
First step in network delays is to check DNS
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
contact_mahajan
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:35 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles
Hi,
I dont have samba with LDAP.
I took out \scripts\ part from logon script part
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
contact_mahajan
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:35 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles
Hi,
I dont have samba with LDAP.
I took out \scripts\ part from logon script part in GLOBAL settings. ALso
I created a script
contact_mahajan schrieb:
Also regarding my logon script, my smb.conf fille says like this:
[GLOBAL]
..
logon script = scripts\login.bat
.
[netlogon]
...
path= /var/samba/netlogon/%U
This definition is trying to be subtle by defining a per-user-netlogon share,
as %U
2823531 FAX: +49 6421 2826994
Uni Marburg, HRZ, Hans-Meerwein-Str., D-35032 Marburg, Germany
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Samba
guessing
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
contact_mahajan
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles
Hi,
I dont have samba with LDAP.
I took out \scripts
, 2007 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles
Hi,
I dont have samba with LDAP.
I took out \scripts\ part from logon script part in GLOBAL settings.
ALso
I created a script for a particular test user (script name is same as
login
name). I
Hello friends,
I am running Samba 3.0 on RHEL4 server. Around 200 roaming profiles are also
configured and they login to XP machines. Things are working for us except
in network rollout scenarios. We dont know how to roll out patches or some
global changes to all the profiles. We have to visit
contact_mahajan schrieb:
I will appreciate if you can please suggest me something. I can script a
batch file to map the network drives. But dont know how my to automate this
at the logon for all the profiles.
Have you ever tried a login script?
Kind regards,
Wolfgang Ratzka
--
To
contact_mahajan wrote:
Hello friends,
I am running Samba 3.0 on RHEL4 server. Around 200 roaming profiles are also
configured and they login to XP machines. Things are working for us except
in network rollout scenarios. We dont know how to roll out patches or some
global changes to all
://www.nabble.com/Samba-3.0-and-XP-roaming-profiles-tf3561201.html#a9947378
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
contact_mahajan
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:06 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 and XP roaming profiles
Thanks for the suggestion.
I havn't tried login scripts. I can create a login script and put it under
the base
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:23:56PM +0100, Michael Gasch wrote:
would you advise against the usage of NSFv4 and samba running on the
same GPFS cluster node? since we´re running older versions of samba
(original SLES10/ RHEL4 packages) the code could be not developed
enough in this manner...
hi list,
we have plans to implement GPFS in our heterogeneous environment (win,
linux and mac clients; many linux servers) to scale better in file
serving and improve availability.
are there any recommendations regarding samba and GPFS and samba
co-existing with NFSv4 (ACLs!) on GPFS on the same
Hi all,
we want to migrate our samba-data from 32-bit to 64-bit environment.
We use LDAP as passdb. In our LDAP-Directory (OpenLDAP) we store
users, groups, computers.
The LDAP-Directory is already running on the new 64-bit server.
smbd and nmbd were started. The login works.
What we have
we want to migrate our samba-data from 32-bit to 64-bit environment.
We use LDAP as passdb. In our LDAP-Directory (OpenLDAP) we store
users, groups, computers.
The LDAP-Directory is already running on the new 64-bit server.
smbd and nmbd were started. The login works.
What we have to do
Hi all,
I have a Samba 3.0.20b installation on a Redhat 9 system running as PDC
for a Windows Domain. I now would like to move the PDC funktionality to
an existing Debian Sarge system running Samba 3.0.23c and then
decommision the Redhat system.
I did search for information on how to do this but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/27/2006 09:53 AM, Buehl, Reiner (HPS EMEA GD-CI) escreveu:
Hi all,
I have a Samba 3.0.20b installation on a Redhat 9 system running as PDC
for a Windows Domain. I now would like to move the PDC funktionality to
an existing Debian Sarge
I have a Samba 3.0.20b installation on a Redhat 9 system
running as PDC
for a Windows Domain. I now would like to move the PDC
funktionality to
an existing Debian Sarge system running Samba 3.0.23c and then
decommision the Redhat system.
What type of backend are you using?
I
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:23:12PM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
Perhaps, this [1]entry in the FAQ of Samba Wiki can
help you to define what you should backup. Anyway, if you are
able to install the new machine and test it, you can pretty
safe copy the files and do some tests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am currently running Samba 3.0.11 compiled for HP-UX 11i (PA2.0). I am
looking at upgrading to the most current version of Samba, but I see
that HP has finally caught up with the rest of the planet and is now
offering 3.0.22 with select fixes from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/26/2006 01:48 PM, Mountz, Charles escreveu:
I just upgraded from samba 2.2.8 to Samba 3.0. The upgrade coincided with
upgrading from UnixWare 7.1.1 to 7.1.4. I can map a network drive just
fine with 2.2.8 but cannot with 3.0. I try
I just upgraded from samba 2.2.8 to Samba 3.0. The upgrade coincided with
upgrading from UnixWare 7.1.1 to 7.1.4. I can map a network drive just fine
with 2.2.8 but cannot with 3.0. I try to enter the user1 id and password and
it just rejects it each time.
Here is my smb.conf file
Hey Guys,
I have trying to build Samba 3.0 with ADS support on Solaris 9. This is how
I am trying to configure samba:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba \
--with-ldap \
--enable-static \
--with-ads \
--with-krb5
On 6/7/06, Jagga Soorma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,
I have trying to build Samba 3.0 with ADS support on Solaris 9. This is
how
I am trying to configure samba:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba \
--with-ldap \
--enable-static
this is only a stop gap until samba + ADS build is sorted out so
if anyone has any ideas on what is happening or what to do I would
really appreciate the help.
Cheers,
Neil
Jagga Soorma wrote:
Hey Guys,
I have trying to build Samba 3.0 with ADS support on Solaris 9. This is
how
I am trying
We have two solaris 9 boxes with Samba 3.0.20, which authenticate
against a solaris 8 box with Samba 2.2.8a. My question is about
the /usr/local/samba/private files secret.tbd and smbpasswd. We
initially copied the smbpasswd from the 2.2.8a to the newer ones,
but it is not often kept up to date.
hi,
I want to migrate the samba PDC server release 2.7 to samba PDC server
release 3.0
Knowing that we use LDAP for all account and authentification how to
migrate also the SID so i have not to reintégrate the machine in the
domaine. Are there some tools that does that.
If someone have
Quoting Josh Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds like you might be running into the issue described here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=113207146109418w=2
Thanks for pointing that out. The pwdLastSet attribute was indeed set
to 0 on all accounts which made Samba delete the attributes
Hi list,
I am having some issues migrating a Samba 2.2 installation to Samba
3.0. I am using the LDAP backend and converted the LDAP database to the
new schema using the provided convertSambaAccount script. As far as I
can tell that worked fine. The new ldif file has everything
On 11/15/05, Daniel Bramkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having some issues migrating a Samba 2.2 installation to Samba
3.0. I am using the LDAP backend and converted the LDAP database to the
new schema using the provided convertSambaAccount script. As far as I
can tell that worked fine
I just upgrade from Samba 2.2.7a on RH9 to Samba
3.0.14a on FC4, all other clients are happy but the
DOS ones: they cannot launch the .bat files. From
sniffer capture, it seems that the server return a
filename in lower case which is unacceptable to DOS
client.
I tried to mangle with 'unix
Hey,
I have AIX5.2 running with en_US ( ISO8859-1) as charset (see smitty
shot bellow).
Change/Show Cultural Convention,
Language, or Keyboard
Primary CULTURAL convention ISO8859-1 English
(United States) [en_US]
To the Authors,
I've been using samba for many years, and have not read the 3.0
manual until now. I just wanted to say how impressed I am with the very
high quality of it. Thanks to all of you who have made the documentation
as great as samba itself.
Cheers,
-C
--
To unsubscribe from
Try using ip address instead anf see if that works :)
//henrik
15 okt 2005 kl. 13.10 skrev Sunil Kumar:
Hi all,
when I am tring to connect to my linux
share using linux for
ex: smbclient //linuxspan/kerberos -U suneel - where as linuxspan
is host
name and kerberos is a share name and
Hi all,
when I am tring to connect to my linux
share using linux for
ex: smbclient //linuxspan/kerberos -U suneel - where as linuxspan is host
name and kerberos is a share name and suneel is ads user.
I am getting this error : tree connect failed : NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME.
pls help me on
Hi,
This seems familuar to me..
Now, here comes the real problem:
- The user can now log on, except that all of Windows' settings were
gone, and back to the default.
- The profile *was* downloaded to the local machine, and all the files
were present, but it acted as if the registry somehow
]
Verzonden: dinsdag 11 oktober 2005 11:17
Aan: Louis van Belle
Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 PDC + XP + roaming profile =
big, strange mistery of sorts
Louis van Belle wrote:
Hi,
This seems familuar to me..
Now, here comes the real problem
Please bear with me as this is quite a complicated problem which has
eluded me for days now...
I recently upgraded a Samba 2.2 PDC to Samba 3.0 [3.0.20a as of now].
After upgrading, I had problems with two XP machines, among 16 of them.
One of them didn't validate the domain users correctly
Hello!
I have one directiry, that contains about 4000 some other directory.
When we update our system to kernel 2.6.11 and samba 3.0.20, listing
this directory take more time and smbd process use 40-70% CPU. What
can we do to reduce CPU load? Previos system: kernel 24.29 and samba
2.0, cpu load
Ilya Sapunov schrieb:
Hello!
I have one directiry, that contains about 4000 some other directory.
When we update our system to kernel 2.6.11 and samba 3.0.20, listing
this directory take more time and smbd process use 40-70% CPU. What
can we do to reduce CPU load? Previos system: kernel 24.29
Hi
Upgrade to 3.0.20
Known issue after Rollup and was fixed
Good Luck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Markus Feilner
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 5:00 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] samba 3.0.x and windows 2000 service
Hello list,
can anybody help me:
are there any problems with active directory support between samba 3.0.x and
windows 2000 with service pack 4?
I had a perfect connection between samba 3.0.9 and windows 2000 SP3 until
today. On Friday the Administrator installed SP4 and today my linux box
yitzhak bar geva wrote:
I run a Samba PDC under Linux with Windows 2003 domain
member connected as a client with Terminal Services.
The message I get at login when trying to open a
remote Windows Terminal sesion is:
The local policy of this system does not permit you
to logon interactively.
Of John H Terpstra
-| Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:19 AM
-| To: samba@lists.samba.org
-| Subject: Re: [Samba] Joining a samba 3.0 domain with win2003 Server
-|
-| On Monday 22 August 2005 17:56, yitzhak bar geva wrote:
-| I run a Samba PDC under Linux with Windows 2003 domain
-| member
I run a Samba PDC under Linux with Windows 2003 domain
member connected as a client with Terminal Services.
The message I get at login when trying to open a
remote Windows Terminal sesion is:
The local policy of this system does not permit you
to logon interactively.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Yitzhak
On Monday 22 August 2005 17:56, yitzhak bar geva wrote:
I run a Samba PDC under Linux with Windows 2003 domain
member connected as a client with Terminal Services.
The message I get at login when trying to open a
remote Windows Terminal sesion is:
The local policy of this system does not
Has anyone had success getting OpenLDAP 2.1.22 to work with Samba
and ADS.
I can get 2.1.22 to work with Samba 3.0.x. If I try a newer version,
it barfs when it calls ldap_set_option in function ads_do_search.
I've tried with 3.0.14a and 3.0.20pre2.
They changed how OpenLDAP interacts
I need to re-compile samba to join a Windows Active Directory domain. This is
on AIX 5.2 server.
here are the steps I am following
- Install Openssl
- Install OpenLDAP
- Install MIT Kerberos
- re-compile samba
After all this, is editing the /etc/krbd5.conf and smb.conf enough or do I
need
quote who=Jeremy Anderson
Yeah, SMB is so blame chatty, and so impatient, that it just cacks
on a hub. I'd never have believed it before, but when they can
get a 24-port 10/100 DLink switch for $91 from newegg (shipped!), why
mess around with technician time? At typical consultant bill
Jeremy Anderson wrote:
Hello all!
I've got a Fedora Core 3 box running Samba 3.0.8.
It serves a variety of roles, including mail server and samba server.
The mail server is quite fast, but the smb server generates lots
and lots of TCP retransmissions (as seen in ethereal). The general
consensus
On Thursday 19 May 2005 20:53, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
I'd like to thank everyone for the help with this problem. Replacing
the two Ethernet hubs with a single Ethernet switch seems to have
resolved the problem. The two hubs were actually hot to the touch
when I looked at them. I wouldn't
- Original Message -
From: John H Terpstra
On Thursday 19 May 2005 20:53, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
I'd like to thank everyone for the help with this problem. Replacing
the two Ethernet hubs with a single Ethernet switch seems to have
resolved the problem. The two hubs were actually hot to
Eric Wood wrote:
I have followed this thread and believe I'm suffering from the same
problem. File copying is terribly slow on one of my customers networks.
The 8-port hub (which is plugged into a larger network switch) is a
no-name piece of junk. However is worked fine when only network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Earnshaw wrote
:
| Browse to the PDC's shares, find the advertised
| Cups printer and double click on it. Windows goes
| wild and says it doesn't have any driver. It
| searches around for a while and comes up with
| a useless list, but it also
Base: Red Hat RHAS3, PDC security = user
Samba 3.0.14a
Cups 1.1.17
Windows XP Pro
Epson C42UX (cheap inkjet) USB to the server
I was looking for an alternative to the immensely complicated Add
Printer Wizard procedure (APW) detailed in chapter 19.6 of the Samba
HOWTO guide. The following is a
On Monday 16 May 2005 04:42 pm, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
I wouldn't mind knowing why my [print$] share doesn't show up, though.
Apologies if I misunderstand but...a trailing $ makes a share hidden, it's
SMSOP (Standard Microsoft Operating Procedure).The default admin shares C$,
etc. are examples
On Thursday 12 May 2005 17:00, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
Thanks for the quick response, Paul!
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:38:47AM -0500, Paul Gienger wrote:
Hubs? HUBS? I hope you meant switches. If not, go buy some switches.
10/100 hubs. This is a small client, with limited hardware
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:29:54PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
Check this theory by verifying that all clients are half duplex.
When clients are set to be half-duplex, it makes no difference.
At this point, its either the wiring in the wall, or the hubs.
The customer has decided that it is
I've tried replacing the NIC, but the problem follows. This is a small network, with two 100mbit hubs, and windows 2000 on all the clients.
Hubs? HUBS? I hope you meant switches. If not, go buy some switches.
I want to suspect hardware, but flood pings from a linux box put on the network
I've tried replacing the NIC, but the problem follows. This is a small network, with two 100mbit hubs, and windows 2000 on all the clients.
Hubs? HUBS? I hope you meant switches. If not, go buy some switches.
I want to suspect hardware, but flood pings from a linux box put on the network
Thanks for the quick response, Paul!
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:38:47AM -0500, Paul Gienger wrote:
Hubs? HUBS? I hope you meant switches. If not, go buy some switches.
10/100 hubs. This is a small client, with limited hardware budget.
So, it's a pair of 8-port 10/100 hubs, connected.
I
Can samba 3.0.x tool net do ldap search with trusted domain controller by
current domain user ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hubs? HUBS? I hope you meant switches. If not, go buy some switches.
10/100 hubs. This is a small client, with limited hardware budget.
So, it's a pair of 8-port 10/100 hubs, connected.
I cannot find any differences between the fast machine and the slow machines--except the fast machine has
quote who=Jeremy Anderson
Hello all!
I've got a Fedora Core 3 box running Samba 3.0.8.
It serves a variety of roles, including mail server and samba server.
The mail server is quite fast, but the smb server generates lots and lots
of TCP retransmissions (as seen in ethereal). The general
Hello all!
I've got a Fedora Core 3 box running Samba 3.0.8.
It serves a variety of roles, including mail server and samba server.
The mail server is quite fast, but the smb server generates lots and lots of
TCP retransmissions (as seen in ethereal). The general consensus is that this
is new
Does anyone have a good howto for installing and configuring Samba 3.0 on
AIX 5.2? The IBM Redbook is for v2.0 of Samba. Perhaps someone can share
their success, please?
Thanks
Andy Speagle
Always remember that you are unique. Just like everybody else.
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Hi All,
Has anyone been able to setup samba on a Linux server using domain
authentication? I am getting this error while joining the domain:
[2005/04/28 17:39:25, 0] libads/kerberos.c:ads_kinit_password(146)
kerberos_kinit_password [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed: Cannot find KDC
for requested realm
Hi,
I´m new on samba and I´m trying to use samba functions (no daemons).
The case is I can´t execute any of the programs that is on
samba-3.0.11/testsuite/libsmbclient/src/
to prove that library. Does anybody know how to run it?
Thanks in advance..
--
Hi,
I am runnnin samba server in a linux machine. I have enabled smb signing
to server signing = Auto in smb.conf file.
I connect to linux machine access the shares through Win XP (SP2). In
WinXp smb signing is also enabled.
Now the connection opens up fine and I am able to browse the folders.
Hafiz Abdul Rehman wrote:
Hello,
i have installed Sun Java Enterprise Directory 5.2
configured it for messaging and posix accounts
i can logon to solaris no problem
i complied samba with --with-ldapsam
i configured the smb.conf testparam check and report Ok
when i start samba no errors in
1 - 100 of 972 matches
Mail list logo
