On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:52 +0100, Alexander Födisch wrote:
When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective
read-only:
~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx
# file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx
# owner: root
# group: 11816
user::rwx
When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective
read-only:
~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx
# file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx
# owner: root
# group: 11816
user::rwx
user:11582:rwx#effective:r--
group::rwx
2010/4/3 grant little wrote:
Upgrade to 3.5.1 (or 2 real soon)...
I tried sernet lenny 3.4 packages and no ACL bug.
So it's something related to lenny-backports packages.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Quartexx wrote:
After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny
After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny
with a backport of 2:3.4.5~dfsg-1 (with libtalloc2 2.0.1-1), i get a
fully working service but with a strange ACL bug : people can
create/delete/rename files, but not modify them (error espace
insuffisant pour traiter cette
Hello,
After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny
with a backport of 2:3.4.5~dfsg-1 (with libtalloc2 2.0.1-1), i get a
fully working service but with a strange ACL bug : people can
create/delete/rename files, but not modify them (error espace
insuffisant pour
On Fri, March 13, 2009 11:07, Christos Karaviotis wrote:
On Wed, March 11, 2009 14:26, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
working and everyone have full access
On Wed, March 11, 2009 14:26, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
working and everyone have full access everywhere even if they are not in
the acl.
If I try to
Hi list,
This is my first post and I hope I will not make people mad as this may
have been answered before.
Here it goes.
I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
working and everyone have full
I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
working and everyone have full access everywhere even if they are not in
the acl.
If I try to add them and restrict them only to read and execute the
Is that the only option? We've noticed the same behavior of osx clients
recently, but we also have linux clients connecting and I don't wish to
degrade the experience by disabling unix extensions.
What is effect of disabling unix extensions? At least with it acls work
on OSX too.
--
Eero
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:19:19 James Peach wrote:
2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
says access denied to every directory that is using acl.
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
says access denied to every directory that is using acl.
Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl or is this OSX
bug? Is there any solution on OSX that
2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard says
access denied to every directory that is using acl.
Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl or is
Hi all,
I habe a strange Problem with Samba 3.0.20-SUSE-SERNET (ad memberserver).
Everytime I try to access a file/directory with user-acls via a XP box I get
access denied! The group-acls works. On W2K and NT4 Clients there is no problem
like this.
client output
Hi all,
I have joined samba server (3.0.14a-2) to an ADS. I can copy, move and
remove files from any windows workstation and also I can set ACLs. I
need migrate files from 4 w2k servers to samba server and preserve
ACL's. One server are into ADS domain, but the others server are into
others
Hello
I have samba (2.2.7a) shares on linux (rh 7 9) servers with posix-acl
(both kernel (2.4.19/ext2 and 2.4.20/xfs) and samba enabled) and an nt 4 PDC.
works fine except that I can't change acl of a file/dir if i'm not the
owner, thought i'm in a group that has write access to the file/dir
I
Trying to add users using security tab i WinXP doesn't work for us, no
users are added. Existing ACLs are possible to change and delete.
This behavior has been identified with both Solaris 2.6, Linux 2.4.9-31
with XFS, Samba 2.2.5 and 2.2.8. I'm attaching global part of out
smb.conf and a
Hi,
I am running Redhat linux 8.0.
rpm -qa | grep acl gives the following result
libacl-2.0.11-2
acl-2.0.11-2
libacl-devel-2.0.11-2
How can I know whether I got acl support install on my NT machine? Do I need to
specify acl support in the smb.conf file?
I got problem giving permission to
;icr.a-star.edu.sg]
Sent: 15 November 2002 09:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] ACL problem
Hi,
I am running Redhat linux 8.0.
rpm -qa | grep acl gives the following result
libacl-2.0.11-2
acl-2.0.11-2
libacl-devel-2.0.11-2
How can I know whether I got acl support install on my NT machine
19 matches
Mail list logo
