On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba
which got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:52:46PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks this helps.
Let me know if you really need the first version with ACL
support and I'll track it down.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
support.
Can you please confirm on this?.
Thanks
Suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
support.
Can you please confirm on this?.
Oh yes, we've had
Thanks this helps.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; j...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl
My agency is migrating from Solaris PCnetlink to Samba 3.0.20b for file
and print sharing. Samba is installed on Solaris 9 (which I just recently
inherited). Is there any way to tell if Samba was compiled with ACL
support? I am having some trouble matching permissions from windows to
Unix.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My agency is migrating from Solaris PCnetlink to Samba 3.0.20b for file
and print sharing. Samba is installed on Solaris 9 (which I just recently
inherited). Is there any way to tell if Samba was compiled with ACL
support? I am having some trouble matching permissions
Gerald (Jerry) Carter:
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
| I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file.
|
|
| This should be --with-acl according to my RH spec.
That's wrong.
$ ./configure --help | grep acl
~ --with-acl-support Include ACL support (default=no)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
| I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file.
|
|
| This should be --with-acl according to my RH spec.
That's wrong.
$ ./configure --help | grep acl
~ --with-acl-support Include ACL support
Meli Marco:
I have download the latest version samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, and I have make
followings changes: Rpm -i samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, so I have created the
SPEC file.
I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file.
This should be --with-acl according to my RH
Hi,
I have download the latest version samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, and I have make
followings changes:
Rpm -i samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, so I have created the SPEC file.
I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file.
Rpmbuild -bb specfile.spec.
It compile the finally rpm without
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 08:00, Meli Marco wrote:
Hi,
I have download the latest version samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, and I have make
followings changes:
Rpm -i samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, so I have created the SPEC file.
I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file.
Dear All,
I am running samba 2.2.7-5 on a RH 8.0 box with 2.4.20-18 kernel and
I am trying to migrate a Win2K Server to Samba.
The samba RPM has --with-acl-support activated.
I manually add all the net users into the samba box using the command
useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null -m username
*
My apologies for the incomplete info !!!
I repeat the e-mail so you do not get confused.
*
Dear All,
I am running samba 2.2.7-5 on a RH 8.0 box with 2.4.20-18 kernel
Do you have ACL support enabled in the filesystem?
You may want to see http://acl.bestbits.at/
-Tom
*
My apologies for the incomplete info !!!
I repeat the e-mail so you do not get confused.
Hello, I have gone through all the relevant document and FAQ and
searched your website on this issue, and haven't found a thing, so I
believe this could be a bug. Supposedly as of Samba 2.2.7, Access
Control Lists are supported from Solaris 2.6+. I am running Solaris 2.8
and Samba 2.2.8, however,
I've noticed that on Samba 2.2.5, that the ACLs don't work quite as
expected. Under win2000 you remove access by the group everyone by deleting
it, under Samba, you have to set the group Everyone to deny all (which then
gives you a warning, and then you can add separate users.)
Is it possible to
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 22:00, Jay Ts wrote:
cksoo wrote:
Now, I try to implement the ACL with similar to the ACL in windos 2000
server. However, I failed to implement it until file level, can someone
guide me to implement me.
1. You need to run Samba on a Unix system with a
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:brad;langhorst.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Christopher Barry
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] ACL support in Samba
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 10:00, Christopher Barry wrote:
What (in hopefully
cksoo wrote:
Now, I try to implement the ACL with similar to the ACL in windos 2000
server. However, I failed to implement it until file level, can someone
guide me to implement me.
1. You need to run Samba on a Unix system with a filesystem that
supports ACLs.
2. When compiling Samba, use
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work? I've
compiled the packages, then installed them from the RPM but I had no
luck at all. I compiled a kernel with ACL support but when I try to set
a new permission it says permission not supported or something like
that. I
Jean-Rene Cormier wrote:
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work? I've
compiled the packages, then installed them from the RPM but I had no
luck at all. I compiled a kernel with ACL support but when I try to set
a new permission it says permission not supported or
Title: RE: [Samba] ACL support
A few things you may try.
First, make sure your ACL utilities and samba are compiled against the equivalent version of the libaries; make sure your versions line up as best as possible. Second, make sure you've mounted the filesystem with the acl option set
That must be it, I didn't see that mentioned anywhere.
Thanks a lot
Jean-Rene Cormier
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] De
la part de Yura Pismerov
Envoyé : 1 octobre, 2002 10:32
À : Jean-Rene Cormier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Samba] ACL
be useful.
Scott F. Crosby
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Rene Cormier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Samba List
Subject: [Samba] ACL support
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work? I've
compiled the packages
la part de Yura Pismerov
Envoyé : 1 octobre, 2002 10:32
À : Jean-Rene Cormier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Samba] ACL support
Jean-Rene Cormier wrote:
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work?
I've
compiled the packages, then installed them from the RPM
PROTECTED]] De
la part de Yura Pismerov
EnvoyИ : 1 octobre, 2002 10:32
ю : Jean-Rene Cormier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Samba] ACL support
Jean-Rene Cormier wrote:
Anybody got the latest version of ACL from acl.bestbit.at to work?
I've
compiled the packages, then installed them from
Helo.
I'm running here samba 2.2.4 on redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.17 patched with
ACL patches from http://acl.bestbits.at and appropreiate utils.
Samba is member of a NT 4 domain.
I configured (./configure --with-privatedir=/etc/samba
--with-lockdir=/var/lock --with-configdir=/etc/samba
Helo.
I'm running here samba 2.2.4 on redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.17 patched with
ACL patches from http://acl.bestbits.at and appropreiate utils.
Samba is member of a NT 4 domain.
I configured (./configure --with-privatedir=/etc/samba
--with-lockdir=/var/lock --with-configdir=/etc/samba
29 matches
Mail list logo
