Re: [Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5

2010-02-21 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:53:00PM +0100, christoph.be...@desy.de wrote: Hi there, I almot exlusively use samba for printing in a semi large scale (2.000 windows hosts 500 printers). I have been running 3.0.20 for a long time and was quite happy with it. Unfortunately my windows fellows

Re: [Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5

2010-02-21 Thread Christoph Beyer
Hi Jeremy, thanks for the advice will keep that in mind for the near future :) Do you have any ideas about my other problem (slow printing with AD 2008 R2 - 3.3.10) is 3.5.0rc3 also a 'maybe' solution for that ? cheers christoph On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, Feb

[Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5

2010-02-20 Thread christoph . beyer
Hi there, I almot exlusively use samba for printing in a semi large scale (2.000 windows hosts 500 printers). I have been running 3.0.20 for a long time and was quite happy with it. Unfortunately my windows fellows have now updated to AD 2008 R2 and I experienced some immediate problems

[Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5 (fwd)

2010-02-18 Thread christoph . beyer
Hi there, I almot exlusively use samba for printing in a semi large scale (2.000 windows hosts 500 printers). I have been running 3.0.20 for a long time and was quite happy with it. Unfortunately my windows fellows have now updated to AD 2008 R2 and I experienced some immediate problems

Re: [Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5 (fwd)

2010-02-18 Thread Jack Downes
Similar situation here, 484 printers at current count, 2120 users (hospital), and we've been pretty happy with the Samba/CUPS solution. However, recently, too many issues with Samba an printing (3.4.5, debian), so we've gotten rid of it, still use it for file shares and such. Anyway, we are a

Re: [Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5 (fwd)

2010-02-18 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:02:22PM -0700, Jack Downes wrote: Similar situation here, 484 printers at current count, 2120 users (hospital), and we've been pretty happy with the Samba/CUPS solution. However, recently, too many issues with Samba an printing (3.4.5, debian), so we've gotten rid

Re: [Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5 (fwd)

2010-02-18 Thread Robert Freeman-Day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:02:22PM -0700, Jack Downes wrote: Similar situation here, 484 printers at current count, 2120 users (hospital), and we've been pretty happy with the Samba/CUPS solution. However, recently, too

Re: [Samba] AD 2008 R2 vs. samba 3.4.5

2010-02-18 Thread christoph . beyer
Hi Robert, OK at least I am not all alone ;) To be honest I avoided cups so far and used lprng with good results. Have to use cups now though for my linux clients they just need the cups libraries for all kind of stuff. Did you find any way to avoid massive drop down lists on client