Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-10 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 09.06.2011 21:46, schrieb Charles Marcus: On 2011-06-09 2:00 PM, Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote: Am 09.06.2011 15:46, schrieb Charles Marcus: It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters.

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-10 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/10/2011 03:48 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 09.06.2011 21:46, schrieb Charles Marcus: On 2011-06-09 2:00 PM, Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote: Am 09.06.2011 15:46, schrieb Charles Marcus: It would be nice if one of the list

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-10 Thread Doug Lytle
Ryan Novosielski wrote: It's not clear to me... are ALL autoresponders braindead or are there some that don't notice it's a mailing list contacting them? Some auto-responders look at the to: field and if it's not directly sent to the recipient's address (i.e. samba@lists.samba.org) then it

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-10 Thread David Magda
On Thu, June 9, 2011 09:46, Charles Marcus wrote: It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters. This should be official list policy for ALL email lists... Except some people don't have a choice in what

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-10 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/10/2011 05:07 PM, David Magda wrote: Except some people don't have a choice in what mail server they can use. They're punished because someone in their IT department made a decision which they had no input in? Assuming that their IT

[Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-09 Thread Charles Marcus
It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters. This should be official list policy for ALL email lists... On 2011-06-08 2:00 PM, samba-requ...@lists.samba.org wrote: Subject: Re: [Samba] samba Digest, Vol

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-09 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 09.06.2011 15:46, schrieb Charles Marcus: It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters. This should be official list policy for ALL email lists... just like do not top post *g ? On 2011-06-08 2:00

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-09 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
I am not sure how much control some e-mail apps/servers give you over auto-replies- Exchange 2007/Outlook 2007 lets you set a separate reply for internal vs external senders, and lets you restrict external responses to only senders in your address book. You can of course create a custom

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-09 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2011-06-09 2:00 PM, Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org wrote: Am 09.06.2011 15:46, schrieb Charles Marcus: It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters. This should be official list policy for ALL

Re: [Samba] Braindead Autoreply filters... WAS Re: samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 8

2011-06-09 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Charles, Du meintest am 09.06.11: This should be official list policy for ALL email lists... just like do not top post *g ? Don't be stupid Robert... there are times when top-posting is perfectly acceptable, and that was one of them (ie, when the content of the quote is