Hi,
Is it possible for me to add @Some_Group as a memberUID for a Samba group
mapping? Will it expand that @Some_Group to include all the members of that
group in this group?
Another question -- is there a way to make everyone able to add printers to
their local workstation, but not be able
Friday, November 21, 2003, 5:44:54 AM, Robert wrote:
I think I understand. So, if I want a user (in LDAP) to be a part of
your ntadmins group, I'd set his gidNumber to 1000, correct? Would I
also need to add a memberUid field in the ntadmins group for this user?
IE for user bob:
dn:
Robert Rati wrote:
I think I understand. So, if I want a user (in LDAP) to be a part of
your ntadmins group, I'd set his gidNumber to 1000, correct? Would I
also need to add a memberUid field in the ntadmins group for this
user? IE for user bob:
You could set the users gidNumber to 1000,
I'm a little weak on how the groups assignments work with Samba and
LDAP. The Samba HOWTO collection says to map each Domain Group to a
UNIX system group, but if all authentication is done via LDAP (Unix and
Windows) then do the groups still have to exist on the Samba Unix
machine? Where do
Rob,
Maybe I can shed some light on this for you. I have just setup a Samba
PDC + LDAP machine here. For the group assignments to work you will
still need to have a unix group on the machine. So you use the normal
method to add a unix group in the ldap directory. You can then add any
I think I understand. So, if I want a user (in LDAP) to be a part of
your ntadmins group, I'd set his gidNumber to 1000, correct? Would I
also need to add a memberUid field in the ntadmins group for this user?
IE for user bob:
dn: cn=ntadmins,ou=Groups,dc=firerun,dc=net
cn: ntadmins
