Re: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread Les Bell
Les Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First: I created an Administrator account in Linux, and it wound up (here) with a UID/GID of 604. That's just an ordinary user ID, so what makes it special as far as the domain is concerned? Should the Administrator account have a UID/GID of 0? If I try to run

RE: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread John H Terpstra
Terpstra Samba-Team email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original Message Subject: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated? From: Les Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, May 19, 2004 9:34 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a couple of Samba 2.2 servers, in different locations, configured

RE: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread Umberto Zanatta
for the root account is 500. - John T. --- John H Terpstra Samba-Team email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original Message Subject: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated? From: Les Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, May 19, 2004 9:34 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a couple

RE: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread Les Bell
Andreas S. Haramasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: edit /etc/passwd and change UID 604 to 1 for Administrator (Windows uses 0 for super user on Unix it is 1). Uh-uh: now that I *am* sure about - root on Unix is 0, while on Windows the domain Administrator is SID -500 (and the Domain Administrators

[Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-19 Thread Les Bell
I have a couple of Samba 2.2 servers, in different locations, configured as NT Domain Controllers, but I'm experiencing some problems with logging on to the domains as Administrator in order to perform some administration tasks, such as configuring antivirus software on workstations. I won't go