Re: [Samba] Im just curious

2013-05-19 Thread Matthieu Patou
On 05/18/2013 05:26 AM, Sandbox wrote: 2013-05-17 00:43 keltezéssel, Marc Muehlfeld írta: Hello, Am 16.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Sandbox: Is it possible (well, look like it works) to include a preconfigured bind zone to samba named.conf, so I don't get that annoying zone conflict error message

Re: [Samba] Im just curious

2013-05-19 Thread wong lmark
Just in case, how can check that if used the Samba_Internal? 2013/5/19 Matthieu Patou m...@samba.org On 05/18/2013 05:26 AM, Sandbox wrote: 2013-05-17 00:43 keltezéssel, Marc Muehlfeld írta: Hello, Am 16.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Sandbox: Is it possible (well, look like it works) to

Re: [Samba] Im just curious

2013-05-18 Thread Sandbox
2013-05-17 00:43 keltezéssel, Marc Muehlfeld írta: Hello, Am 16.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Sandbox: Is it possible (well, look like it works) to include a preconfigured bind zone to samba named.conf, so I don't get that annoying zone conflict error message while I start bind? Actualy, the

[Samba] Im just curious

2013-05-16 Thread Sandbox
Hi, Is it possible (well, look like it works) to include a preconfigured bind zone to samba named.conf, so I don't get that annoying zone conflict error message while I start bind? Actualy, the important question is, this kind of configuration could interfere with samba4 if the server is

Re: [Samba] Im just curious

2013-05-16 Thread Marc Muehlfeld
Hello, Am 16.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Sandbox: Is it possible (well, look like it works) to include a preconfigured bind zone to samba named.conf, so I don't get that annoying zone conflict error message while I start bind? Actualy, the important question is, this kind of configuration could