Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-30 Thread Matt Nelson
Dave because it is actually easier to setup. You are also not adding another protocol to worry about. Don Werder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy From: Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matt Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 29 Oct 2002 11

Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-30 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 17:38, Matt Nelson wrote: I did that, still no luck. Files just dissappear. If I run netatalk, can the pc clients still work with the files as well? I don't understand why a direct copy fails, and a copy VIA a windows workstation works. That makes *no* sense. if

Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-29 Thread Matt Nelson
I was planning to use (and that is what is installed now), DAVE by Thursby inc. That allows SMB usage on a Mac. Its the file corruption that is occurring on a mac to samba copy, that doesn't occur on a mac to samba VIA windows 2k wkstn that has me stumped. Any ideas folks? *pleading* --

Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-29 Thread Mark Ferlatte
begin Matt Nelson quote on Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:41:26AM -0600: I was planning to use (and that is what is installed now), DAVE by Thursby inc. That allows SMB usage on a Mac. Its the file corruption that is occurring on a mac to samba copy, that doesn't occur on a mac to samba VIA

Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-29 Thread Donald Werder
prefer Dave because it is actually easier to setup. You are also not adding another protocol to worry about. Don Werder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy From: Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matt Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 29 Oct

Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-28 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:13:17PM -0600, Matt Nelson wrote: Since I posted this over the weekend, I thought I'd throw it out one more time to see if anyone else might see it and has any ideas on this. I didn't know samba could serve macs. Does the mac speak SMB? (Long time since I used macs)

[Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-26 Thread Matt Nelson
I've built a new samba server to replace an aging Apple 9500 running 8.6 that is acting as a 'file server'. The other macs run 9.2 and 10.2, which are the computers that will be served (I HOPE!) by the samba server. I have installed DAVE in order to be able to copy the files over to the new

Re: [Samba] Older Mac to SAMBA copy

2002-10-26 Thread Matt Nelson
At 08:00 AM 10/26/2002 -0500, you wrote: I've built a new samba server to replace an aging Apple 9500 running 8.6 that is acting as a 'file server'. The other macs run 9.2 and 10.2, which are the computers that will be served (I HOPE!) by the samba server. I have installed DAVE in order to be