On 20/02/13 03:24, Gregory Sloop wrote:
DS On 02/17/2013 6:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
-SNIP-
Therefore, it was suggested on a private list that we just drop SWAT. I
Am 18.02.2013 01:02, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
At the same time, while I know many of our users use SWAT, we just don't
have anybody to maintain it inside the Samba Team.
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:29 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 20/02/13 03:24, Gregory Sloop wrote:
DS On 02/17/2013 6:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
-SNIP-
On 20/02/13 10:57, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:29 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 20/02/13 03:24, Gregory Sloop wrote:
DS On 02/17/2013 6:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the
-SNIP-
However, for anyone looking for a web version of the smb.conf for
4.0.3 - see this wiki page.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Documentation_Links/samba4-smb.conf
SA Just curious what is the source of the smb.conf manual above.
I think your question was answered in terms of S4 vs S3
On 02/17/2013 6:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
At the same time, while I know many of our users use SWAT, we just don't
have anybody to maintain it inside the Samba Team. Kai
DS On 02/17/2013 6:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
-SNIP-
Therefore, it was suggested on a private list that we just drop SWAT. I
want to start a public discussion on
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
At the same time, while I know many of our users use SWAT, we just don't
have anybody to maintain it inside the Samba Team. Kai has made a
valiant effort to at least apply the
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
Has webmin kept up to date with the latest structural changes in
smb.conf? I'll admit that I've
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 20:52 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
As most of you would have noticed, we have now had 3 CVE-nominated
security issues for SWAT in the past couple of years.
Has webmin kept up to date with
I'm just a data point of one. My Samba history
is as a user since before 2.0.
Shortly into the 2.0.x series I was asked by
locals (a point and click lot) to setup Swat so
they could manage Samba. I did so and they
still f'ed the configuration.
That was and remains my only experience with
This is why it is smart to use a dedicated Firefox profile for banking,
another profile just for email, another profile for web browsing.And of
course, another dedicated profile for internal systems only such as
for managing dd-wrt, switches, iLO, DRAC, webcams, webmin and swat.
Safer is to
12 matches
Mail list logo
