Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-11-03 Thread Glen Gibb
Anyone have a sample line from inetd.conf that gets smbd to start on port 445 when smbd is already running on 139 from the samba startup script? I haven't had any luck yet? The following works for me: (sorry abt the line break) microsoft-dsstream tcp nowait root

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-11-03 Thread Joel Hammer
Just make sure that the /etc/services file has microsoft-ds defined in it. Mine doesn't. Joel On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:51:54AM +1100, Glen Gibb wrote: Anyone have a sample line from inetd.conf that gets smbd to start on port 445 when smbd is already running on 139 from the samba startup

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-31 Thread Jason Joines
Andrew Bartlett wrote: Joel Hammer wrote: I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other daemons as needed, I THINK. Joel You can only have one smbd running as a daemon. You can start others via inetd however. The issue of 139/445 has been addressed in 3.0

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-07 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Jason Joines wrote: I have been running an smbd daemon on port 445 with the -p option but have never been able to start a second daemon. No, you can only have one deamon, but you can run another via inetd. -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager,

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-07 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Joel Hammer wrote: I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other daemons as needed, I THINK. Joel You can only have one smbd running as a daemon. You can start others via inetd however. The issue of 139/445 has been addressed in 3.0 by listining on both ports

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-04 Thread Jason Joines
Joel Hammer wrote: Just making all this stuff up off the top of my head. I have never done this, but you could try: Running two smbd daemon, each listening to different ports. Redirecting traffic from port 445 to 139 with some firewall rules. I redirect traffic with ipmasqadm, but there are

[Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-03 Thread Jason Joines
I've noticed that my W2K clients connect to Samba much more quickly if I run it on port 445 instead of 139. However, my WNT clients then won't connect at all. I read somewhere that it was possible to forward the requests on port 139 to port 445. Anyone know how to do this or how to

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-03 Thread Joel Hammer
Just making all this stuff up off the top of my head. I have never done this, but you could try: Running two smbd daemon, each listening to different ports. Redirecting traffic from port 445 to 139 with some firewall rules. I redirect traffic with ipmasqadm, but there are surely others. Running

Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-03 Thread Joel Hammer
man smb.conf / -p Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-03 Thread Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:47 PM To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445 I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other daemons as needed, I THINK. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:41:39PM -0500

RE: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445

2002-10-03 Thread Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:47 PM To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445 I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other daemons as needed, I THINK. Joel On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:41:39PM -0500