Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:58:44PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we
change security=share to have the following semantics:
- All connections are made as the guest user
- No passwords are required, and
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:53 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:34 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:00:00AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
to support your proposal, could you start documentation on
wiki.samba.org (if it's not already there) how to
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:45 -0500, simo wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Am I correct in thinking this would make all shares have the same
password as the guest user, or do
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 07:30 -0500, Mike Rambo wrote:
From what I saw in the rest of the thread it looks like there will
still be a way to do this but I thought I'd chime in since the subject
has come up and we do use security=share to accomplish this at present.
There will always be a way
Andrew,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:53:47AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 07:30 -0500, Mike Rambo wrote:
From what I saw in the rest of the thread it looks like there will
still be a way to do this but I thought I'd chime in since the subject
has come up and we do
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:00:00AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Andrew,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:53:47AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 07:30 -0500, Mike Rambo wrote:
From what I saw in the rest of the thread it looks like there will
still be a way to do
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:34 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:00:00AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Andrew,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:53:47AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 07:30 -0500, Mike Rambo wrote:
From what I saw in the rest of
I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we
change security=share to have the following semantics:
- All connections are made as the guest user
- No passwords are required, and no other accounts are available.
Naturally, full user-name/password authentication remain
On 02/27/2012 04:58 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we
change security=share to have the following semantics:
- All connections are made as the guest user
- No passwords are required, and no other accounts are available.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:58:44PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we
change security=share to have the following semantics:
- All connections are made as the guest user
- No passwords are required, and no other accounts are
Am 27.02.2012 13:39, schrieb John H Terpstra:
On 02/27/2012 04:58 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we
change security=share to have the following semantics:
- All connections are made as the guest user
- No passwords are required,
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 06:39 -0600, John H Terpstra wrote:
On 02/27/2012 04:58 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we
change security=share to have the following semantics:
- All connections are made as the guest user
- No
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Am I correct in thinking this would make all shares have the same
password as the guest user, or do you mean there really is no password
at all, or alternatively that one would specify the share, provide
it's password and be logged
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Am I correct in thinking this would make all shares have the same
password as the guest user, or do you mean there really is no password
at all, or alternatively that
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:45 -0500, simo wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Am I correct in thinking this would make all shares have the same
password as the guest user, or do you mean there
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 12:19 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:45 -0500, simo wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Am I correct in thinking this would make all shares have
16 matches
Mail list logo
