Regarding your latest samba.spec for version 4.0.4-0.1
If "with_dc" is activated, the build still fails with:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/samba/ldb/ildap.so
As I reported before, there is an entry for "ldbsamba_extensions.so"
under "# ldb libra
I'll update as soon as I find cycles...
Nico Kadel-Garcia
Email: nka...@gmail.com
Sent from iPhone
On Mar 20, 2013, at 15:37, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> built
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
I forgot something.
%{_libdir}/samba/libdfs_server_ad.so
%{_libdir}/samba/libposix_eadb.so
As I said before, those two entries MUST be within "### LIBS", under
"%if %with_dc". Otherwise, the build completes cleanly but the install
process of "samba-libs" and "samba" fails with the following:
I tested the .spec file you posted today. There's still a glitch remaining.
If built with the file as it is ("%global with_dc 0") the packages build
cleanly.
However, if "%global with_dc 1" is used, the build fails with the
following error:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged)
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Diego Remolina
wrote:
> I think a lot of your work was probably prior to RHEL 6.4, but have you
> tried looking at their new SRPM for samba 4.0.0 and adapting it to 4.0.3?
Unfortunately somewhere between 4.0.0 and 4.0.3. they introduced now
related package depend
I've been spending some time backporting Samba 4.0.3 from Fedora 19 to
RHEL 6, partly as proof of concept, partly to make it available to
others. I've published my work at:
https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/
The key RPM building tools are at:
https://github.com
