Hi
2008/6/7 Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This message denied by security descriptor is 100% that
something is in your share_info.tdb. If deleting that did
not help, I'm lost.
Would that be the share_info.tdb on the PDC or on the machine sharing
that drive?
Jean-Yves
--
To unsubscribe
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:19:08PM +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
2008/6/7 Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This message denied by security descriptor is 100% that
something is in your share_info.tdb. If deleting that did
not help, I'm lost.
Would that be the share_info.tdb on the PDC
Hi again
2008/6/5 Jean-Yves Avenard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the smb log file, I would see
make_connection: connection to public denied due to security descriptor.
A thread bump...
No one has ever faced this issue? any solutions by any chance?
Thanks
JY
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:48:44AM +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
2008/6/5 Jean-Yves Avenard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the smb log file, I would see
make_connection: connection to public denied due to security descriptor.
A thread bump...
No one has ever faced this issue? any solutions by
Hi
Thanks for your help
2008/6/7 Volker Lendecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you set access controls with the Windows server manager?
no, I don't even know what that is
If not, and the settings in your smb.conf are everything you
need to control access to your shares, then you might want
to
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this patch against 3.0.x - should fix the problem.
Jeremy.
Yep, make test seems to be happy now. Thanks.
Should I still file a bug report?
-David
--
David Eisner http://cradle.brokenglass.com
--
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:23:31PM -0400, David Eisner wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this patch against 3.0.x - should fix the problem.
Jeremy.
Yep, make test seems to be happy now. Thanks.
Should I still file a bug report?
It
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I still file a bug report?
It might help so we can track it, thanks.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Thanks again for your help.
-David
--
David Eisner http://cradle.brokenglass.com
--
To
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:19 PM, David Eisner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build and install Samba 3.0.30 on a Solaris 9 SPARC machine.
When I do a make test, the RW1 test is failing. If I go back and
configure and build 3.0.28 with the same settings, and do a make test,
Hmm, I wonder if this isn't a bug with the fix for CVE-2008-1105.
I'll add a bug (to the 717 [1] NEW bugs for Samba 3.0 ...), but
here's what seems to be going on at a low level:
When the client state is setup in run_readwritetest() by way of
torture_open_connection(), cli_state-bufsize gets set
It looks like a bug in smbtorture. I ran a 3.0.26a version of
smbtorture against a 3.0.30 server and it passes.
David Eisner wrote:
Hmm, I wonder if this isn't a bug with the fix for CVE-2008-1105.
I'll add a bug (to the 717 [1] NEW bugs for Samba 3.0 ...), but
here's what seems to be going on
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:22:09PM -0400, David Eisner wrote:
Hmm, I wonder if this isn't a bug with the fix for CVE-2008-1105.
I'll add a bug (to the 717 [1] NEW bugs for Samba 3.0 ...), but
here's what seems to be going on at a low level:
When the client state is setup in
I have run a debug level 10, and removed the option PASSWORD SERVER
from the configuration file since my last email.
Also since the last post I have checked to ensure I'm using gcc 4.1.2 by
changing the profile correctly, which I'd not done in the past.
I think that removing password server got
On Sat, 31 May 2008, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Saturday 31 May 2008 14:36:44 Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Miguel Medalha wrote:
| The tarball of the daily docs build is still unavailable after
| several weeks. The link to
| http://www.samba.org/~samba-bugs/docs/samba-docs-latest.tar.bz2 is
|
My apologies...
I was reporting some spam, and typed too fast, so matched on sam (which
matched this list) instead of 'spam'...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
John, thanks for those instructions but unfortunately its not working that
easily. i followed all your steps but i'm getting a Failed to set Security on
the Destination Profile. Error - Access is denied. do you know how i can fix
this???
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 09:47:17 Leandro Tracchia wrote:
John, thanks for those instructions but unfortunately its not working that
easily. i followed all your steps but i'm getting a Failed to set Security
on the Destination Profile. Error - Access is denied. do you know how i
can fix
john, the target profile folder is writable. the error is happening when i click
on 'OK' for the Copy To dialog box.
i did, however, manage to get this to work with the moveuser.exe utility.
http://mds.mandriva.org/wiki/MdsFaq
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
that worked like a charm, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:12:53 -0800, Alberto Moreno wrote:
The only problem is this new server, i read about some changes
with samba 3.0.25b and oldest version, since we add this server to the
domain we had been having problems, we enable the roaming profile to our
windows clients, but
I've found that if I delete anything from a roaming profile on the client-side,
I need to delete the server-side
copy entirely, then log out to save a new roaming profile.
On Tue, 27 May 2008 18:29:34 + (UTC), Avery Payne wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:12:53 -0800, Alberto Moreno wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 17:40:41 -0500, John H Terpstra wrote:
Instead of posting an unreadable smb.conf file, please be kind to the
people who want to help you. You could send the output of: testparm -s
Testparm will output only those parameters that are set at non-default
value and presents
Michael Heydon wrote:
From the smb.conf man page:
printer admin (S)
Correct. I cover printing via CUPS / Samba from Windows clients in my
presentation:
Samba 3 PDC for Windows Clients and Samba 3 Book Review
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/pub/presentations/iccm2007.pdf
PDF page 21
Oh, one other note... You will have to log on to the domain as a userid with
Printer Admin permissions.
For some reason after re-reading the OP's question, I am not certain they are
doing that.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Friday 23 May 2008 06:21:56 am you wrote:
pdbedit --pwd-must-change-time=2010-01-01 \
--time-format=%Y-%m-%d username
Please file a Bugzilla bug report. It appears to be broken in 3.0.29. I can
reproduce the problem. Thanks for making us aware of this.
Swat won't allow me to reset any passwords while in demo mode...
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Santiago Andres Triana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Linux Addict, it did work.
I was able to see the swat page
Here's my /etc/xinet.d/swat
service swat
{
port= 901
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
only_from = 10.1.1.1
user= root
server = /usr/sbin/swat
log_on_failure
On Thursday 22 May 2008 10:04:11 am Santiago Andres Triana wrote:
Tried again removing the only_from 10.1.1.1 line to no avail. I can't also
find the pid of any SWAT daemon to attach strace to.
var/log/messages shows SWAT started with a pid when i try to login from a
web browser but then
Tried again removing the only_from 10.1.1.1 line to no avail. I can't also
find the pid of any SWAT daemon to attach strace to.
var/log/messages shows SWAT started with a pid when i try to login from a
web browser but then strace says there is no such process! what is going on?
On Thu, May 22,
yes, /usr/sbin/swat exists
and every time I try to login from a web browswer a new line appears in
/var/log/authpriv indicating that SWAT started with a pid number. How do I
use strace to see what SWAT is doing? Issuing strace -p somepid while the
authentication dialog box is displayed does not
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Santiago Andres Triana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, /usr/sbin/swat exists
and every time I try to login from a web browswer a new line appears in
/var/log/authpriv indicating that SWAT started with a pid number. How do I
use strace to see what SWAT is
On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:33:34 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:47:52PM +, Avery Payne wrote:
Question:
We recently moved to a Samba-based file server, which holds mission-
critical data on it (.dbf files used by our Accounting software, etc.)
[big snip]
But
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Santiago Andres Triana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hosts.allow has the internal network and hosts.deny is set to ALL(ALL).
This might seem silly but I just don't know how to run swat if it is not
from /etc/xinetd.d/swat. Just issuing /usr/sbin/swat doesn't do
hosts.allow has the internal network and hosts.deny is set to ALL(ALL).
This might seem silly but I just don't know how to run swat if it is not
from /etc/xinetd.d/swat. Just issuing /usr/sbin/swat doesn't do anything
even if I remove swat from /etc/xinetd.d/ and(or) /etc/services/ . By the
same
On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:31:48 -0500, John H Terpstra wrote:
Avery,
OK - I'll respond too. I see Jeremy has beaten me to it.
Let me tell you up front, if you want the documentation to be improved
the best thing you can do is contribute changes and updates. Making us
aware of docuentation
On Thu, 22 May 2008 10:59:08 +0200, Chris Osicki wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2008 18:47:52 + (UTC) Avery Payne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question:
We recently moved to a Samba-based file server, which holds mission-
critical data on it (.dbf files used by our Accounting software, etc.)
The
Thanks Linux Addict, it did work.
I was able to see the swat page finally. Now the question is how to tell it
to accept my root login!
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Santiago Andres Triana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 02:48:14 pm Avery Payne wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:31:48 -0500, John H Terpstra wrote:
Avery,
OK - I'll respond too. I see Jeremy has beaten me to it.
Let me tell you up front, if you want the documentation to be improved
the best thing you can do is
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Santiago Andres Triana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Linux Addict, it did work.
I was able to see the swat page finally. Now the question is how to tell it
to accept my root login!
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Linux Addict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:51:39PM +, Avery Payne wrote:
There's the rub. The existing staff expect to use the in-place GUI
toolset and have no interest in learning command line tools (including
the department head). Yeah, I know, nothing you can do about that
directly, but
Hello all,
I've knocked together a vfs module that does this, basically a worm with
the exception of directories. directories can be renamed if they're
empty, otherwise it's readonly. I'm not sure what the policy is with
posting attachments so won't include it here, give me a shout if your
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:15:02PM -0400, Mike Wilkinson wrote:
Hello all,
I've knocked together a vfs module that does this, basically a worm with
the exception of directories. directories can be renamed if they're
empty, otherwise it's readonly. I'm not sure what the policy is with
Thanks for your reply Vickie,
I actually have the OS root password and samba root password identical. I
did it issuing the command smbpasswd -a root and setting the password as the
same for the OS but swat still won't let me in...
Santiago
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
Jack Downes wrote:
You could handle this outside of Samba with ACLs on your filesystem.
Assuming you use ext3 for the filesys, there are some rather good acl
tools for that.
I don't think POSIX ACLs will do this either.
Brian May
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
Hugo Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I have a Samba PDC chugging away, one of the clients is a Windows 2003
Server machine with Remote Desktop enabled. Regular users can log in to
the 2003 Server just fine *if they are at the actual computer*.
Now, I want people to be
Sorry. I accidentally sent this to the wrong list.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
2008/5/20 Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't think it is possible with Unix or Samba permissions to:
* allow file writes but deny file appends (and other modifications?).
* allow creating files but deny creating folders.
which appears to be what you have done
executing the following command for all users will show their correct group:
root# net rpc user info billybob
but, like i said the following command shows nothing:
root# net rpc group members Domain Users -Uroot
and i still can't get this command to work:
root# net rpc group addmem
On Monday 19 May 2008 02:46:34 pm Leandro Tracchia wrote:
executing the following command for all users will show their correct
group:
root# net rpc user info billybob
but, like i said the following command shows nothing:
root# net rpc group members Domain Users -Uroot
and i still can't
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
On Windows :
Check Create Files / Write Data,
Uncheck: Create Folders / Append Data
I don't think it is possible with Unix or Samba permissions to:
* allow file writes but deny file appends (and other modifications?).
* allow creating files but deny creating folders.
You could handle this outside of Samba with ACLs on your filesystem.
Assuming you use ext3 for the filesys, there are some rather good acl
tools for that.
just a thought,
Jack
Brian May wrote:
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
On Windows :
Check Create Files / Write Data,
Uncheck: Create Folders /
Hi
2008/5/20 Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't think it is possible with Unix or Samba permissions to:
* allow file writes but deny file appends (and other modifications?).
* allow creating files but deny creating folders.
which appears to be what you have done under windows.
This was
sean darcy wrote:
nmbd is using a lot of cpu:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd
log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second::
[2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0]
Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE writes:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Jack Lauman wrote:
For some reason the excel file was stripped in my last post. (See
below). We would appreciate any help we can get on this. Intuit tried
this on their test server and we
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:07:50PM +, Jason Arends wrote:
Thanks for the responses so far... I am actually the tech from Lacerte who
was
working with Jack - I'd like to clarify some things to try to help find a
resolution:
I appreciate the help and time you've been willing to put into
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:24:23AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I'd like to have Jack set up a share on one of the
Windows workstations and point 2 computers at that
database and see if the same issue occurs, just to make
sure we are looking in the right direction.
That seems like a
Hello Gilles,
In your mail from May 12, 2008 (05:47:58) can be read:
G On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:09:07 +0200, Marcin Kucharczyk
G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When system (FreeBSD) is closed unexpectedly tdb files are corrupted.
After boot samba tries to start, but because of corrupted tdb files
it is
Hello again,
Just an update to see if this might help anyone help me, I did upgrade
the Debian machine to the newest Samba that it could handle, 3.0.24, but
alas I still get the error:
Fetching DOMAIN database
Failed to fetch domain database: NT code 0x1c010002
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bob Bregant
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 05:56:56PM +0100, Stephen Borrill wrote:
As a data point, I'm getting crashes on NetBSD 3.1 and samba 3.0.28a on a
FFSv2 partition.
Removing the lib/replace/repdir_getdirentries.c gets it working (even
without directory name
ignore this ..
I was restricting group access via the 'auth' section instead of the 'session'
section
thus causing the account to try and authenticate 4 times as I am restricting
access to
4 groups, doh!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
On Tue, Apr 29, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:05:29PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
I am sure that the OpenBSD team will be interested in fixing these bugs
if they still exist, as they take pride making good quality code. I
can't speak for NetBSD or FreeBSD.
As for the
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 05:56:56PM +0100, Stephen Borrill wrote:
As a data point, I'm getting crashes on NetBSD 3.1 and samba 3.0.28a on a
FFSv2 partition.
Removing the lib/replace/repdir_getdirentries.c gets it working (even
without directory name cache size = 0). I'm not sure of the
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:20:47AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2905 does not work, nor does
removing repdir.m4 entirely. I ended up editing source/Makefile and
removing the .o files from LIBREPLACE_OBJ.
We'll remove
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:44:03PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:20:47AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2905 does not work, nor does
removing repdir.m4 entirely. I ended up editing source/Makefile and
removing the .o
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:10:29PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Certain? I think mbalmer wanted to send a Samba-patch for
systems without his bugfix (i.e. all bsd systems in
production right now). Or did I miss that patch?
I thouhgt the patch he wanted was removing that code,
but I could
On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:09:07 +0200, Marcin Kucharczyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When system (FreeBSD) is closed unexpectedly tdb files are corrupted.
After boot samba tries to start, but because of corrupted tdb files
it is impossible :(
Thanks. I thought about this, but the server didn't reboot.
On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:39:41 +0200, Gilles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't have CUPS installed on this FreeBSD 6.3 host, but don't
provide printer access to SMB clients anyway, but still, I get the
following error in log.smbd when starting up Samba:
For those seeing the same error, it's
On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:30:47 +0200, Volker Lendecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible that a cronjob is kicking in deleting
/var/db/samba/locking.tdb?
Thanks but no, there's no such thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Matt Anderson wrote:
He
has set up everything with static IP addresses for security reasons
I can see nothing security related in such a setup.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On 4/2/07, Allysson Steve Mota Lacerda stevelacerda wrote:
When I try to login on the trusting domain (LABI) using an account of the
trusted domain (ADMIN) the following message is shown: A device connected
to the system is not functioning . My log on to is set to ADMIN.
I had this problem a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
===
The Samba Team is looking for people to help keep our user
community information current, covering development news,
releases, general news, and events. The scope of the
positions will be to:
On 5/1/2008, Matt Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Unfortunately, our network administrator doesn't feel the same way
(that it's not too much trouble). He has set up everything with
static IP addresses for security reasons so we don't have a DHCP
server... and with that no DNS server, since
John H Terpstra schrieb:
On Wednesday 30 April 2008 08:14:17 am Andreas Moroder wrote:
Hello John,
You can name the profile anything you want, so long as the ACLs inside
the profile are correct for the group that needs to be able to access it.
As a general rule, the ACLs should be set so
Matt Anderson sokkerstud_11 at hotmail.com writes:
However, users located in the branch offices (where the BDCs are located),
they
have no trouble authenticating (via logging into windows and accessing shares)
BUT are unable to change their password through the Windows interface, getting
Adam Williams awilliam at mdah.state.ms.us writes:
in the BDC, take out:
passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd -u %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
unix password sync = yes
add:
ldap passwd sync = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Re: Unable to change Windows password on Samba BDC
Adam Williams awilliam at mdah.state.ms.us writes:
in the BDC, take out:
passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd -u %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
unix password sync
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Matt Anderson wrote:
However, we currently assign all IP addresses manually (no DHCP
server). Is there any way (I'm guessing not) I can accomplish this
without having to physically change the network connection settings
on hundreds of client PCs manually?
I use a
Forgot to add:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=242468
For details on netsh.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matt Anderson
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:23 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Re: Unable to change Windows
Dennis McLeod dmcleod at foranyauto.com writes:
Forgot to add:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=242468
For details on netsh.
Awesome! Thanks!
Also -- I'm not sure, but by editing nsswitch.conf on the BDC, for the line for
hosts to include wins, like:
hosts: files dns wins
Seems to
Chris Smith smb23 at realcomputerguy.com writes:
I use a rule of thumb that with =5 computers it saves much time and
trouble to use services such as dhcp, dns, wins, etc. Set up dhcp (and
dns is you don't have it), you will be glad you did.
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the feedback -- I totally
Matt Anderson sokkerstud_11 at hotmail.com writes:
Also -- I'm not sure, but by editing nsswitch.conf on the BDC, for the line
for
hosts to include wins, like:
hosts: files dns wins
SCRATCH THAT. I waited a little longer and tried it again and it failed to find
the domain again. So, I'm
Matt Anderson sokkerstud_11 at hotmail.com writes:
However, users located in the branch offices (where the BDCs are located),
they
have no trouble authenticating (via logging into windows and accessing shares)
BUT are unable to change their password through the Windows interface, getting
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matt Anderson
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 2:49 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Re: Unable to change Windows password on Samba BDC
Chris Smith smb23 at realcomputerguy.com writes:
I use a rule of thumb that with =5 computers
Dennis McLeod dmcleod at foranyauto.com writes:
That's how this place was when I got here. The real issue was with
websurfing control. Current setup is restricting by ip address, not user
(they didn't exist before), so they set up static.
I setup a dhcp server, and used dynamically assigned
Hello John,
You can name the profile anything you want, so long as the ACLs inside the
profile are correct for the group that needs to be able to access it.
As a general rule, the ACLs should be set so that members of the group have
full control. Then select a user who is a member of that
On Wednesday 30 April 2008 08:14:17 am Andreas Moroder wrote:
Hello John,
You can name the profile anything you want, so long as the ACLs inside
the profile are correct for the group that needs to be able to access it.
As a general rule, the ACLs should be set so that members of the
Dave Randolph drandolph at nstarbank.com writes:
Hi, all.
Has anyone else experienced issues with using ntlm_auth in 3.0.28a? We have
had squid set up to use ntlm_auth for quite some time the latest update
seems to break.
Just to give an update on this.
The problem seems to be
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
3.0.28a has known bugs in particular with trusts, so you
will inevitably have to backport stuff from 3.0.28b that
will be done by then. And, I have to agree with Jerry,
having to live with .28a for the next decade in Debian might
be not the best
I have trusts setup between 3 samba domains. Do you have a specific
question regarding setup?
Hans
Adam Williams wrote:
i think you have to create the trusts on both DOMAINS as they only
work in one direction. the official samba how to and reference guide
briefly touches on the subject.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:54:26PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Debian lenny is due out for September 2008. From the news we currently
have, it seems wiser to stick with 3.0.28a rather than a quite
3.0.28a has known bugs in particular with trusts, so you
will inevitably have to backport
So is no one here doing interdomain trusts using two Samba PDC's on two
different subnets? I have been struggling with this problem for a long time
now, and would like some help with it. Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:54 PM, SoUnD WrEcK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been trying off and
On 4/28/2008, Narendra KA ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There are usually some registry changes required for an XP
to connect to a Samba server. I use this:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters
requiresignorseal = REG_DWORD
i think you have to create the trusts on both DOMAINS as they only work
in one direction. the official samba how to and reference guide briefly
touches on the subject.
SoUnD WrEcK wrote:
So is no one here doing interdomain trusts using two Samba PDC's on two
different subnets? I have been
Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Michael,
snip
If we assume that cifs unix
extensions can be made to work, I could bring in my laptop which
contains a SUID root binary and mount it to my workstation.
But (regarding my error correction): ypu always can set the SUID flag on
your laptop's
Thanks for the reply Dragan Krnic, :)
i made the changes into the registry as you told but even still the same
problem persists... :(( earlier the values were 1 i made it zero as told
by you..
Dragan Krnic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/25/2008 08:10 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:06:49 +0200, Sojka Reinhard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK Samba transfers dot files with a hidden attribute. If your users
can see these hidden files or not depends, depends on the setup of the
Windows client.
Thanks for the tip, I hadn't thought of this. I'll just use
from windows i am trying to access like this
Go to Start menu - run and type \\192.168.248.195,
now it will show the list of the samba folders
but when i double click on the folder it prompts
for username and passwd and when i enter
the samba username and passwd it will popup
Cannot be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karolin Seeger wrote:
Release Announcements
=
This is the third preview release of Samba 3.2.0. This is *not*
intended for production environments and is designed for testing
purposes only. Please report any defects via
Hi again,
I updated Samba on both client and server to 3.0.28a. Client is
openSuSE 10.2. Server is Debian Lenny. I noticed that newly created file's
ownership will be changed to username that is used when mounting CIFS volume
(under -o username=xxx,password=xxx) and the permission will
Pakorn Chutinimitkul wrote:
Hi again,
I updated Samba on both client and server to 3.0.28a. Client is
openSuSE 10.2. Server is Debian Lenny. I noticed that newly created file's
ownership will be changed to username that is used when mounting CIFS volume
(under -o
601 - 700 of 8464 matches
Mail list logo
