> > From: Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Samba] Proposal to allow owning group to edit ACLs.
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:47:31 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been spending some time with customers lately and I'
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:07:07AM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote:
>
> That's smart: could it optionally be set/overridden on a
> per-share basis, so the trusted groups could be controlled
> at a fairly fine granularity?
Yes, it will be a per-share parameter.
Jeremy.
--
To
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 07:07:14AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:47:31PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Please let me know what you think - it's easy to add to the current
> > code but I'd like to get some user feedback before I do so.
>
> Yes, great idea I think. Do
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:47:31PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Please let me know what you think - it's easy to add to the current
> code but I'd like to get some user feedback before I do so.
Yes, great idea I think. Do you remember when we talked about that at a
conference about two years ago
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:04:41AM -0400, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> How big a crowbar would be needed to fit the samba4 acls in...?
>
> But generally, yes, this would be good.
Not that big... It's on my list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: ht
Jeremy Allison wrote:
Hi all,
I've been spending some time with customers lately and I've
discovered an interesting thing. Many IT departments completely delegate
the settings on directory and file ACLs to the users who are interested
in the data.
Yes, that's an interpretatio
How big a crowbar would be needed to fit the samba4 acls in...?
But generally, yes, this would be good.
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA
jmcd at us dot ibm dot com
jmcd at samba dot org
Phone: 1-877
> Indeed - as this is a security sensitive area it would definately
> default to the current (safe) behaviour. Especially in case I screw
> up the implementation :-).
>
> Jeremy.
On that note :), let me know when it's implemented, I'll give it some
initial testing.
-Marc
--
To uns
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:25:56PM -0700, Kaplan, Marc wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I think this is really a great idea, and potentially a very valuable
> feature as long as group acl control = false by default.
Indeed - as this is a security sensitive area it would definately
default to the current (saf
Jeremy,
I think this is really a great idea, and potentially a very valuable
feature as long as group acl control = false by default.
-Marc
> -Original Message-
> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g]
> On Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
> Sent: Monday, J
10 matches
Mail list logo
