Re: [Samba] Re: ldap machine suffix fixed?

2004-12-17 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
OK, so what I am hearing is that: 1. It is still a problem. 2. But it isn't a Samba problem, it is an nss_ldap problem. 3. There might be some work arounds. Possible workarounds: A. Burry the Two OU's one deeper and do a subtree search on the parent OU. Works but not scaleable. I disagree

[Samba] Re: ldap machine suffix fixed?

2004-12-16 Thread Jim C.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, so what I am hearing is that: 1. It is still a problem. 2. But it isn't a Samba problem, it is an nss_ldap problem. 3. There might be some work arounds. Possible workarounds: A. Burry the Two OU's one deeper and do a subtree search on the parent