Disclaimer... I know Roaming Profiles are a modern day example of the emperors new
cloths. I also know that 2+2=4.
Let's think Linux/Unix here a second. Preference files are stored in the user's home dir. A user can log in (text or X) multiple times, they will always get the same home dir. Thus
On 9 Dec 2004, at 12:07, Michael Lueck wrote:
Let's think Linux/Unix here a second. Preference files are stored in
the user's home dir. A user can log in (text or X) multiple times,
they will always get the same home dir. Thus each login instance will
share those config files.
The same just
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 18:19, Alex Satrapa wrote:
On 9 Dec 2004, at 12:07, Michael Lueck wrote:
The main disadvantage of the Microsoft Windows approach is the
bandwidth wasted while people log in and out.
In my experience, samba networks also have more problem with profiles becoming
Hmm. Guess I'll try sending this to the right list now.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:46:13 -0800
Subject: Re: [Samba] Reality Check - Roaming Profiles
To: taclug mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I've found useful by way
On 9 Dec 2004, at 16:47, Eric Lester wrote:
Furthermore, I set the browser cache limit to 20MB. This is also
lockable with the Group Policy editor.
The biggest problem for me - by far - is Mozilla storing its cache in
the Documents and Settings folder. Rather than fiddle with cache
size, I'd
