On 05/07/13 16:10, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
On 7/3/2013 4:54 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
My guess is this is related to the Unix extensions. Basically certain
versions of OS X; I can't remember which ones but 10.5 sticks in my
mind but that might be related to symbolic links and it was 10.6 that
w
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At
> least question 1?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>
> On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> >I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in
>
I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At
least question 1?
Thanks,
Brian
On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the
removal of the following config parameters:
security mask
force security mod
On 7/3/2013 4:54 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
My guess is this is related to the Unix extensions. Basically certain
versions of OS X; I can't remember which ones but 10.5 sticks in my
mind but that might be related to symbolic links and it was 10.6 that
was the problem, notice the file server do
On 03/07/13 19:56, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
[SNIP]
I have a situation currently where it looks like I will need to
implement the above 'force' settings in my samba 3.x environment to deal
with some misbehaving OS X clients that insist on stripping group
permissions from files in certain situatio
Hello list,
I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the
removal of the following config parameters:
security mask
force security mode
directory mask
force directory security mode
I have a couple questions regarding this, and haven't really seen any
good info on it,