[Samba] SOLVED: 3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems

2006-07-27 Thread Uwe Laverenz
Hi all, Does anybody have an idea what the problem might be? I have found the reason for the problem: Samba 3.0.23 and 3.0.23a do not parse the passdb backend entry in the smb.conf correctly anymore (tested on Debian Sarge and FreeBSD 6.1). According to the smb.conf man page, it is allowed to

Re: [Samba] SOLVED: 3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems

2006-07-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Uwe Laverenz wrote: According to the smb.conf man page, it is allowed to put the ldap URIs in double qoutes: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap-1.example.com \ ldap://ldap-2.example.com; This does not work for

Re: [Samba] SOLVED: 3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems

2006-07-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This time with the correct file attached. Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: Uwe Laverenz wrote: According to the smb.conf man page, it is allowed to put the ldap URIs in double qoutes: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap-1.example.com \

Re: [Samba] SOLVED: 3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems

2006-07-27 Thread simo
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 07:15 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: Uwe Laverenz wrote: According to the smb.conf man page, it is allowed to put the ldap URIs in double qoutes: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap-1.example.com \ ldap://ldap-2.example.com;

Re: [Samba] SOLVED: 3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems

2006-07-27 Thread Uwe Laverenz
Hi Jerry, On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 07:18:48AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: H...that should work. It certainly wasn't an intentional change. This patch should correct it. I tested it on my FreeBSD workstation and it works perfectly. :) Thank you! Uwe -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [Samba] SOLVED: 3.0.23 for Debian Sarge: LDAP problems

2006-07-27 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Uwe Laverenz wrote: Hi Jerry, On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 07:18:48AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: H...that should work. It certainly wasn't an intentional change. This patch should correct it. I tested it on my FreeBSD workstation