Hi Andrew, Hi Alex, Hi all.
We're really pleased to announce that in this release (S4 rc5), the
sysvolreset command works fine and returns no errors.
The clients download their GPO fine, and the sysvolcheck return no error
as well !
So our problems with SYSVOL ACL are closed for the
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 14:54 +, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 30/10/2012 00:08, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:00:31AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
be a particular trigger - but it shouldn't be able to make a
modification that doesn't go via vfs_acl_xattr.
For Alex,
On 30/10/2012 00:08, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:00:31AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
be a particular trigger - but it shouldn't be able to make a
modification that doesn't go via vfs_acl_xattr.
For Alex, before running the Group Policy tools on WinXP, he gets (at
level
Hi Andrew,
I Updated our S4 instance this morning with the updated git (master). We
still have a problem with one of our 3 GPO. But if I remove one of them,
the same error is displayed with any of the remaining GPO. I need to
remove them all to completely get rid of this message. I also
On 24/10/2012 17:25, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network consisting of one samba4 PDC
(latest git master) and one Windows XP Pro SP3 (fully updated)machine.
I
Hi Andrew, Hi Alex,
Pleased to see that you figured this out.
We've got exactly the same problem from a blank provisioned domain (not
a migration), with a setup with 2 gpo. (Ubuntu 12.04 - S4 rc3).
Since our instance is in a semi-production environment, we'll wait for
your fix. But if needed,
On 26/10/2012 02:37, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 00:34 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 23:27, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 00:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 26/10/2012 00:34, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 23:27, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 09:36 +0200, Olivier BILHAUT wrote:
Hi Andrew, Hi Alex,
Pleased to see that you figured this out.
We've got exactly the same problem from a blank provisioned domain (not
a migration), with a setup with 2 gpo. (Ubuntu 12.04 - S4 rc3).
Since our instance is in a
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 10:44 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
I'm assuming because of the way I laid my directory tree out I could
also just provision as normal and run the tests? Just makes it difficult
to un-provision.
I did a bit of testing last night and sysvolcheck returns no errors
On 26/10/2012 11:03, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 10:44 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
I'm assuming because of the way I laid my directory tree out I could
also just provision as normal and run the tests? Just makes it difficult
to un-provision.
I did a bit of testing last night
On 25/10/2012 02:31, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 18:36 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 17:25, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:01 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 02:31, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 18:36 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 17:25, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex
On 25/10/2012 10:20, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:01 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 02:31, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 18:36 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 17:25, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck shows:
sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
ERROR(class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: VFS ACL on GPO directory
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck shows:
sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
ERROR(class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: VFS ACL on
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck shows:
sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
ERROR(class
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck shows:
sudo
On 25/10/2012 23:27, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
On 25/10/2012 23:27, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
On 26/10/2012 00:34, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 23:27, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32 +0100, Alex Matthews
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 00:34 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 23:27, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:48 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:41 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 25/10/2012 11:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 10:32
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network consisting of one samba4 PDC
(latest git master) and one Windows XP Pro SP3 (fully updated)machine.
I have successfully provisioned an AD Domain and joined the XP machine
to it.
When I run the gpmc on the XP Pro machine and select:
Forest:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network consisting of one samba4 PDC
(latest git master) and one Windows XP Pro SP3 (fully updated)machine.
I have successfully provisioned an AD Domain and joined the XP machine
to it.
When
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network consisting of one samba4 PDC
(latest git master) and one Windows XP Pro SP3 (fully updated)machine.
I have successfully provisioned an AD Domain
On 24/10/2012 17:25, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network consisting of one samba4 PDC
(latest git master) and one Windows XP Pro SP3 (fully updated)machine.
I
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 18:36 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 17:25, Alex Matthews wrote:
On 24/10/2012 12:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:49 +0100, Alex Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a virtual testing network consisting of one samba4 PDC
(latest git
27 matches
Mail list logo
