At first, has your file system already enabled xattr?
For example, are following commands successfull?
# touch test.txt
# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt
# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt
# getfattr -d test.txt
# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt
And your Samba
From: Dmitry Mordovin
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:39:44 +0400
> Now, when I try to Apply hidden attribute, popup message - Error change
> file attributes. Access Denied.
At first, has your file system already enabled xattr?
For example, are following commands successfull?
# touch test.txt
# se
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store Windows ACLs, need only DOS attrs (hidden file attr).
What Is enough to add to my smb.conf?
'store dos attributes (S) or 'map hidden (S)' or together or else?
I use:
store dos attributes = yes
map readonly = no
map system = no
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:17:21PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
>
> >>Added to global section
> >>
> >>vfs objects = acl_xattr
> >>
> >>
> >>No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
> >You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
> >
> >Have you tried using setfattr on
Added to global section
vfs objects = acl_xattr
No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
Have you tried using setfattr on that filesystem ? Does it work ?
Jeremy.
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:36:51PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 04:26 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> >On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
> >
> >[SNIP]
> >
> >>Samba config:
> >>
> >>[global]
> >>workgroup = HOME
> >>security = share
> >>max log size = 1024
> >
On 12/09/2011 04:26 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
Samba config:
[global]
workgroup = HOME
security = share
max log size = 1024
store dos attributes = yes
map archive = no
map read only = no
map hidden = no
map system = no
create m
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
> Samba config:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = HOME
> security = share
> max log size = 1024
> store dos attributes = yes
> map archive = no
> map read only = no
> map hidden = no
> map system = no
> create mode = 777
> directory mode
Hello All!
Can't make Samba use acl and extended user attributes to save DOS file
attributes.
Please, help me configure properly.
My steps on Windows XP:
1 - Open share
2 - Open property of file 1122/22.bmp
3 - Check file attribute: hidden
4 - Click Apply
5 - Click Close
6 - Open property ag
From: Oliver Guerino
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:29:44 -0300
> What happened is the following:
> My network has windows and linux clients, the permissions described above
> operates normally with the windows client, but when I try to connect
> with the linux client does not operates.
As far as I ex
Hello,
I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment.
I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is
Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47.
Below my configurations files:
#/etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1
#smb.conf
[data]
comment
Hello,
I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment.
I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is
Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47.
Below my configurations files:
#/etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1
#smb.conf
[data]
comment
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:26:10AM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Dear Jeremy and samba team ,
>
> This is suresh from EMC.I am having samba 3.4.8 on my NAS with posix acls
> support.
>
>
>
> When a backup software backs up files and folders, it typically backs up the
> securit
Dear Jeremy and samba team ,
This is suresh from EMC.I am having samba 3.4.8 on my NAS with posix acls
support.
When a backup software backs up files and folders, it typically backs up the
security settings on the files/folders
too. Then during restore, the software will try to restore th
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
>> Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba
>> which got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that
>> ACL suppo
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:52:46PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Thanks this helps.
Let me know if you really need the "first version with ACL
support" and I'll track it down.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.sa
Thanks this helps.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; j...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
> got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
> support.
>
> Can you please confirm on this?.
Oh yes, we've had
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
support.
Can you please confirm on this?.
Thanks
Suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: ht
10 9:13 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: smb...@chrissmith.org; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:40AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Thanks smith for the quick reply. what
Thanks Smith. This explains in detail.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Chris Smith [mailto:smb...@chrissmith.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:19 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:40AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
> source code prevent the changing setting rw access to "test_subfolder" user1
> , since he has only read only access on the share "test".
The pro
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:04 PM, wrote:
> it looks like code is not designed like this.
>
> if you don't mind , Can you please explain this ,
>
> --
> - although you would be asking
> it to restrict the admin's rights, which wouldn't be proper behavior.
> Plus it then wouldn't work like a
sts.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:24 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, wrote:
> Thanks smith for the q
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, wrote:
> Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
> source code prevent the changing setting rw access to "test_subfolder" user1
> , since he has only read only access on the share "test".
I suppose you could patch it to do so -
ba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:25 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> Share level security will take precedence over
> file level security when connected via the share.
Sorry about that: more accurate would be to state that the most
restrictive security permissions will be active. If share level
permissions allo
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM, wrote:
> 1) created share "test" given read and write access to the user "admin" and
> read only access to user "user1".
>
> 2) from my windows PC logged into the samba share "test " with "admin" user
> . created subfolder in that "test_subfolder".
>
> 3) on th
@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict user
security setting
Dear friends, I am having following issue on my samba device . Please help me
on this.
1) created share "test" given read and write access to the user "admin" and
Dear friends, I am having following issue on my samba device . Please help me
on this.
1) created share "test" given read and write access to the user "admin" and
read only access to user "user1".
2) from my windows PC logged into the samba share "test " with "admin" user .
created subfolder
Dear friends,
I am facing the problem while adding the ACL user into subfolder security
permissions from some of the WORKGROUPS PCs . While adding the ACL user itself
it is asking for samba login credentials ( I did not notice this behavior in
other PC's ) and after entering it, it is displ
Dear samba team,
Please help me on the below issue.
I have connected a samba share from my device to my windows XP
machine . that samba share has ACL support enabled .
1) The shared folder names is "user1" and the user name I logged into
samba share is also user1.
2) I have created
All my fault. I forget to execute "make clean" before compiling samba
with ACL support.
--
Shaochun Wang(王绍春)
PH.D Candidate
State Key Laboratory of Computer Science,
Institute of Software,
Chinese Academy of Sciences
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
Hi, all
It seems that samba-3.4.1 still has something wrong with ACL for
open-for-delete operation. I give a group of users full access, which
means rwx permission, to a directory and make this as the default ACL
for this directory. Then I found that I can do anthing as a member of
that group but
Harry Jede wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. April 2009 15:33 schrieb David Vaz:
>
>> I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
>> with acl support.
>>
>> The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it
>> in different machines.
>>
>> In a given share, user
Am Montag, 27. April 2009 15:33 schrieb David Vaz:
> I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
> with acl support.
>
> The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it
> in different machines.
>
> In a given share, user "A" is the owner of the folder
I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
with acl support.
The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it in
different machines.
In a given share, user "A" is the owner of the folder "test", inside
this folder there is a office file "test.doc" fo
Is that the only option? We've noticed the same behavior of osx clients
recently, but we also have linux clients connecting and I don't wish to
degrade the experience by disabling unix extensions.
What is effect of disabling unix extensions? At least with it acls work
on OSX too.
--
Eero
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:19:19 James Peach wrote:
> 2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen :
> > I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
> >
> > Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
> > says access denied to every directory that is using acl.
> >
> > Is OSX
2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen :
> I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
>
> Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard says
> access denied to every directory that is using acl.
>
> Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl or is this OSX bug?
>
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
says access denied to every directory that is using acl.
Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl or is this OSX
bug? Is there any solution on OSX that
Hello
I am using samba 3.2.1 version on centos 5.2 with ldap. Everything is working
fine as i expected. I have shared a share , say , NOA on samba server.
Now i log into windows and access the share and tried to give rights on share
by right click > properties > security . I want to give a grou
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17:10PM +0100, Keith Sudbury wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a windows 2003 SBS handling domain logins, I also have an Ubuntu
> machine being used as a file server this is using winbind and is on the
> domain I can chown dirs etc with Active Directory users.
>
> However
Hi Guys,
I have a windows 2003 SBS handling domain logins, I also have an Ubuntu
machine being used as a file server this is using winbind and is on the
domain I can chown dirs etc with Active Directory users.
However I have the following problem, I need to allow certain users to
access some
I have set up samba as a member of w2k the domain, has made Share with
ACL support. I distribute the rights through Windows "ticks"
sucsessfully. But I can not be remove them - windows says that "You can
not remove the user because this object is inheriting permission from
his parent...". After I
Hi, nix.
> I have set up samba as a member of w2k the domain, has made Share with
> ACL support. I distribute the rights through Windows "ticks"
> sucsessfully. But I can not be remove them - windows says that "You can
> not remove the user because this object is inheriting permission from
> his
I have set up samba as a member of w2k the domain, has made Share with
ACL support. I distribute the rights through Windows "ticks"
sucsessfully. But I can not be remove them - windows says that "You can
not remove the user because this object is inheriting permission from
his parent...". After I
Vadim Vatlin wrote:
Hi there.
I need help.
I installed samba + nt acl.
I switched on acl on the filesystem, added users in the /etc/passwd
and in the tdb database samba, using tdbedit.
When I logged in the share, I created a test file, clicked on the
right mouse button, chose properties->se
Hi there.
I need help.
I installed samba + nt acl.
I switched on acl on the filesystem, added users in the /etc/passwd and
in the tdb database samba, using tdbedit.
When I logged in the share, I created a test file, clicked on the right
mouse button, chose properties->security.
And When I c
ystem?
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H.Kitagawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba ACL bug?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: S
Hi Jerrry
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H.Kitagawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba ACL bug?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiro,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] pub]# getfacl testfolder
> # file: testfolder
> # owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # group: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> user::rwx
> mask::rwx
> mask::rwx
> other::---
Any idea why the mask listed twice here. What file system is
this?
>
Hello,
My name is Hiro.
I'm using samba 3.0.21b-2(acl) and RHEL4.1(kernel 2.6.9-11.ELsmp) + AD Server
Following problem:
When the attribute of the group of the folder was set to a full control twice,
the member of the group became inaccessible.
I want to know this problem is BUG or SPEC.
One
Hello,
My name is Hiro.
I'm using samba 3.0.21b-2(acl) and RHEL4.1(kernel 2.6.9-11.ELsmp) + AD Server
Following problem:
When the attribute of the group of the folder was set to a full control twice,
the member of the group became inaccessible.
I want to know this problem is BUG or SPEC.
One
David,
I think you'll find this document helpful. I do not know for certain if the
permissions are the same on Linux, but it _should_ be.
http://docs.hp.com/en/B8725-90101/ch03s04.html
On 9/27/06, Graham, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings,
I seem to have Samba+AD+ACL's working on
Greetings,
I seem to have Samba+AD+ACL's working on a RH ES4 server; however, I'm
looking for clarification in regard to how the ACL's differ between
windows and samba... or if they differ?
With windows ACL's, I can give out user permission traverse directory,
but not read its contents. Th
Hello,
Could you tell am I right in case: I am not able to add other
users/groups than unix's user: owner,owner's group and others to
folders/files localized on Samba server, despite doing that as root from
XP client station. I also work without nt acl support = off. This is
normal? I am aski
Hello,
Sorry, if you have recived this message already, but I have problem with
my email service.
Could you tell am I right in case: I am not able to add other
users/groups than unix's user: owner,owner's group and others to
folders/files localized on Samba server, despite doing that as root
Hi,
I have FC3 with samba-3.0.10-1.fc3, samba-common and samba-client joined to
Windows 2003 AD with the followings library installed:
ldd /usr/sbin/winbindd
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0xf6e14000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0xf6e0)
libnsl.so.1 => /
> Dear Guys,
>
> I have noticed that one of our domain users folder in
> /var/lib/samba/profiles has a '+' on the end of their username folder
> and all the files in their profile too.
>
> I know this is to do with ACL's and I know Samba can translate Windows
> ACL's to filesystem acls, but where
Dear Guys,
I have noticed that one of our domain users folder in
/var/lib/samba/profiles has a '+' on the end of their username folder
and all the files in their profile too.
I know this is to do with ACL's and I know Samba can translate Windows
ACL's to filesystem acls, but where can I find out
Maybe this helps:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-May/105227.html
Greets,
Holger
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005 16:10 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Samba 3.0.14a on Debian Sarge,
> The Samba server is member of a windows2000 Domain, named NT1
>
> Problem that I have i
Hi,
I'm running Samba 3.0.14a on Debian Sarge,
The Samba server is member of a windows2000 Domain, named NT1
Problem that I have is that, when setting up the rights on a directory, and
checking the option to change the rights on the subdirectories and files,
after a while the rights are no more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmmm. Silly SNAP systems do what I want (squash "everyone" if it is
- ---). Anyone know what modifications they make to Samba?
I'm using GuardianOS 3.0.099, and it seems to have some extended ACLs
that I don't recognize.
user::rwxdpo
user:admin:rwxdpo
g
Hi,
you got the same problem, many win admins have,
removing group everyone happens everywhere( in this group is everyone g
)in big windows hosting active dir companies, this makes their helpdesks
crazy *g.
Also deny permissions functions are simply a hoax by ms
I know windows book writers which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My users are complaining that to remove "Everyone" permissions from a
folder's ACL they have to "Deny" all permissions. This causes a Windows
warning to appear: "You have denied everyone access to New Folder. No
one will be able to access New Folder and
Could you explai how should I use the NT Server Manager Tool ?(I don't know
it)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Malte Woelky wrote:
Hallo,
Friday, July 2, 2004, 3:09:26 PM, you wrote:
If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
2 using yum to update the kernel and it works fine.
SO> yum?
Yellowdog Update Manager - Fedora update tool
Actually, that's 'Yellow dog Updater, Modif
Hallo,
Friday, July 2, 2004, 3:09:26 PM, you wrote:
>> If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
>> 2 using yum to update the kernel and it works fine.
SO> yum?
Yellowdog Update Manager - Fedora update tool
--
Best regards,
Maltemailto:[EMAIL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 5:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba + ACL
I wish to realize a file-server with SAMBA integrated in my network
domain
(Windows NT4 PDC).
To manage the user access for each share in the Samba file-server, I
would
use Active Control
==
-Original Message-
From: Simon Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2004 14:09
To: Mark Lidstone
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba + ACL
> If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
> 2 using yum to update the kernel and it works
> If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
> 2 using yum to update the kernel and it works fine.
yum?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
de on behalf of BMT SeaTech Limited.
==
-Original Message-
From: Marco Gavaldo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2004 10:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba + ACL
I wish to realize a file-server with SA
Marco Gavaldo schrieb:
I wish to realize a file-server with SAMBA integrated in my network domain
(Windows NT4 PDC).
To manage the user access for each share in the Samba file-server, I would
use Active Control Lists.
ACCESS Control Lists
Anyone can tell me
- what type and version of Linux is be
I wish to realize a file-server with SAMBA integrated in my network domain
(Windows NT4 PDC).
To manage the user access for each share in the Samba file-server, I would
use Active Control Lists.
Anyone can tell me
- what type and version of Linux is best for my purpose ?
- what Samba version is be
I did not know that webmin had a module to backup files as well as ACLs
(all i could find was a dump module), could you give me a url to get the
module from pls?
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 21:42, Hamish wrote:
Hello all
I am looking for a good backup solution for samba shares,
: Samba List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|cc :
|
| Objet : [Samba] Samba
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 21:42, Hamish wrote:
> Hello all
> I am looking for a good backup solution for samba shares, I do not mean
> to start a jihad between rival backup religions, but I would appreciate
> any suggestions.
> I have tried star and love it, unfortunately there does not seem to be a
Hello all
I am looking for a good backup solution for samba shares, I do not mean
to start a jihad between rival backup religions, but I would appreciate
any suggestions.
I have tried star and love it, unfortunately there does not seem to be a
gui or any frontend that can be used with it (it nee
hi,
I'm using samba with acl on AIX and FreeBSD systems. But, when I copy or
move files from a Windows 2000 Share to the Samba Share I lost the
privileges of that files/folders. Are there a solution for it?
Thanks,
mAnEh ...
Ps.: Sorry, but I dont speak English :) ...
--
To unsubscribe f
Hi!
I am running samba-2.2.7a with winbind and acl. I've setup share with
default owner 'administrator' and group owner 'Domain Admins' and let
access to others throw acl. Trouble is, when some user from 'Domain
Admins' group changes some file, he also changes user and group owner to
'his_user
Dear All,
I am running samba 2.2.7-5 on a RH 8.0 box with 2.4.20-18 kernel and
I am trying to migrate a Win2K Server to Samba.
The samba RPM has --with-acl-support activated.
I manually add all the net users into the samba box using the command
useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null -m username
and
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Waider,
> Would you mind commenting further on what you had to do to get RedHat 8.0
> support ACLs.
>
> Thanks
> K.C.
Sure:
* Download kernel SRPM
* Modify patches[1]
* Spend several hours rebuilding kernel packages
[1] is obviously the tricky bit. I'm t
Waider,
Would you mind commenting further on what you had to do to get RedHat 8.0
support ACLs.
Thanks
K.C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On December 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
> think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
> fileutils, etc. I'm currently rebuilding various bits and pieces to
> see if I can make it work without too much grief.
Ok
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> So it looks like the option is turned on in the kernel config, but the
> patch is not actually in the kernel.
No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
fileutils, e
On December 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
> > enabled by default.
>
> I installed RedHat 8.0 and acl on ext2/3 didn't work, with the precompiled
> Kernel from SGI and xfs acl work fine.
Yup, this is why I said "appear to have"
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 19:14:01 +
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
> > bestbits.
> >
> > xfs is a better choice and has the acl stuff built in.
>
> Actually, RedHat's recent pre
I'm not so sure about this... but looking at the changelog for Red Hat's
2.4.18-18.7.x kernel says (for RH 7.2) :
grep -B 2 -i acl kernel-2.4.spec
* Mon Aug 12 2002 Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- ACLs removed for now because of stability and correctness problem
If you grep the config f
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
> bestbits.
>
> xfs is a better choice and has the acl stuff built in.
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
enabled by default.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 13:06, Saulius Gurklys wrote:
> Hello,
> short and maybe stupid question - can samba work with ACL when
> fs is etx2(ext3)?(i think no, but not sure) If NO what file system I need
> to make use of ACLs?
acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
best
Hello,
short and maybe stupid question - can samba work with ACL when
fs is etx2(ext3)?(i think no, but not sure) If NO what file system I need
to make use of ACLs?
Thanks,
--
Saulius
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mail
Hello,
I'm currently experiencing a problem concerning Samba 2.2.3a which is
running on RedHat 7.3 kernel 2.4.18 configured with ACLS.
While trying to upgrade the kernel to support LFS 2GB files, a reboot was performed
after the successful recompilation and installation of new filesystem t
HI all,
I had install samba 2.2.3a-6 on Linux RedHat 7.3. I had recompile the kernel
support ACL.
I know that with samba >= 2.2 support ACL too
but it's seem there something wrong here when i got this mess.
It's look like samba does not support ACL
Are there anyone could help me get out of this pr
94 matches
Mail list logo