Dear Jeremy
Here you go :-). Download the jumbo patch for 3.5.6 here:
http://samba.org/~jra/samba-3-5-x-acl-jumbo-patch.tgz
Please test and give me feedback !
Thank you for caring about this.
I successfully patched the source code. Unfortunately, when I tried to
compile it, I hit some
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:51:45PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Dear Jeremy
Here you go :-). Download the jumbo patch for 3.5.6 here:
http://samba.org/~jra/samba-3-5-x-acl-jumbo-patch.tgz
Please test and give me feedback !
Thank you for caring about this.
I successfully patched the
So, for me the best bet is this: are you willing to include these
patches in the next release of Samba (3.5.7 ?)?
Yes, so long as all testing passes.
Ok, I managed to compile everything. I will start testing soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:33:34PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
FYI. I've just committed a jumbo ACL patch for v3-6-test (and am currently
looking at backporting this to 3.5.x) which I hope will fix several issues
with storing ACLs in xattrs and getting full Windows ACL compatibility.
That
I had not realized that the ACL module would store both sets of information.
Please note that I *didn't* state that. What I said is that you can use
Extended Attributes to *also* store ACL information. ACL information
will be stored under a different attribute, which in this case is called
While testing my Samba configuration, I found that permissions are being set
to 'special' for directories being copied from Windows instead of the ACL
being fully populated. Does Samba 3.6 fully implement ACLS, or are there
further configuration steps for storing the ACL information for
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:04:29AM -0700, Derek Lewis wrote:
I have ACLs working for files with the following set in my share
definitions:
inherit permissions = yes
inherit acls=yes
map acl inherit=yes
vfs_objects = acl_tdb
While testing my Samba configuration, I found that
FYI. I've just committed a jumbo ACL patch for v3-6-test (and am currently
looking at backporting this to 3.5.x) which I hope will fix several issues
with storing ACLs in xattrs and getting full Windows ACL compatibility.
That would be *very* nice, especially the backporting to 3.5.x part!
I have ACLs working for files with the following set in my share
definitions:
inherit permissions = yes
inherit acls=yes
map acl inherit=yes
vfs_objects = acl_tdb
While testing my Samba configuration, I found that permissions are being set
to 'special' for directories being copied from
On 17 October 2010 13:04, Derek Lewis dle...@mtu.edu wrote:
[...]
Note, I have used a TDB for ACLs since I have extended attributes enabled on
the file system level to store timestamp information.
I could be wrong, but I think the tdb is for if your filesystem does
NOT support extended
Note, I have used a TDB for ACLs since I have extended attributes enabled on
the file system level to store timestamp information.
As Michael Wood pointed out in a reply to you, the tdb is to be used
when your filesystem does
NOT support extended attributes.
You can use Extended Attributes
11 matches
Mail list logo
