RE: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-21 Thread Shannon Johnson
University Park, PA 16802 Phone: (814) 865-8267 -Original Message- From: tms3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:30 PM To: Paul Gienger Cc: Shannon Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache Yep

[Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread Shannon Johnson
I have a feeling I may have lost focus on the issue in some of my previous messages... so here's my dilemma. I have several Windows (2000 and XP) clients, and several Linux (Red Hat Enterprise 3, 2.4.21 kernel) clients. I've got a couple servers, one is currently Windows 2000 Server, and one is

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread tms3
Without knowing the roles of the servers, I can't understand the desperation of the problem. User homes on W2k3, other stuff on samba--why is this a problem? Shannon Johnson wrote: I have a feeling I may have lost focus on the issue in some of my previous messages... so here's my dilemma. I

RE: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread Shannon Johnson
] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:45 PM To: Shannon Johnson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache Without knowing the roles of the servers, I can't understand the desperation of the problem. User homes on W2k3, other stuff on samba--why is this a problem

RE: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread Aaron Grewell
SNIP I can't recompile the kernel to support CIFS as a module (don't know why... just won't work... I'll give you the IP and root's password if you'd like to have a go at it), and I can't upgrade to the 2.6 kernel because I'm using Red Hat Enterprise, which uses a modified version of the kernel.

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread Paul Gienger
I'm very open to suggestions... I've just about exhausted all the options I can think of... so if anybody has any advice, please let me know. From what I can gather, you've got 2003 AD doing user management RHEL for a (home) fileserver Clients of all flavors Have you thoroughly investigated just

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread Paul Gienger
Shannon Johnson wrote: From what I can gather, you've got 2003 AD doing user management RHEL for a (home) fileserver Clients of all flavors Have you thoroughly investigated just using nfs and autofs to do home directory mounting and decided you can't use it for one reason or another? What are

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 + Win2k = Headache

2004-05-20 Thread tms3
Yep. And you can populate ADS with the ldap stuff, automatically, but only one way. From ldap to W2k. I've got an overview on this form the University of Michigain, but at the office. On vacation till tuesday. Paul Gienger wrote: Shannon Johnson wrote: From what I can gather, you've got

[Samba] Samba and a headache

2003-02-11 Thread Harald Milz
Hello List: I have a problem i can't work around. Look [root@Server samba]# smbclient //server/homes -UHarald%pass added interface ip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx bcast=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx nmask=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx added interface ip=192.168.100.1 bcast=192.168.100.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Domain=[INTSER] OS=[Unix]