Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-18 Thread John Horn
This isn't the first time I've seen MS stuff 15 pounds of horse manure in a nine pound sack. On 2003.03.17 15:11 Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 05:45, erx wrote: > > Has anyone seen this: > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/advantage.asp > > > > A

RE: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread Bob Crandell
vertising" doesn't apply to Microsoft. > > > >ERX > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:11 PM >>To: erx >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba vs Wi

Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 05:45, erx wrote: > Has anyone seen this: > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/advantage.asp > > And has anyone from the Samba team posted a response? It seems like some of > the information presented there is contrary to what I know about Samba.

RE: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread Khanh Tran
H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:11 PM >To: erx >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK > > >On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, erx wrote: > >> Has anyone seen this: >> >http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedd

RE: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread John H Terpstra
look forward to your contribution. - John T. > > > > ERX > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:11 PM > >To: erx > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [Samba] S

RE: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread erx
TED] >Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:11 PM >To: erx >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK > > >On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, erx wrote: > >> Has anyone seen this: >> >http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/adva >

Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread John H Terpstra
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, erx wrote: > Has anyone seen this: > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/advantage.asp > > And has anyone from the Samba team posted a response? It seems like some of > the information presented there is contrary to what I know about Samba. Why re

Re: [Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK; my observations...

2003-03-17 Thread bkrusic
Hi, I would like to post my thoughts. First, our file server performance and rendering times are 1/3 faster using a Linux backbone (I have detailed files). Our FTP site and Web site are more reliable and faster using Linux than Windows. I am also deploying Linux workstations to augment/replace

[Samba] Samba vs Windows SAK

2003-03-17 Thread erx
Has anyone seen this: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/Embedded/sak/evaluation/compare/advantage.asp And has anyone from the Samba team posted a response? It seems like some of the information presented there is contrary to what I know about Samba. ERX -- To unsubscribe from this list go to t