Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-04-22 Thread James Peach
2009/4/21 Pietro Battiston : > Il giorno lun, 16/02/2009 alle 23.03 -0800, Jeremy Allison ha scritto: >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:42:48PM -0800, James Peach wrote: >> > >> > Volker's suggestion is the best. >> > >> > Pietro should to and log a >> > bug ag

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-04-22 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno lun, 16/02/2009 alle 23.03 -0800, Jeremy Allison ha scritto: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:42:48PM -0800, James Peach wrote: > > > > Volker's suggestion is the best. > > > > Pietro should to and log a > > bug against the TIme Capsule. It would be

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-18 Thread James Peach
2009/2/18 Pietro Battiston : > Il giorno lun, 16/02/2009 alle 21.42 -0800, James Peach ha scritto: > >> Pietro should to and log a >> bug against the TIme Capsule. It would be best to attach a packet >> trace to the bug. Follow the instructions here: >> >>

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-18 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno lun, 16/02/2009 alle 21.42 -0800, James Peach ha scritto: > Pietro should to and log a > bug against the TIme Capsule. It would be best to attach a packet > trace to the bug. Follow the instructions here: > >

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-17 Thread James Peach
2009/2/16 Jeremy Allison : > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:42:48PM -0800, James Peach wrote: >> >> Volker's suggestion is the best. >> >> Pietro should to and log a >> bug against the TIme Capsule. It would be best to attach a packet >> trace to the bug. Follo

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-17 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:44:48AM -0800, James Peach wrote: > 2009/2/16 Jeremy Allison : > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:42:48PM -0800, James Peach wrote: > >> > >> Volker's suggestion is the best. > >> > >> Pietro should to and log a > >> bug against the T

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-16 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:42:48PM -0800, James Peach wrote: > > Volker's suggestion is the best. > > Pietro should to and log a > bug against the TIme Capsule. It would be best to attach a packet > trace to the bug. Follow the instructions here: > >

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-16 Thread James Peach
2009/2/16 Jeremy Allison : > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:01:53PM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: >> Some update to the mail below: if I understand correctly, there are two >> different problems showing up: >> 1) mount.cifs and the Time Capsule (I have no idea on which front the >> problem is) don't s

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-16 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:01:53PM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: > Some update to the mail below: if I understand correctly, there are two > different problems showing up: > 1) mount.cifs and the Time Capsule (I have no idea on which front the > problem is) don't seem to be able to handshake corre

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-16 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 05:01:53PM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: > Some update to the mail below: if I understand correctly, there are two > different problems showing up: > 1) mount.cifs and the Time Capsule (I have no idea on which front the > problem is) don't seem to be able to handshake corre

Re: [Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-16 Thread Pietro Battiston
Some update to the mail below: if I understand correctly, there are two different problems showing up: 1) mount.cifs and the Time Capsule (I have no idea on which front the problem is) don't seem to be able to handshake correctly if the share name contains whitespaces. I didn't notice at first glan

[Samba] Time capsule and "bad smb"

2009-02-13 Thread Pietro Battiston
Hello, I'm having trouble connecting to an Apple Time Capsule's smb shares. The connection doesn't work, and with "dmesg" I see the following message, repeated every time I try: [26937.531511] CIFS VFS: RFC1001 size 39 bigger than SMB for Mid=4 [26937.531580] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data