Hello,
After upgrade samba on my 64-bit RHEL4 server from version `3.0.31` to
`3.5.3` everything just works fine, but I only have issues with
`usrmgr.exe`.
Before upgrade, I could manage domain accounts with this utility. Now it say
Access denied after running without any detailed information.
I
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:03:08PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
After upgrade samba on my 64-bit RHEL4 server from version `3.0.31` to
`3.5.3` everything just works fine, but I only have issues with
`usrmgr.exe`.
Before upgrade, I could manage domain accounts with this utility. Now it say
Hello Volker,
Thanks for the quick answer.
Yes, I'm using LDAP backend with samba. I will test the issue when 5.3.4
will be released.
2010/6/13 Volker Lendecke volker.lende...@sernet.de
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:03:08PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
After upgrade samba on my 64-bit RHEL4
Hi,
We are running samba 3.0.28 on RHEL 5 as a PDC serving around 1000
active users . This domain was vampired from aWindows NT 4 domain a few
years ago. OpenLDAP 2.2.13 is used as the back end user database. One
of the problems we have is that usrmgr.exe does not display any
groups. I
Hi,
We are running samba 3.0.28 with Openldap 2.2.13 as a Windows PDC. The
OS is Red Hat RHEL5.
We also have some VMWare servers. A VMWare management toolqueries the
PDC for users. For some reason, it cannot find some users even given
the complete uid. To diagnose the problem, I ran the
Hi
I have set up my own domain on Debian stable (3.0.14a-3sarge2) and can log in
etc.
I have just gone to administrate my user accounts using the server tool
(usrmgr.exe) from microsoft (i know it is not the problem of samba to support
these but...) when i select my new domain 'EDDU' i get the
Nope, these should be unix groups..
afaik, unix groups don't allow 'space' in there names...
so 'Domain Users' will not work, 'domain_users' would..
dunno..
Holger Wesser wrote:
'net groupmap list' shows (an extract):
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-995113423-1751251495-2796976809-512) - Domain
sorry, i really don't know, how to fix the problem. until to 3.0.22
everything worked fine. in the changelog to 3.0.23 i read:
New handling of unmapped users and groups
what does this mean? i never got in contact with manual mappings,
because i used the smbldap-populate tool. does it mean, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holger Wesser wrote:
sorry, i really don't know, how to fix the problem. until to 3.0.22
everything worked fine. in the changelog to 3.0.23 i read:
New handling of unmapped users and groups
what does this mean? i never got in contact with
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:23:41PM +0200, Holger Wesser wrote:
New handling of unmapped users and groups
what does this mean?
This means that we have cleaned up a big mess that has
caused very difficult to diagnose problems for quite a
number of people.
It comes down to a different handling
'net groupmap list' shows (an extract):
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-995113423-1751251495-2796976809-512) - Domain
Admins
Domain Users (S-1-5-21-995113423-1751251495-2796976809-513) - Domain Users
Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-995113423-1751251495-2796976809-514) - Domain
Guests
Domain Computers
Hi there,
I'm running Debian Sarge with the sernet-packages of Samba. Yesterday I
updated from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23. When I start the usrmgr.exe, I still are
able to modify users but I cannot see/modify groups anymore.
Where could I start to find the problem?
Thanks.
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from
what do you see with the 'net groupmap list' command..
maybe you need to map them manually, (net group add .)
coz' this became the default behavior for the 3.0.23 version...
Cheers
Collen
Holger Wesser wrote:
Hi there,
I'm running Debian Sarge with the sernet-packages of Samba.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holger Wesser wrote:
Hi there,
I'm running Debian Sarge with the sernet-packages of Samba.
Yesterday I updated from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23. When I start
the usrmgr.exe, I still are able to modify users but
I cannot see/modify groups anymore.
Hello,
I have the same problem this post :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=114881731013700w=2
After read the solution,
What can i do for an production server on next week ?
samba 3.0.22 is stable version, anybody know if it fixed this bug.
thanks.
Rodolphe
--
To unsubscribe from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom wrote:
It seems the 3.0.23rc1 version has fixed this issue
on my PDC.
Excellent! Thanks for the testing and feedback.
cheers, jerry
=
Samba
It seems the 3.0.23rc1 version has fixed this issue on my PDC.
Thank you.
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom wrote:
I've been having this problem on one of my PDC's where when using usrmgr
from a windows box, I get the error: The group name could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom wrote:
I've been having this problem on one of my PDC's where when using usrmgr
from a windows box, I get the error: The group name could not be found.
Since all of the groups samba is interested in exist and since they are
all mapped to the
I've been having this problem on one of my PDC's where when using usrmgr
from a windows box, I get the error: The group name could not be found.
Since all of the groups samba is interested in exist and since they are
all mapped to the appropriate posix groups I'm not sure where to start
with
same here, thx
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled samba with the patch and installed it.
both of usrmgr and srvmgr are working now.
Thanks.
Il giorno gio, 01/09/2005 alle 14.09 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter ha
scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Umberto Zanatta
Hi,
I've compiled samba with the patch and installed it.
both of usrmgr and srvmgr are working now.
Thanks.
Il giorno gio, 01/09/2005 alle 14.09 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter ha
scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| Hi,
|
| my test system is a
Samba is compiled by sernet, I will try to recompile without libaio.
thanks.
Il giorno sab, 03/09/2005 alle 01.24 +0200, Thomas Bork ha scritto:
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| Sep 1 20:44:41 provtvlp smbd[7699]: Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE
| handler
I have this message, if 3.0.20 was
I have not tested yet because the server is a PDC Server (over 400
people log on Samba everyday).
I'm going to install the patch on the weekend.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
uz
I do hope the problem is not on SLES 8
Il giorno gio, 01/09/2005 alle 14.09 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter ha
scritto:
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE doesn't work anymore.
I have not tested yet because the server is a PDC Server (over 400 people
log on Samba everyday).
I'm going to install the patch on the weekend.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
uz
I do hope the problem
***
Best Regards,
Bruno Guerreiro
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 1 de Setembro de 2005 20:10
To: Umberto Zanatta
Cc: Bruno Guerreiro; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE doesn't work
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| Sep 1 20:44:41 provtvlp smbd[7699]: Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE
| handler
I have this message, if 3.0.20 was compiled with aio support - even if
aio support in smb.conf is deactivated with
aio read size =
aio write size =
This leads here to problems with
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:24:06AM +0200, Thomas Bork wrote:
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| Sep 1 20:44:41 provtvlp smbd[7699]: Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE
| handler
I have this message, if 3.0.20 was compiled with aio support - even if
aio support in smb.conf is deactivated with
aio
Jeremy Allison wrote:
| Sep 1 20:44:41 provtvlp smbd[7699]: Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE
| handler
I have this message, if 3.0.20 was compiled with aio support - even if
[...]
aio support is exteremly experimental. I did it to learn about
what effects this would have on our performance
it to you.
Best Regards,
Bruno Guerreiro
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quarta-feira, 31 de Agosto de 2005 17:45
To: Umberto Zanatta
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE doesn't work anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Guerreiro wrote:
| Hi,
| I've got the same problem (
| http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-August/109895.html ).
| It seems this has been laying around since RC1/2 (
| http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-August/109465.html )
| I've
Where goes.
The log.vmxp is for the client running usrmgr
Best regards,
Bruno Guerreiro
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 1 de Setembro de 2005 11:56
To: Bruno Guerreiro
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ok Folks
I've tried but cannot reproduce this. The REG_CREATE_EX
failure is during a domain logon from Windows XP. The
client is trying to create
[System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\
DefaultUserConfiguration]
I can fix this,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
| ok Folks
|
| I've tried but cannot reproduce this. The REG_CREATE_EX
| failure is during a domain logon from Windows XP. The
| client is trying to create
|
| [System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\
|
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
ok. Can you folks try out the patch at
http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/regcreatekey_v1.patch
and let me know if that fixes the usrmgr.exe failures
you are seeing? It should at least fix the REG_CREATE_KEY_EX
failures in the logs.
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bork wrote:
| Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
|
| ok. Can you folks try out the patch at
| http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/regcreatekey_v1.patch
| and let me know if that fixes the usrmgr.exe failures
| you are seeing? It should at least fix
: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 1 de Setembro de 2005 14:18
To: Bruno Guerreiro; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE doesn't work anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerald (Jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Guerreiro wrote:
| I started by getting to the point where users and
| local groups were listed. Then a Stub received bad
| data message appeared. Tried net rpc groupmap list
| and net rpc group It worked.
| Tried usermanager again, no errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
i had doubled checked any procedure with usrmgr
with smb pdc ldap on suse 9.3 latest stable samba version 3.20 from suse
so i have no failures with create user, delete user,
create groups, delete Groups, and add/del users to group
so i am
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
failure error though. I've also gone ahead and added
the registry key to the Samba's registry.tdb file in
the patch posted at http://www.samba.org/samba/patches/
The only error message in the samba logs while joining the 3.0.20 samba
domain with XP SP2 is now:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Schetterer wrote:
| Hi Folks,
|
| i had doubled checked any procedure with usrmgr
| with smb pdc ldap on suse 9.3 latest stable samba version 3.20 from suse
| so i have no failures with create user, delete user,
| create groups, delete Groups,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bork wrote:
| Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
|
| failure error though. I've also gone ahead and added
| the registry key to the Samba's registry.tdb file in
| the patch posted at http://www.samba.org/samba/patches/
|
| The only error message in
Hi,
my test system is a w2k server. my server is a SLES8 with Samba 3.0.20
(I get it from ftp.sernet.de).
I've tried to start srvmgr: same result!
it says: «Il servizio Server non è avviato» - I can translate in: «The
service Server is not start».
There are some strange randoms errors on smbd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| Hi,
|
| my test system is a w2k server. my server is a SLES8 with Samba 3.0.20
| (I get it from ftp.sernet.de).
|
| I've tried to start srvmgr: same result!
|
| it says: «Il servizio Server non è avviato» - I can translate
I've upgraded my system at Samba 3.0.20 (SLES 8) bacause of some errors
on winbind and Windows 2003.
Now, usrmgr.exe doesn't work anymore.
It reports: «procedure number is out of range - Do you want to
administrate another domain?»
USRMGR has been working for 3 years; I've made all upgrades on
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:49:13PM +0200, Umberto Zanatta wrote:
I've upgraded my system at Samba 3.0.20 (SLES 8) bacause of some errors
on winbind and Windows 2003.
Now, usrmgr.exe doesn't work anymore.
It reports: «procedure number is out of range - Do you want to
administrate another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| I've upgraded my system at Samba 3.0.20 (SLES 8) bacause
| of some errors on winbind and Windows 2003.
| Now, usrmgr.exe doesn't work anymore.
|
| It reports: «procedure number is out of range - Do you want to
| administrate
This is the log about usrmgr.
Aug 31 18:26:55 provtvlp smbd[17237]: [2005/08/31 18:26:55, 0,
effective(0, 512), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(533)
Aug 31 18:26:55 provtvlp smbd[17237]: prs_mem_get: reading data of
size 4 would overrun buffer.
Aug 31 18:26:55 provtvlp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Umberto Zanatta wrote:
| This is the log about usrmgr.
|
|
| Aug 31 18:26:55 provtvlp smbd[17237]: [2005/08/31 18:26:55, 0,
| effective(0, 512), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(533)
| Aug 31 18:26:55 provtvlp smbd[17237]: prs_mem_get:
Hello!
Jerry you are right about script and permissions!
I'm looking again to usrmgr.exe and has corrected most of the problems
of which I spoke earlier
This patch is corrected most problems, but i can't fixed, current
moment, problems where not root create global group ... sorry :(
This patch
Hi to everybody.
I'm using samba 3.0.6 as PDC and everything is ok. I'm now trying to
use some windows managing tool, as USRMGR to add user and group, but
I'm finding some problem, in particular about some of the user
configuration detail that I can't set. I've read that there is an
usefull tool
Hi!
I can use this legacy tool fine to display/modify user information on W2K
workstations.
Double click a user on W2K Server gives procedure out of range
Any idea?
Environment is Samba 3.0.4 / LDAP.
DB
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Joseph Doran schrieb:
Hi,
Sorry if I am stating the obvious, but I could not find any info anywhere
about this issue.
Just a quick email to alert people to the fact that some posts that I have
been scouring over suggest that certain individuals are unable to add
users through usrmgr.exe. I have
Hi Robert,
I am running Version 3.0.2a. I did not add the version number as I would
have thought that it would affect any version that uses passwd chat.
Regards
Joe.
Joseph Doran schrieb:
Hi,
Sorry if I am stating the obvious, but I could not find any info
anywhere
about this issue.
Hi,
Sorry if I am stating the obvious, but I could not find any info anywhere
about this issue.
Just a quick email to alert people to the fact that some posts that I have
been scouring over suggest that certain individuals are unable to add
users through usrmgr.exe. I have spent the last 4~5
Hello,
I'm using Samba 3.0.1 with LDAP backend running as a PDC here. When I
start up usrmgr.exe from Windows NT, it will read all the users (or
computers, for srvmgr.exe) in the domain and report them back correctly.
However, whomever I am logged in as ( including gid 512 users) it will not
_
/
| /usr/local/samba/bin/mygroupadd
\_
/
| #!/bin/bash
|
| # Add the group using normal system groupadd tool.
|
Was it my fault, of course.
passwd program = /bin/passwd
was wrong. Right is
passwd program = /bin/passwd %u
Passwd chat:
passwd chat = *ew*password* %n\n *ew*password* %n\n
I can add users, add groups, delete users, delete groups,... :)
My backend is tdbsam.
How did I find it? Was reading
Hello
Tried to add user in user manager from domains, NT4.0 client, logged in as root
on the NT client. Clicked New User, filled in nick, description, full name,
password1, password2 (was dead sure they were the same, carefully typed 9-chars
long stupid passwd). The user wasn't in the database.
Thanks,
server schannel = Yes
^
This is the key. After setting this (on samba-3.0.1pre3), usrmgr.exe
started to partially work.
samba-3.0.1pre3 usrmgr.exe:
Works: Browsing users properties
Change of user's description
Browsing groups
Seems to work: Moving
Hello
Is here anybody who is able to manage his NT4.0 domain on hid Samba 3
PDC with User Manager for Domains?
Can you please tell me what things must be checked to be sure USRMGR.EXE
administration (User Manager for Domains aka Domain User Manager) works?
I am unable to make it working and
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE
Hello
Is here anybody who is able to manage his NT4.0 domain on hid Samba 3
PDC with User Manager for Domains?
Can you please tell me what things must be checked to be sure USRMGR.EXE
I try to admin Samba 3.0.0 and 3.0.1pre3 (tried both versions) NT4.0
PDC with NT4.0 machine and NT4.0 USRMGR.EXE and get persistent error
message
1) The group name could not be found
2) The user name could not be found
3) The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
Loggin
3.0.1pre3 has failures with usmgr
- Original Message -
From: Karel Kulhavý [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: [Samba] USRMGR.EXE administration: invalid syntax error message
I try to admin Samba 3.0.0 and 3.0.1pre3 (tried both
63 matches
Mail list logo
