Dear all,
Im testing samba4 and replacing the [nelogon] directory:
What I have done yet:
Deleted the original scripts directory from
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/my.domain/scripts
Set a link to a new place : ln -s /mnt/glusterfs/ads/scripts
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/my.domain/
When I
: Samba Version 4.0.7 replace netlogon:
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/my.domain/scripts
Dear all,
Im testing samba4 and replacing the [nelogon] directory:
What I have done yet:
Deleted the original scripts directory from
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/my.domain/scripts
Set a link to a new
Hallo, Daniel,
Du meintest am 22.08.13:
I did fix this:
In [global]
Set:
follow symlinks = yes
wide links = yes
unix extensions = no
As with Samba 3
I wouldn't set follow symlinks = yes as a global option ...
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von hul...@t-online.de
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. August 2013 15:59
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba Version 4.0.7 replace netlogon:
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/my.domain/scripts
Hallo, Daniel
Hi All,
Need help regarding the samba version samba-3.0.33-3.37.el5.x86_64
1) In the samba version (samba-3.0.33-3.37.el5.x86_64) that we are
planning to use , if we put multiple password server names like the one shown
below
workgroup = EUROPE - we do
Hello Prasanjit,
Am 18.06.2013 23:45, schrieb Shome, Prasanjit (TCS):
Hi All,
Need help regarding the samba version samba-3.0.33-3.37.el5.x86_64
1) In the samba version (samba-3.0.33-3.37.el5.x86_64) that we are
planning to use , if we put multiple password server names like
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Is there a way to determine (or at least get close) what version of
Samba an embedded client may be running (or based on) via packet
sniffing (tcpdump, wireshark)?
If they have not changed the version string to obscure
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Richard Sharpe
realrichardsha...@gmail.com wrote:
If they have not changed the version string to obscure the version,
then the following will work:
cc1# smbclient //some-node/some-share
After removing all existing Samba folders, I downloaded,compiled, and
provisioned Samba 4.0.5 under Ubuntu 12.04 desktop. But when I check for
version (samba V or samba version), samba responds with ³Version
4.0.0alpha18² Am I missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Am 11.04.2013 23:30, schrieb Bill Wilken:
After removing all existing Samba folders, I downloaded,compiled, and
provisioned Samba 4.0.5 under Ubuntu 12.04 desktop. But when I check for
version (samba V or samba ‹version), samba responds with ³Version
4.0.0alpha18² Am I missing something?
I
Muehlfeld sa...@marc-muehlfeld.de wrote:
Am 11.04.2013 23:30, schrieb Bill Wilken:
After removing all existing Samba folders, I downloaded,compiled, and
provisioned Samba 4.0.5 under Ubuntu 12.04 desktop. But when I check for
version (samba V or samba ‹version), samba responds with ³Version
all existing Samba folders, I downloaded,compiled, and
provisioned Samba 4.0.5 under Ubuntu 12.04 desktop. But when I check
for
version (samba V or samba ‹version), samba responds with ³Version
4.0.0alpha18² Am I missing something?
I don't know Ubuntu. But I guess your distribution
Is there a way to determine (or at least get close) what version of
Samba an embedded client may be running (or based on) via packet
sniffing (tcpdump, wireshark)?
Thanks.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Richard Sharpe
realrichardsha...@gmail.com wrote:
If they have not changed the version string to obscure the version,
then the following will work:
cc1# smbclient //some-node/some-share -U[some-dom/]some-user%some-password
Failed to load upcase.dat, will use
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
==
Native OS: Linux version 2.6.35
Native LAN Manager: CIFS VFS Client for Linux
==
It advertises these protocols:
===
/dns_update.c:294: Failed DNS update -
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED^C
Did you manage to resolve this issue?
I am encountering the same problem with FreeBSD9
amd64 and Samba Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-99efe84,
and so far have found no solutions.
--
To unsubscribe
/samba/private/krb5.conf /etc
root@f10:/usr/local/samba/sbin # ./samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: Traceback (most recent call last):
/usr
to /etc after I run
samba-tool domain provision.
root@f10:/usr/local/samba/sbin # ./samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: Traceback (most recent
to /etc after I run
samba-tool domain provision.
root@f10:/usr/local/samba/sbin # ./samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: Traceback (most
copied krb5.conf from /usr/local/samba/private to /etc after I run
samba-tool domain provision.
root@f10:/usr/local/samba/sbin # ./samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
/usr/local/samba
krb5.conf from /usr/local/samba/private to /etc after I run
samba-tool domain provision.
root@f10:/usr/local/samba/sbin # ./samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
samba: using 'single' process model
/usr/local/samba/sbin
: [Samba] Samba4 in FreeBSD 9 i386 for Domain controller not
working. Samba version 4.1.0 pre1-GIT cf15406
On 19/11/12 02:50, Pccom Frank wrote:
Thank you Andrew!
You are right. Let FreeBSD start its own Kerberos does not make sense since
Samba4 has its own Kerberos.
I can not get Samba4's
On 19/11/12 18:46, pccom frank wrote:
Hi,Rowland!
Thank you for your help.
Change the dns server to the samba server make things better. But
still not working.
root@f10:/etc # /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell
On 19/11/12 19:15, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 19/11/12 18:46, pccom frank wrote:
Hi,Rowland!
Thank you for your help.
Change the dns server to the samba server make things better. But
still not working.
root@f10:/etc # /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba -i -M single
samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-e6a100e
Hi, I have deinstalled bind99 and re-made Samba4But still, Samba4 not
working.The following are what I did.Looks like it is the dnsupdate problem.
This time, it is the samba4's dnsupdate problem.
Do I have to initialize kdc server?
Those are copied from FreeBSD handbook for Kerberos 5.
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 16:42 -0500, Pccom Frank wrote:
Hi, Samab gurus!
I tried to make Samba4 work on FreeBSD 9.1 i386 but failed to join an XP
computer to the domain.
What I did is:
1, git clone git://git.samba.org/samba.git samba-master
2, cd /usr/local/samba-master
3, ./configure
Hi, Samab gurus!
I tried to make Samba4 work on FreeBSD 9.1 i386 but failed to join an XP
computer to the domain.
What I did is:
1, git clone git://git.samba.org/samba.git samba-master
2, cd /usr/local/samba-master
3, ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest make make install
4,
thanks, look
/usr/local/samba/bin# ./smbclient -V
Version 4.0.0alpha20-GIT-d38a171
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
After sucessfull install I got a provision error:
version 'SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_DEVELOPERBUILD' not found
1. Download samba4 with git
o.k
2. ./configure.developer --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfigdir=/etc
--localstatedir=/var
o.k
3. make
o.k
4. make install
o.k
5.
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 14:25 +0100, Joseph Kuehner wrote:
After sucessfull install I got a provision error:
version 'SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_DEVELOPERBUILD' not found
1. Download samba4 with git
o.k
2. ./configure.developer --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfigdir=/etc
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for the information. Appreciate it!
Best Regards,
Mandy Lee
-Original Message-
From: frew...@gmail.com [mailto:frew...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Pavel Plesov
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:17 PM
To: Lee, Set Wan
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba
You should use Samba 3.5+ to operate correctly with AD2008. No sure
about 3.4, but versions 3.0 - 3.3 are not compatible with AD2008 when
serving clients in security = ads mode.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:40, Lee, Set Wan set-wan@hp.com wrote:
Hi Team,
I would like to verify if the Samba
Hi Team,
I would like to verify if the Samba 3.0.22 is compatible with AD2008.
We have a pretty old server that we are not able to update to 3.0.32 version
and above as I was informed we must have it upgraded.
Does Samba 3.0.22 is compatible with AD2008?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Mandy
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:40:02AM +, Lee, Set Wan wrote:
Hi Team,
I would like to verify if the Samba 3.0.22 is compatible with AD2008.
We have a pretty old server that we are not able to update to 3.0.32 version
and above as I was informed we must have it upgraded.
Does Samba
Hi all,
after update to Samba version 3.5.8-SerNet-Debian, I've got the
following errors, when I try to connect to the share via smbclient:
Domain=[ESERVICE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.8-SerNet-Debian]
Server not using user level security and no password supplied.
tree connect failed
From: Ben Arthur ben.art...@ints.com
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:44 -0700
I was wondering if anyone knew if Samba version 2.2.3a ran on Red Hat 7.3
will work with Windows 7.
As far as I tried to connect to Samba 2.2.3a on Debian sarge from
Windows 7 RTM 64bit with LMCompatibilityLevel 2, I
From: Ben Arthur ben.art...@ints.com
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:12:44 -0700
The error was simply username and or password was not correct even though we
have confirmed it to be correct and working when connected with XP. Sounds
like I need to see if their is a Samba version 3.2.12 or higher
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knew if Samba version 2.2.3a ran on Red Hat 7.3
will work with Windows 7. Currently even after editing the registry on the
Windows system, I am able to connect but not log in. If you think that it
will not work, is there a version of Samba that will work
I was wondering if anyone knew if Samba version 2.2.3a ran on Red Hat 7.3
will work with Windows 7. Currently even after editing the registry on the
Windows system, I am able to connect but not log in. If you think that it
will not work, is there a version of Samba that will work
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:03:44AM -0700, Ben Arthur wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knew if Samba version 2.2.3a ran on Red Hat 7.3
will work with Windows 7. Currently even after editing the registry on the
Windows system, I am able to connect but not log in. If you think
Thanks John,
I had seen that but I did not get the error that it mentioned, so I was
wondering if something had changed. Thanks for your help!
Ben Arthur
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:16 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.comwrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew if Samba version 2.2.3a ran
Dear all
I have samba+ldap setup,act as Domain server on Rhel 5.0 with samba
version 3.0.28. Windows 7 machines are not joining this domain. I think
i need to upgrade samba. What samba version is stable with windows 7?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
I have samba+ldap setup,act as Domain server on Rhel 5.0 with samba
version 3.0.28. Windows 7 machines are not joining this domain. I think
i need to upgrade samba. What samba version is stable with windows 7?
I would say 3.5.6 is the best but you can get away with using 3.3.X versions
2011/1/10 John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com:
I have samba+ldap setup,act as Domain server on Rhel 5.0 with samba
version 3.0.28. Windows 7 machines are not joining this domain. I think
i need to upgrade samba. What samba version is stable with windows 7?
I would say 3.5.6 is the best
me
Thanks
On 1/9/11, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
I have samba+ldap setup,act as Domain server on Rhel 5.0 with samba
version 3.0.28. Windows 7 machines are not joining this domain. I think
i need to upgrade samba. What samba version is stable with windows 7?
I would say 3.5.6
I see via yum that there is samba and there is samba3x available for CentOS
(my boxes are hooked to the main CentOS repo, Fedora EPEL, and RPMFORGE).
'samba' is 3.0.33
'samba3x' is 3.3.8
Is there any down-side to upgrading to 'samba3x' and running 3.3.8 instead of
3.0.33? I'm
If you want Windows 7 support, you need Samba 3.3.x.
Which Fedora repo? I found that FC6 RPM's usually installed OK on
RedHat RHEL5.x but anything above was likely to need a newer glibc or
libc (or something like that.)
On 09/28/2010 04:23 PM, scott_st...@trendmicro.com wrote:
I see
1:37 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba version to use on CentOS?
If you want Windows 7 support, you need Samba 3.3.x.
Which Fedora repo? I found that FC6 RPM's usually installed OK on
RedHat RHEL5.x but anything above was likely to need a newer glibc or
libc (or something
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, scott_st...@trendmicro.com wrote:
it's Fedora EPEL which is the enterprise repository.. ie, Fedora packages
specifically ported to work on CentOS. It used to be part of the fedora
mirror but now it's its own thing, at least on mirrors.kernel.org. Turns
-auth ||
echo)
#a total hack - I don't know rpm better :-(
%define rhV %(awk '{print $3}' /etc/redhat-release|grep -c ^4)
Summary: Samba SMB client and server
Vendor: Samba Team
Packager: Samba Team sa...@samba.org
Name: samba
Version: 3.5.5
Release: 1
Epoch:0
License: GNU
I have setup a Centos5.5 VMWare guest with Samba and Winbind for Active
Directory integration, using GUI tools.
Authentication works flawlessly, with automatic home directory creation.
What I want to achieve now is using local UNIX groups to controll access to
shared folders.
smb.conf global
Hello,
I am looking for Samba versions which are compatible with AIX and Solaris
different versions.
1. AIX 4.3.3
2. AIX 5.1
3. AIX 5.2
4. AIX 5.3
5. AIX 6.1
6. Solaris 8
7. Solaris 9
8. Solaris 10
Thanks in Advance.
Ganesh N Johari
ITO-DCS-UNIX.
MPHASIS an HP company.
Email:-
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 06:28:38PM +0100, csirt wrote:
Now i am confused about the different tribes 3.3x, 3.4x. 3.5x of samba.
I could not find something about it on samba.org.
Which one i should go for ? What are the major-differences between the
three?
please see
Karolin,
thank you very much! That's exactly the information i have been looking for.
cheers
2010/3/17 Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 06:28:38PM +0100, csirt wrote:
Now i am confused about the different tribes 3.3x, 3.4x. 3.5x of samba.
I could not find
Hi,
which version of Samba do i need, when i want to run Win 7 Clients ?
At the moment i am running Samba version 3.0.28a with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS.
regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, csirt wrote:
Hi,
which version of Samba do i need, when i want to run Win 7 Clients ?
At the moment i am running Samba version 3.0.28a with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 suggests you will need a Samba
3.4 or 3.3 version; 3.4.0 and 3.3.7
David,
thank you! Silly enough i wrote the page, only recognising the registry
hacks not the required Samba version.
Are there any pitfalls while upgrading from 3.0.x to 3.3 or above? Which is
the recommende Version i should upgrade to?
regards
2010/3/16 David Adam zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
On 03/16/2010 03:19 AM, csirt wrote:
David,
thank you! Silly enough i wrote the page, only recognising the registry
hacks not the required Samba version.
Are there any pitfalls while upgrading from 3.0.x to 3.3 or above? Which is
the recommende Version i should upgrade to?
regards
2010/3/16
2010/3/16 Zaeem Arshad zaeem.ars...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:49 AM, csirt csirt...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
which version of Samba do i need, when i want to run Win 7 Clients ?
At the moment i am running Samba version 3.0.28a with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS.
regards
I am using
Samba version 3.0.28a with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS.
regards
I am using 3.4.3-41 without any issues.
--
Zaeem
Hi,
Now i am confused about the different tribes 3.3x, 3.4x. 3.5x of samba.
I could not find something about it on samba.org.
Which one i should go for ? What are the major-differences
csirt-3 wrote:
Hi,
which version of Samba do i need, when i want to run Win 7 Clients ?
At the moment i am running Samba version 3.0.28a with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS.
regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
Am Mittwoch 03 Februar 2010 03:52:43 schrieb Günter Kukkukk:
Am Dienstag 02 Februar 2010 23:56:06 schrieb James Hurlburt:
Sirs:
I have a Ubuntu 6.06 samba 3.0.22 file server running on linux.
I am attempting to update the file server to ubuntu 8.10, samba 3.2.3.
I have been attempting
Am Dienstag 02 Februar 2010 23:56:06 schrieb James Hurlburt:
Sirs:
I have a Ubuntu 6.06 samba 3.0.22 file server running on linux.
I am attempting to update the file server to ubuntu 8.10, samba 3.2.3.
I have been attempting this, intermittently, for some time which is why
8.10.
I
Hello,
Please see the debian bts for details:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563729
I thought that this bug might be interesting for many people so I
decided to post it here.
greets Jimmy
--
Andreas Jimmy Gredler
,'`. http://www.jimmy.co.at/ |
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people on the forum using with Samba?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:55 AM, jamrocknews_jamr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people on the forum using with Samba?
At work I am using
i'm running 2.4.12 on a fedora 10 server at work, and 2.4.15 on fedora
11 server at home, both work great.
jamrock wrote:
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people
Any version of OpenLDAP should work, in fact any LDAP server should
work(SunONE, Tivoli, Fedora), OpenLDAP is required for smbk5pwd however.
If you want to do replication you should probably use OpenLDAP 2.4.17, it
has a lot of fixes in this area, its not that hard to compile from scratch.
On
jamrock news_jamr...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:h4pdri$c9...@ger.gmane.org...
I have been using an old version of OpenLDAP on my Samba servers. I am
setting up a new server and want to use a more recent version.
What versions of OpenLDAP are people on the forum using with Samba?
--
I can't open a file (on our samba server) using Software called Actis,
When I troubleshoot the problem using Wireshark, I saw SMB protocol
using FIND_FIRST2 and filename using obscure Windows metacharacters,
e.g.
USAARG03VA.SWK
Which gives STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE (Samba is interpreting the
I can't open a file (on our samba server) using Actis,
When I troubleshoot the problem using Wireshark, see SMB protocol using
FIND_FIRST2 and filename using obscure Windows metacharacters, e.g.
USAARG03VA.SWK
, which gives STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE (Samba is interpreting the name
literally)
On 8/15/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've seen lots of printer problems in the 3.2.x branch and we print about
1.5 Mil. Pages a month, so printing must work ok for me.
These are supposedly all fixed in the upcoming 3.2.2, so you might want
to wait for that.
Any recent
I recently installed Fedora 9 for use as a squid server. We use smb_auth
basic authorization and have run into a problem with it. I believe that I
have tracked the problem down to smbclient when the USER environmental
variable contains the userid and password. smb_auth.sh in squid uses the
USER
I recently installed Fedora 9 for use as a squid server. We use smb_auth
basic authorization and have run into a problem with it. I believe that I
have tracked the problem down to smbclient when the USER environmental
variable contains the userid and password. smb_auth.sh in squid uses the
USER
I'm currently investigating an issue like this - basically, a customer
of ours is using Vista SP1, and transferring large files. The
transfer is interrupted - the interruptions appear to correlate to
these entries in samba.log:
sloisn01-1: [2008/01/14 16:33:46, 0, pid=77015, effective(0,
Yesterday i installed then new SP1 RC for Microsoft Vista Enterprise,
Since then I cant connect to our samba server any more.
Samba is configured as ad member, with winbind and idmap backend = rid.
Has anyone the same Problem ?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Michael Mössler
uhb
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:40:38PM +0100, Hans Mayer wrote:
dear samba-gurus
our environment: solaris 9 - samba 3.0.27a
after debugging a lot of hours we have to notice, that
password change does not work in version 3.0.27a
any more on solaris boxes.
same smb.config on 3.0.24 and
I am running samba in environment. Need to know the version of samba I
am running.
Regards,
Tito Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
: Sunday, December 16, 2007 7:27 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] samba version
I am running samba in environment. Need to know the version of samba I
am running.
Regards,
Tito Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
At 07:27 PM Sunday, 12/16/2007, Tito Ray wrote -=
I am running samba in environment. Need to know the version of samba I
am running.
$smbstatus -V
$smbclient -V
There are more but either of those will give you the version...
HTH -
Ed
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Randomly Generated
dear samba-gurus
our environment: solaris 9 - samba 3.0.27a
after debugging a lot of hours we have to notice, that
password change does not work in version 3.0.27a
any more on solaris boxes.
same smb.config on 3.0.24 and 3.0.27a, but
unix password sync ist not working with 27a
with
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bai, Junmin
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:30 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] what is the recommended samba version on solaris?
Guys
I was so frustrated about installing samba with ADS and winbind support
on solaris 8.
After
Of Eric Diven
Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2007 1:17 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] what is the recommended samba version on solaris?
I'm using 3.0.23d on Solaris 10 successfully. I was using 3.0.24 and
3.0.25[x] but was having ACL related problems with them. I never had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bai, Junmin wrote:
Guys
I was so frustrated about installing samba with ADS and winbind support
on solaris 8.
Just a guess, what version Kerberos are you running on solaris 8?
Latest version of Kerberos for solaris is 5 something.
.
After the machine is started, the
whole directory test is gone.
I am using samba3.0.26a with ads and winbind on solaris 8. Is it a bug
with this version?
Could anybody recommend a samba version for solaris 8.
Thanks
Junmin
-Original Message-
From: Bai, Junmin
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November
Quoting Volker Lendecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:24:07PM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
I have an issue with Samba version 3.0.25b on Debian. I am receiving a
number of mails from my server with the following:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:24:07PM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
I have an issue with Samba version 3.0.25b on Debian. I am receiving a
number of mails from my server with the following:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 18483 ().
We need
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:24:07PM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
I have an issue with Samba version 3.0.25b on Debian. I am receiving a
number of mails from my server with the following:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 18483 ().
We
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 09:12:58AM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Here is the backtrace info from the log file:
--
[2007/08/08 08:49:54, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(1033)
ian (192.168.1.35) connect to service shared initially as user ianlang
(uid=1005, gid=106)
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 09:12:58AM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Here is the backtrace info from the log file:
--
[2007/08/08 08:49:54, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(1033)
ian (192.168.1.35) connect to service shared initially as user ianlang
(uid=1005,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
It is OK, there is a lot of space left on the disk.
The next most likely reason is that you locking.tdb is
indeed corrupt. reiserfs? Does it become better if you shut
down smbd, delete it and restart smbd?
Voler
pgp1zPKVo8eOf.pgp
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Dan Peachey wrote:
It is OK, there is a lot of space left on the disk.
The next most likely reason is that you locking.tdb is
indeed corrupt. reiserfs? Does it become better if you shut
down smbd, delete it and restart smbd?
Voler
I'm using
Hi,
I have an issue with Samba version 3.0.25b on Debian. I am receiving a
number of mails from my server with the following:
The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
was called for PID 18483 ().
This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault
Hello List members,
i have a strange problem with my new Samba Server. It is the Version
3.0.23d.
I have configured a share in which i want all users of a certain group
be able to write in.
This is the Configuration:
[Agents]
comment = Gemeinsames Laufwerk
browseable = yes
path =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dennis Schwan wrote, On 08-08-2007 06:00:
[Agents]
comment = Gemeinsames Laufwerk
browseable = yes
path = /samba/public
writeable = yes
write list = @agents, sonja, administrator, engesser, atzler
admin users = administrator
Hello,
We are running Samba Version 3.0.22-13.30-1290-SUSE-SLES10 on an iSeries
LPAR with 512 memory and .10 of the processor and a GB NIC. I have
successfully joined this server to our Windows 2000 active directory. I
have copied over some data and setup some test shares and mapped
Hello,
We are running Samba Version 3.0.22-13.30-1290-SUSE-SLES10 on an iSeries
LPAR with 512 memory and .10 of the processor and a GB NIC. I have
successfully joined this server to our Windows 2000 active directory. I
have copied over some data and setup some test shares and mapped
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:42:35AM -0400, Will Holmes wrote:
I noticed that when I opened the file on the server the smbd process takes
80% of the CPU until the file is opened.
What is smbd doing at this point? strace -p pid might
shed some light on that.
Volker
pgpx4WuXBVDh3.pgp
to try out your configuration on 3.0.24 or higher?
Will Holmes wrote:
Hello,
We are running Samba Version 3.0.22-13.30-1290-SUSE-SLES10 on an iSeries
LPAR with 512 memory and .10 of the processor and a GB NIC. I have
successfully joined this server to our Windows 2000 active directory. I
files on Samba Version 3.0.22
(UPDATED)
Other people (me included) have seen that. Now that I've moved us to
3.0.24 (Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Server), I'm not seeing that kind of
behavior. I can't be completely sure if it was the upgrade or some
changes to my smb.conf required by the upgrade that did
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
