Hi,
if I connect from a winxp machine to my samba share and create a new
file, it does not get the permissions specified by create mask and
force create mode at first. Only after I modify the permissions on the
client, the file finally gets the right permissions on the server.
Thereby it
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:52:20AM +0200, Thijs van der Kraan wrote:
The parameters 'force create mode' and 'force directory mode' have no effect
when the option 'unix extensions' is active. The documentation does not
report any interaction between the unix extensions and the forced
The parameters 'force create mode' and 'force directory mode' have no effect
when the option 'unix extensions' is active. The documentation does not report
any interaction between the unix extensions and the forced modes, so I'm
assuming it's a bug.I'd like to know if it is a known bug ?Has
My Samba v3.0.25b (in CentOS v5.1) has the smb.conf shown below. What
I'm seeing is that force create mode is not enforced when accessed by
a Linux CIFS client (Fedora 7).
On the server, user steve has a home directory of /home/steve, and the public
directory is /home/samba/public.
The shares
... as in they dont appear to be forcing anymore anymore ? =)
I've tried on two seperate machines, slightly different configs but same
statements in the stanza I was testing...
Trying to force 750/640 and it appeared to work quite nicely in the
past.. No other mode statements around, and
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
christopher pickert
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 3:57 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] force create mode / force directory mode in 3.0.13
behaviorchanged?
... as in they dont appear to be forcing anymore anymore ? =) I've tried on
two seperate
- Original Message - From: Patrick DUBAU
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] force create mode
This is an update.
I found for question 2. Just putforce group = group name or
set the setgid bit on the root directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick DUBAU wrote:
| But when i put force create mode = 0034 i get rwx rwx r--
| instead of rwx rwx --- !! Where is the mistake?
The force create mode is a bitwise OR So you are
including the o+r bit. if you want all files to be
rwx rwx ---,
in your smb.conf.
force create mode = 0770
Greetz Bart
- Original Message - From: Patrick DUBAU
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] force create mode
This is an update.
I found for question 2. Just putforce group = group
On Jan 11, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Patrick McSwiggen wrote:
So if you don't want the o+r bit set use:
create mask 0770
If you now want to force ug+rwx permissions for all files, *also* use:
force create mode 0770
and I also left off the equal signs--make these:
create mask = 0770
force create mode
On Jan 11, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Patrick McSwiggen wrote:
So if you don't want the o+r bit set use:
create mask 0770
If you now want to force ug+rwx permissions for all files, *also* use:
force create mode 0770
and I also left off the equal signs--make these:
create mask = 0770
force create mode
This is an update.
I found for question 2. Just putforce group = group name or set
the setgid bit on the root directory of the share
But i still can't solve my first problem.
What do i have to do so that each file that a user creates has the
following rights rwx rwx --- ?
Were is the trick
Hi Patrick,
Try to use the following in your smb.conf.
force create mode = 0770
Greetz Bart
- Original Message -
From: Patrick DUBAU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] force create mode
This is an update.
I found
Dear List,
I'd like to report my observations on a Samba new file permissions problem
for which I found
dozens of support requests on the net without any useful replies.
Hopefully, my observations help identify the root cause of this issue which
also seems to occur
with new Samba versions 3.0.x.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:31:00AM +0200, Zounek, Alex, Patentanwaltskanzlei Zounek
wrote:
Dear List,
I'd like to report my observations on a Samba new file permissions problem
for which I found
dozens of support requests on the net without any useful replies.
Hopefully, my observations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] common]# rpm -q samba
samba-3.0.2-7.FC1
I have a share called common
[common]
comment = CrownAg Regina
browseable = yes
path = /home/common/
valid users = +crownag-users
writeable = yes
force create mode = 0660
force directory mode = 0770
common has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] common]# rpm -q samba
samba-3.0.2-7.FC1
I have a share called common
[common]
comment = CrownAg Regina
browseable = yes
path = /home/common/
valid users = +crownag-users
writeable = yes
force create mode = 0660
force directory mode = 0770
common has
17 matches
Mail list logo
