On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:36:03PM -0500, Craig Ham wrote:
Jeremy
So I've got Ubuntu and Samba server up and running.
I create a user in linux and on samba, both same username and password.
I get to a workstation and double click the server name, I enter the samba
username and password but
Our school needs to replace our Novell server.
We have a collection of XP Pro computers and a few XP Home, Win98, Win95
and Win2000 computers.
All we need is file sharing.
Can Samba be setup so that all these computers can access a file share (F:\
or G:\) and run the program on the client pc?
Our school needs to replace our Novell server.
We have a collection of XP Pro computers and a few XP Home, Win98, Win95
and Win2000 computers.
All we need is file sharing.
Can Samba be setup so that all these computers can access a file share (F:\
or G:\) and run the program on the client
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:47:34PM -0500, Craig Ham wrote:
Our school needs to replace our Novell server.
We have a collection of XP Pro computers and a few XP Home, Win98, Win95
and Win2000 computers.
All we need is file sharing.
Can Samba be setup so that all these computers can access a
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Conta Falsa 337
contafalsa...@gmail.com wrote:
I read http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html the
part regarding group or force group directive, and it's not clear to me
if I can have more than one instance of this directive, since I need
I read http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html the
part regarding group or force group directive, and it's not clear to me
if I can have more than one instance of this directive, since I need the
group to be forced depending on which share the user is creating the file.
An
samba version is 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7
--
I created users on both samba and the linux system, and created 3 groups on
the system. Each of these groups own a specific directory, the directory on
the filesystem belongs to root.groupfoo. On my smb.conf I gave each of these
groups write access to its
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Conta Falsa 337
contafalsa...@gmail.com wrote:
samba version is 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7
--
I created users on both samba and the linux system, and created 3 groups on
the system. Each of these groups own a specific directory, the directory on
the filesystem
Good news bad news: With the help of Richard Nelson, I was able
to generate a batch file, that will prompt for an username and
password in Windows XP:
The following batch file, disconnects J: (incase a user forgot to
logoff), then requests the username.
The * after the password will prompt
I have a small network running in a school. My network is
working. samba is running on openSuSE 11.0 and Windows XP and
Windows98se can access the non protect samba shares/sections.
I have one problem that I been struggling with. I have read the
howto's, and searched the lists, but can not
Hello everyone,
I am new to samba so after some trial, I got stuck with my setup, so I
decide to post here to look for your assist, so thank you first! and
below is my installation requirement:
I have 01 server ( running CentOS 5.2) and I will use it as file server
for 20 workstations that
Norberto Bensa wrote:
On Monday October 20 2008 06:47:27 Lunix1618 wrote:
I tried security = user and guest ok = yes in [global]
try removing that and add guest ok = Yes in [PUBLIC].
Norberto,
I success with anonymous access for PUBLIC, what I want is access
control on
On Monday October 20 2008 06:47:27 Lunix1618 wrote:
I tried security = user and guest ok = yes in [global]
try removing that and add guest ok = Yes in [PUBLIC].
Regards,
--
Norberto Bensa
Linux 2.6.27-gentoo Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
09:01:17 up 18:46, 1 user, load average:
Silly question actually. :)
Basically, if a Windows client can do it while connected to a Windows
server, they can do it while connected to a Samba server. This is a
basic permissions issue. If the client has permission to create a
directory on the share, it should work. The easiest way to
Thak you for your response. This may work well.
Do you know if thier is a version of SAMBA that works with SCO Unixware
7 ???I don't recall what is on that machine - I think in the past
someone tried to get SAMBA or some sort of filesharing to work and could
not.I have to get the
First some background -
We got an old, tired PII, 233 server running NT 4.0
We have a Compaq Proliant that is a quad 550 Xeon CPU, 4 GB, 320 GB of
HD, a tape drive etc. It formerly was an Oracle Server that had SCO
UnixWare 7 on it. Currently it is having a problem - bad controller
card,
Hi all,
I would like to access my RedHat Enterprise box which has Samba 3.0.9,
by mapping a network drive from WinXP and specifying the UNIX
account/password on the server. Is this possible? I can duplicate
account usernames/passwords into smbusers/smbpasswd, but doing this for
every user is
Hello,
i'm trying to implement a samba server in one of the branches of the
organization that i'm working for.
at the present i have a w2k3 pdc and dns with active directory wich
handles all the domain secrity policies as the user profiles, the
problem is that the branch is very far and the
javier rojas wrote:
no, i haven'tthanks...
any idea on the part 3?...:)
On 12/12/06, Gary Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On part 2, did you restart xinetd?
The error message state idmap uid range missing or invalid. I'd
suggest believing it and adding a uid range in your smb.conf. :)
Hello,
i know i'm a newbie, but here i go (help me lord), i just
installed/configured samba 3.0.23d on my suse 10.1, but i have a
couple of questions about what's on the manual
1- when trying to secure swat with ssl, i installed openssl, and then
generate the certificates, but when i try
On part 2, did you restart xinetd?
javier rojas wrote:
Hello,
i know i'm a newbie, but here i go (help me lord), i just
installed/configured samba 3.0.23d on my suse 10.1, but i have a
couple of questions about what's on the manual
1- when trying to secure swat with ssl, i installed
All,
I am setting up a SAMBA server on a Redhat 8 Linux box. I have gotten
it set up and can ping the server and do have SAMBA installed on the
machine. I have gotten SWAT set up and can access the SAMBA server on a
Windows PC on the network going through SWAT. But, I can't see the
SAMBA
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.168.1.108 (192.168.1.108)
# Date: 2006/06/21 15:11:08
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = MYWORKGROUP
netbios name = CYBORG
server string = Cyborg File Server
security = SHARE
passwd program =
Here is the rest, sorry...
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
smb.conf 38L, 893C
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = Yes
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
Erik Hertzel schrieb:
Here is the rest, sorry...
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
smb.conf 38L, 893C
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = Yes
I have never tried this without giving a path like
path
Your situtation seems close to mine awhile back.
I could only access the share using the ip address for the host.
After starting windbindd the samba server started showing up in the network
places/neighborhood.
I have not seen any documentation that states that windbind needs to be running
in
I recently joined a samba 3.0.22 server to AD. When I did the kinit,
the AD gave me a 24 hour ticket with a 1 week renewal. Setting -r and
-l to 365d did not change anything, the ticket still came back the same.
However, my question is in reguard to whether this is really even
needed? First, I
Hello,
I was wondering how this configuration could be accomplished with
in Linux/Samba. I'm running samaba 3/Gentoo/Linux 2.6. I have two
hard drives, each of them I'm sharing across my network. The problem
is each drive is shown as its own share. So drive 1 one is seen as
share 1 and drive 2 is
Dear Samba users,
I have just set up a home network consisting of two XP computers and a linux
box running FC4. The linux box is currently acting as my webserver. The
whole network lies behind a router (belkin) with a hardware firewall and
each of the computers are running software firewalls.
I'm trying to set up shares to a Windows 2003 server. I have the shares
visible and can do some things on them but I can't run the executables on
them. The executables are issuing an access() call from within the Cygwin
environment and it returns an ENOENT error. A look at the security for the
After a recent upgrade (details below) as many as 30 percent of our
returning users are having trouble mapping SAMBA shares of their home
directories on the terra server. Many report that the problem just
goes away. I've only been able to pin down a couple of them.
Here's what I see. User tries
Hi,
you have to options,
1.- Configure winbind
2.- Create local users and maps to them in smb.conf - username map
parameter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi
Ok so I have samba setup and started and I have successfully joined the
AD domain and can see the Linux server in
Microsoft Active Directory Users and Groups applet.
I can also log on and browse a server from the lnux server using:
kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] - where LAB.COM is the AD Domain
I ran into this problem all of a sudden out of nowhere..I boted several times and
it appeared to fix itself...windows XPbut it did notso I again hit the F8 when
rebootingand instead of trying to boot into the safe mode I rebooted into the
DEBUGGING MODEI don't know what
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Newbie question: Windows - Delayed write failed
I ran into this problem all of a sudden out of nowhere..I boted several
times and it appeared to fix itself...windows XPbut it did notso I
again hit
Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know. Is there a
how to that anyone can point me to.
Sorry for the basic question,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know. Is there a
how to that anyone can point me to.
The bad news is that, no, there is no way to give the fine-grained control
that NTFS has to most _stock_ 2.4.x kernels.
-Original Message-
From: Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyway to support NFTS security on linux. it might mean
compiling a new file system into the kernal? I don't know.
Is there a
how to that anyone can point me to.
It depends on what you mean by 'NTFS
Hi all,
I am planning to deploy a Samba PDC for centralised file and print services
serving a mostly windows 2000 pro client environment. My network configuration forces
me to have the Samba PDC on a particular subnet ( say 172.16.56.X) and I could have
my clients anywhere on the
I'm very new to the use of samba, I have samba 3.0 configured and running on
a slackware 9.1 machine. I have also configured and have running winbind,
but I'm confused on how the domain permissions gets set on the samba shares.
I have the smb.conf security = domain, and wbinfo successfully grabs
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Storment, Brandon wrote:
I'm very new to the use of samba, I have samba 3.0 configured and running on
a slackware 9.1 machine. I have also configured and have running winbind,
but I'm confused on how the domain permissions gets set on the samba shares.
I have the smb.conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joel Hammer írta:
| I run a small home network. The linux box supplies the gateway to the
| internet. It works very nicely. All the other boxes (windows and linux)
| sit masqueraded and protected by the linux gateway. This doesn't use
| samba.
|
| Joel
Hello,
I have not installed Samba yet but before I do I was wondering if it is
possible with Samba to share an internet connection with a Windows XP
computer. I want to use my computer running Redhat Linux 9.0 (with
Samba) as the dialup for the internet and the Windows XP to connect to
my
I run a small home network. The linux box supplies the gateway to the
internet. It works very nicely. All the other boxes (windows and linux)
sit masqueraded and protected by the linux gateway. This doesn't use
samba.
Joel
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:23:57PM -0700, John Pearson wrote:
Hello,
I
Hello Everyone.
I'm having an issue with getting Samba to work correctly and am hoping
someone out there may have some helpful advice. My company is a primairly a
MS house so I'm fairly new to the Linux world (tired of spending on the
other guy's software) and I've really had enjoyed my
if anyone has any ideas, they are greatly appreciated.
Set log level = 2 or 3 and take a look in /var/log/samba/log.* particularly
the log named like your laptop should be of some interest; that is
log.yourlapname.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
I get the intermittent error
Windows - Delayed write failed
when saving files on the Samba directory. This happens from both XP and
NT2000 clients. Has anyone come across this error before?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
I am new to Samba and not on the mailing list just
yet. Please respond to this account if you can.
Is there a port of samba for AIX 4.3.3 5.1 and 5.2 ?
If so what is the current release and where can I get
it from.
Thank you CJ
=
There are two major products to come out of Berkeley: LSD
Using SAMBA 2.2.8a on RedHat 9.0, built from source, not binary. smb/unix
sync is active. PAM authentication is active.
As root, I can use smbpasswd to change a user's samba password, but the user
cannot change it him or herself. When the attempt is made, the system
rejects the password change
I'm trying to create a binary package of the latest version of Samba for LRP
(Linux Router Project) and was wondering where I can find information on what
binaries and files have to be included. I'm only interested in using Samba as a
server and only need the essentials. Any info/help would be
:32:58
To: Bart
Subject: RE: [Samba]
newbie question
I think I have
done that. Is there a file I can go look at to confirm
this?
-Original
Message-From: Bart
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15
When I try to connect to the samba server I get the
following error:
\\server is not accessible.
You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the
administrator of this server to see if you have access permissions. No service
is operating at the destination
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 08:13, Jalene Joyner wrote:
When I try to connect to the samba server I get the following error:
\\server is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this
network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to see if
you have access permissions. No
Dear list members,
perhaps this is a very simple question, but after several hours of searching
and experimenting, I have no idea what to do.
Situation: I have a Linux machine (RH 8.0, mount.smbf version 2.2.7) and use
smbmount to import my home directory from a machine in another Unix-Network:
Thanks for the performance information John, I wasn't aware that optimising the
conf could make such a difference.
I guess my way of thinking - where I want to look at the original smb.conf file
and have it nicely readable is a bit impractical,
and maybe I will soon change that way of thinking,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the performance information John, I wasn't aware that
optimising the conf could make such a difference. I guess my way of
thinking - where I want to look at the original smb.conf file and have
it nicely readable is a bit impractical, and
So John, are you the SWAT guru for Samba?
I like the idea of having an expert for each area of Samba.
Just a thought - if you are looking for further feedback regarding SWAT,
you may want to post a message to the Samba forum on tek-tips website.
(goto www.tek-tips.comand search for forum
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can Samba be used as a complete replacement
12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 12:11:00PM -0500, Robert Adkins wrote:
Dave,
I believe that you should first ask what Windows 2000 Active Directory
features you must have
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Robert Adkins wrote:
John,
One thing that I would love to see in Swat would be an area
Robert,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. Your comments will be taking into
account as SWAT gets hacked up this week.
In particular I will make sure that SWAT will issue a warning about file
optimization. Good suggestion. I think you hit the sore spot right on the
head. It is the surprise
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
The Samba-Team wrote SWAT to opimise the smb.conf file for a reason. I
believe that a configuration file is a poor place for system
documentation, particularly if it can affect performance. This does not
affect small sites but those with hundreds of MS Windows PC clients will
notice a
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John, I don't actually use swat, so am not highly qualified to offer
suggestions. Anyway, here's my two cents. :-)
I would like to use a nice gui such as SWAT to manage my conf file,
but don't because I have heard that it changes the structure
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows
, November 23, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba newbie question...
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active
Directory server? I have some vague
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active Directory
server? I have some vague notion that this can be accomplished by using a combination
of OpenLDAP, Samba, MIT Kerberos, and the OpenAFS file system.
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active Directory
server? I have some vague notion that this can be accomplished by using a combination
of
Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active Directory
server? I have some vague notion that this can be accomplished by using a combination
of OpenLDAP, Samba, MIT Kerberos, and the OpenAFS file system. To say the least, the
descriptions I have found have been vague as
Hi -
I am trying to set up a samba server on our solaris 2.8 box, which is to
be used primarily for printing in the first instance.
My smb.conf file is as follows:
[global]
comment = Music Samba %v
server string = Music Samba %v (%h)
workgroup = MUSIC
netbios name = VIXEN
log
Title: Message
I'm trying to use a simplified version of the
online manual that you can viewat: http://members.rogers.com/freeballer/Downloads/samba-howto.pdf
My Lan Being:Downstairs (Samba/Linux Machine) 192.168.1.101Laptop 192.168.1.100Wacko 192.168.1.102
Everything was going good so far
Hi All,
I can set up sambaon a linux box in a
workgroup (interfacing between windows 2000 red hat 7.2). The problem
arises when I try and setup 2 or more samba servers each on a distinct linux box
within a single workgroup.
Can anyone help ? I have tried giving them
different netbios
Hello, all,
I am sure you have read this
question a million times, but I have not been able to resolve this
problem. I am setting up a Samba server as an NT Domain Controller.
So far, I have set the paramaters in smb.conf precisely as recommended in the
Feb. 2002 edition of Linux
]
Subject: [Samba] Newbie question
Hello, all,
I am sure you have read this question a million times, but I have not
been able to resolve this problem. I am setting up a Samba server as an NT
Domain Controller. So far, I have set the paramaters in smb.conf precisely
as recommended in the Feb
Hi group,
I just installed Linux RedHat 7.2 with samba.
I use the following conf file:
[global]
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
printing = lprng
dns proxy = no
security = share
encrypt passwords = yes
workgroup = KS
server string =
At 02:17 PM 5/16/02 +0200, Rob Westland wrote:
Hi group,
Hi.
I just installed Linux RedHat 7.2 with samba.
I use the following conf file:
[global]
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
printing = lprng
dns proxy = no
security = share
encrypt passwords =
Hi,
This may be well documented , but hey I can only ask.
I have just installed Samba 2.0.7.0 onto AIX 4.3.3, from the Bull freeware
site.
However, although I can connect to an exported share from NT4 useing use *
\\servername\sharename, which works just fine. I cannot get to connect to
the
Hello Mark,
Samba is currently at v2.2.4, and therefore 2.0.7 is so old, you may be
lucky to find someone who doesn't say install the latest version.
Sambe is Free Software, not just freeware, so you can get the source and
install it. www.samba.org
If you need any help (We're just round the
78 matches
Mail list logo
