I have change the broadcast ip (172.17.255.255) of the server.
now nmbd is working.
Thank you
kevin
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.comwrote:
It looks like you have are using a block of private class B's as a
contiguous CIDR range including
Hi
I have samba domain controller in my network. and recently I have changed
the netmask of the network. Then nmbd is not working
could you please help me to solve this issue
nmbd -i
nmbd version 3.5.6 started.
Copyright Andrew
Can you show the ifconfig -a output on your server (or whatever the
appropriate command for your OS .)
The bind failed on ... 255 suggests the IP of the server is set wrong.
On 07/31/13 05:17, Kevin Sha wrote:
Hi
I have samba domain controller in my network. and recently I have changed
the
It looks like you have are using a block of private class B's as a
contiguous CIDR range including 172.16.x.x and 172.17.x.x
I played around with the IP's using various on line subnet calculators
http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=172.16.30.4mask1=15mask2=
Address: 172.16.30.4
Netmask:
Hi,
I've set up a samba server as a primary domain member with AD auth.
Everything works pretty smoothly except that when you reboot the server
samba will not work.
AFTER REBOOT:
kfrank@tldapprovider003:~$ smbclient tldapprovider003\\base
Enter kfrank's password:
session setup failed:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Moray Henderson
moray.hender...@ict-software.org wrote:
CentOS 6.4 appears to have been shipped with a broken Samba 3.6. The new
NMBDSOCKETDIR option defaults to /var/nmbd, which of course is an invalid
directory and should not be created[1]. While
CentOS 6.4 appears to have been shipped with a broken Samba 3.6. The new
NMBDSOCKETDIR option defaults to /var/nmbd, which of course is an invalid
directory and should not be created[1]. While hopefully they can fix it
with an option to their configure script at build time, could Samba itself
Hi there all!
I tried to find a resolution for my issue but I was unfortuned.
After few days of working samba PDC disappeared from the browser list
and stopped to receive users. The last message in the log.nmbd is:
[2012/06/27 15:37:08, 0] nmbd/asyncdns.c:155(start_async_dns)
started
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:55:20PM +0300, Ander Punnar wrote:
On 19 April 2012 21:50, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What is the syscall above the recvfrom ?
There isn't any.
Only gazillion lines of recvfrom EAGAIN.
When it's in the middle of doing that, attach to nmbd using
gdb and
On 17 April 2012 20:19, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What does strace -p nmb-pid say ?
Today, strace showed lots of following:
recvfrom(13, 0x7fff7c027a00, 576, 0, 0x7fff7c027c40, 0x7fff7c0279dc) =
-1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
But in log.nmbd, there wasn't anything
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:03:35AM +0300, Ander Punnar wrote:
On 17 April 2012 20:19, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What does strace -p nmb-pid say ?
Today, strace showed lots of following:
recvfrom(13, 0x7fff7c027a00, 576, 0, 0x7fff7c027c40, 0x7fff7c0279dc) =
-1 EAGAIN (Resource
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:49:36AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:03:35AM +0300, Ander Punnar wrote:
On 17 April 2012 20:19, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What does strace -p nmb-pid say ?
Today, strace showed lots of following:
recvfrom(13,
On 19 April 2012 21:50, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What is the syscall above the recvfrom ?
There isn't any.
Only gazillion lines of recvfrom EAGAIN.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:56:52AM +0300, Ander Punnar wrote:
On 17 April 2012 20:19, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What does strace -p nmb-pid say ?
Nothing interesting:
http://pastebin.com/93HUQ0Tp
In nmbd log there are lots of following lines:
http://pastebin.com/ENhvFqdx
Hello.
I have Samba 3.6.4 with LDAP backend
with domain logons enabled.
Long time I was running 3.5.1? from
Debian Squeeze backports without any problems.
Few days ago I decided (after testing) to upgrade
to 3.6.4, also from Debian backports.
Next morning nobody could login
and nmbd was eating
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59:45AM +0300, Ander Punnar wrote:
Hello.
I have Samba 3.6.4 with LDAP backend
with domain logons enabled.
Long time I was running 3.5.1? from
Debian Squeeze backports without any problems.
Few days ago I decided (after testing) to upgrade
to 3.6.4, also
On 17 April 2012 20:19, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
What does strace -p nmb-pid say ?
Nothing interesting:
http://pastebin.com/93HUQ0Tp
In nmbd log there are lots of following lines:
http://pastebin.com/ENhvFqdx
Looks like lots of machines ask about WPAD.
But then I noticed following
On 02/09/2012 06:14 AM, Huang, Hai Qing SLC CIT CMP SHA wrote:
Hello,
Our OS is AIX 6100-06-05-1115 and SAMBA version is 3.3.12.0
We have two network interfaces with different IPs. Now we restrict SAMBA
active in onf of the interface. SWAT and smbd can start. But nmbd and winbindd
Hello,
Our OS is AIX 6100-06-05-1115 and SAMBA version is 3.3.12.0
We have two network interfaces with different IPs. Now we restrict SAMBA
active in onf of the interface. SWAT and smbd can start. But nmbd and winbindd
processes can't start. And there is below warning info in log.nmbd and
Hello,
I have lots of the following entries in my log:
nmbd[1605]: [2010/05/28 09:59:51, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1375)
nmbd[1605]: validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet:
Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
What does this mean exactly? Can I
On 2/14/10 10:05 PM, Paul Venzke wrote:
Robert;
nmbd uses UDP ports 137 and 138. In addition to 139 and 445, smbd
uses the TCP port 135.
This seems strange, then. There is no firewall on the machine. nmap
reports UDP 137 and 138 as open|filtered, but there is nothing
listening on TCP
I am trying to get Samba 3.4.0 (on an Ubuntu 9.10 box) set up as a file
server for my home. The router is 10.1.10.1; the Ubuntu box
(chronicles) is 10.1.10.2; the OS X box I'm using for testing purposes
(job) is 10.1.10.3. From job, I can see ports 139 and 445 on
chronicles are open. Neither
On Sun February 14 2010 10:44, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
I am trying to get Samba 3.4.0 (on an Ubuntu 9.10 box) set up as a
file server for my home. The router is 10.1.10.1; the Ubuntu box
(chronicles) is 10.1.10.2; the OS X box I'm using for testing
purposes (job) is 10.1.10.3. From job, I
I am using Ubuntu Linux 9.10 (the latest).
After I updated using the update manager the samba suite to the most current
packages, nmbd refuses to start.
I tried it manually, /usr/sbin/nmdb -D but it does nothing, (doesn't show up in
the process list). Could this update be broken?
stephen
2009/12/17 Stephen Eastman stephen_east...@yahoo.com:
I am using Ubuntu Linux 9.10 (the latest).
...
Could this update be broken?
Nope.
Maybe you disabled NB?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
(please, cc to the list.)
2009/12/17 Stephen Eastman stephen_east...@yahoo.com:
No NETBIOS is not disabled in the smb.conf file
(I assume that is what you are referring to)
Yes
I am also assuming you are running Ubuntu.
Yes, karmic, and samba's working fine here.
Maybe you'll like to post
Here is a print out of testparm:
r...@stephen-desktop:/etc# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Processing section [homes]
Processing section [printers]
Processing section [print$]
Processing section [www]
Processing section [homes]
Loaded services file OK.
Server role:
2009/12/17 Stephen Eastman stephen_east...@yahoo.com:
interfaces = 10.10.65.2/8, eth0, 127.0.0.1/8, lo
have you tried removing that line or formating it correctly (hint:
remove commas)? maybe making it just:
interfaces = eth0 lo
as you can see, your config (removing interfaces) works
2009/12/18 Stephen Eastman stephen_east...@yahoo.com:
I commented out that line and it seems to be working.
good!
regards,
norberto
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hi
2009/12/1 Battersby-Cornmell, Robin Alasdair
robin.battersby-cornm...@uisl.unisys.com:
Dear all,
I regret that I am very new to this tool from the install side. I have so
far altered shares on a running machine only.
I have (thanks to Joss for some help already) installed version
Dear all,
I regret that I am very new to this tool from the install side. I have so far
altered shares on a running machine only.
I have (thanks to Joss for some help already) installed version 3.4.3 under AIX
6.1 giving it our preferred base directory of /opt/freeware/samba/3.4.3
I have
On 12/03/09 05:29, Battersby-Cornmell, Robin Alasdair wrote:
Dear all,
I regret that I am very new to this tool from the install side. I have so far
altered shares on a running machine only.
I have (thanks to Joss for some help already) installed version 3.4.3 under AIX
6.1 giving it our
Dear all,
I regret that I am very new to this tool from the install side. I have so far
altered shares on a running machine only.
I have (thanks to Joss for some help already) installed version 3.4.3 under AIX
6.1 giving it our preferred base directory of /opt/freeware/samba/3.4.3
I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sometime after I installed samba and got everything working, one of my
colleagues changed the IP address on the box I did the install on. So
after I got passed all the other issues that plaqued me after moving
over to fedora 11, I discovered that I
_
http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M0906xWLM2009
Neu: Messenger 2009! Hier kostenlos downloaden!--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello List
Sorry to bring it up again, but this error [1] posted by Stefan is affecting
my Lenny 5.0 installation as well.
[1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-March/146841.html
I don't have selinux installed, so it is not responsible.
*) I see in nmbd.log and smbd.log both services
Hello List
Sorry to bring it up again, but this error [1] posted by Stefan is affecting
my Lenny 5.0 installation as well.
[1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-March/146841.html
I don't have selinux installed, so it is not responsible.
*) I see in nmbd.log and smbd.log both services
Hi,
I'm running Samba (3.0.32) on NetBSD (4.0.1) and everything seems to work fine
except for nmbd. It keeps trying to contact 10.0.0.255 but I'm not sure why. It
can't seem to resolve any names. However, the shares work and any operation
works using an IP address.
Can anyone point me in
I have a probably the same problem. I use Fedora 10 and the command
service nmb status
gives
nmbd is dead but pid file exists (or something similar)
Looking at the date of the pid file I noticed that it was a leftover from the
last shutdown. So, probably something is going wrong
+steve.onotsky=broadridge@lists.samba.org] On Behalf
Of Orban Piktor
Sent: March 11, 2009 11:28
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] nmbd-daemon fails on startup without error
I have a probably the same problem. I use Fedora 10 and the command
service nmb status
gives
nmbd
Dear all,
I'm setting up a wins server configuration with Samba 3.0.24
###
interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.1.0/24
bind interfaces only = Yes
name resolve order = lmhosts host bcast
preferred master = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins support = Yes
###
Hi guys,
I got a weird problem over here and couldn't find any solution in several days
searching.
If I switch my server on (Debian 5.0), the machine boots successfully, samba
logs tell me
[2009/03/05 09:13:30, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1213)
smbd version 3.2.5 started.
Copyright Andrew
Hello all,
I'm in the process of moving over my Samba server (using LDAP). I
believe everything is functioning correctly, except for this error I get
when nmbd starts. Looking back at my old server, it was apparently
doing this as well... so it may not even affect needed functionality.
: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 09:21 +0300, Teodor Iacob wrote:
Also nmblookup is using the external ip address:
querying HDV on 10.10.10.255
09:19:19.461813 IP X.X.X.X.45781 10.10.10.255.netbios-ns: NBT UDP
PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 5:26 AM
To: Teodor Iacob
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 09:21 +0300, Teodor Iacob wrote:
Also nmblookup is using the external ip
: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:05 +0300, Teodor Iacob wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for seeming impatient, I just had some rough night hours because of this
problem :)
tcpdump shows:
08:21:22.920832 IP
..
__
From: Frank Gruman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:29 AM
To: Teodor Iacob
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
On Mon, 2008-10
server HNS is now a local master browser for workgroup HOSTNAME on
subnet 10.10.10.1
*
Thank you for your time!
Teodor
_
From: Frank Gruman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:28 PM
To: Teodor Iacob
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd
@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 18:35 +0300, Teodor Iacob wrote:
Does anybody have a suggestion for another list or forum to address
this issue?
-Original Message-
From: Teodor Iacob
Sent
Does anybody have a suggestion for another list or forum to address
this issue?
-Original Message-
From: Teodor Iacob
Sent: 4 octombrie 2008 09:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
-Original
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 18:35 +0300, Teodor Iacob wrote:
Does anybody have a suggestion for another list or forum to address
this issue?
-Original Message-
From: Teodor Iacob
Sent: 4 octombrie 2008 09:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Nmbd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:41 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Nmbd is using the wrong ip address as source
Teodor Iacob wrote:
Hello,
I have
Hello,
I have a linux box with the following S/W versions:
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
Linux ns.hostname.ro 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 19:32:05 EDT 2008
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Version 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1
My server has 2 IP interfaces, eth0: with the public ip address and br0: for
Teodor Iacob wrote:
Hello,
I have a linux box with the following S/W versions:
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
Linux ns.hostname.ro 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 19:32:05 EDT 2008
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Version 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1
My server has 2 IP interfaces, eth0: with the public ip
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:36:49PM -0400, Onotsky, Steve x55328 wrote:
Once all of that was in place, I started up Samba via the Red Hat
startup script, but nmbd failed to load. The nmbd.log file indicates
that it can't open the smb.conf file, with the error Permission
denied. I've verified
Lendecke
Sent: October 1, 2008 11:10
To: Onotsky, Steve x55328
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] nmbd fails to start - permission denied
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:36:49PM -0400, Onotsky, Steve x55328 wrote:
Once all of that was in place, I started up Samba via the Red Hat
startup script
, 2008 11:10
To: Onotsky, Steve x55328
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] nmbd fails to start - permission denied
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:36:49PM -0400, Onotsky, Steve x55328 wrote:
Once all of that was in place, I started up Samba via the Red Hat
startup script, but nmbd failed
Hello all,
I have a new RHEL5 host, with nothing installed that falls outside of
the Base package group (that I selected) plus the CUPS 1.2.4 and Samba
3.0.28 packages.
All I've done to date on this host is perform yum updates to installed
packages and set up configurations for Samba and
Mark Jackson skrev:
Hi All,
Firstly, I know this is a MacOS X issue and not sure if you guys can help,
but I'm really hoping you can since I don't appear to be getting any joy
elsewhere.
Running OSX 10.5.4 and recently (last week) nmbd is hogging the CPU. I know
this is a part of the Samba
2008/8/21 Mark Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All,
Firstly, I know this is a MacOS X issue and not sure if you guys can help,
but I'm really hoping you can since I don't appear to be getting any joy
elsewhere.
Running OSX 10.5.4 and recently (last week) nmbd is hogging the CPU. I know
this
Hi All,
Firstly, I know this is a MacOS X issue and not sure if you guys can help,
but I'm really hoping you can since I don't appear to be getting any joy
elsewhere.
Running OSX 10.5.4 and recently (last week) nmbd is hogging the CPU. I know
this is a part of the Samba server on OSX, hence the
nmbd is using a lot of cpu:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd
log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second::
[2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0]
Hi,
I got the following entries in the /var/log/messages file:
nmbd[3718]: process_local_master_announce: incorrect name type for
destination from IP 192.168.0.10 (was 1d) should be 0x1e. Ignoring
packet.
Do I have to worry about these at all?
regards,
Tamas
--
To unsubscribe from this
I had been using and running samba (ver 3.0.23b) with no problems. I
installed a new hard drive on my ultra10 ( I know old). Now nmbd will
not run. When I issue svcs it indicates maintenance required but I
can't figure what is wrong. Any suggestions/ideas will be entertained.
--
--
To
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 08:19:22PM +0100, Petr Kopecky wrote:
Hi there,
I have found a problem with my Samba server 3.0.28. This problem appeared
suddenly without
any changes in configuration or server update.
NMBD becomes unresponsive in some minutes after startup with these options
Hi there,
I have found a problem with my Samba server 3.0.28. This problem appeared
suddenly without
any changes in configuration or server update.
NMBD becomes unresponsive in some minutes after startup with these options
enabled:
name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts
wins server =
On Saturday 09 February 2008 19:59:57 Anne Wilson wrote:
On a CentOS 5.1 server samba works perfectly as long as connections exist.
If no connections exist nmbd shuts down:
service smb status
smbd (pid 2970 2934) is running...
nmbd dead but pid file exists
On this last occasion it had
On a CentOS 5.1 server samba works perfectly as long as connections exist. If
no connections exist nmbd shuts down:
service smb status
smbd (pid 2970 2934) is running...
nmbd dead but pid file exists
On this last occasion it had been less than 5 minutes between connections.
What could be
Hello after the last samba update all of my Ubuntu Servers do segfault
on nmbd:
[2007/11/16 08:36:09, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(727)
Netbios nameserver version 3.0.22 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2006
[2007/11/16 08:36:09, 1] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(3400)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking for a solution to this problem. I have Googled all over the
place but haven't found a definitive answer.
I have a Samba Server that ONCE was on a network where there was
SECOND Samba Server with IP Address 192.168.20.3. Today, the FIRST
server is on a network
Looking for a solution to this problem. I have Googled all over the
place but haven't found a definitive answer.
I have a Samba Server that ONCE was on a network where there was SECOND
Samba Server with IP Address 192.168.20.3. Today, the FIRST server is
on a network with an address range
I have a permanent entry made in wins.dat for server SAMIDA-S01. However
after a while a wins query (nmblookup -U localhost -R SAMIDA-S01) gets
responded with name_query failed.
Debug says the name is expired but the database dump has it as permament.
SAMIDA-S01 is a PDC of an other domain in
Hello,
I've found this issue reported only once before but no real answer was
provided/found.
I am trying to migrate from an old 2.0.7 server, but the bundled
install 3.0.24 on FC6 is giving me major pain. Putting aside the
actual configuration and user migration which I need to figure out,
the
Every day, I get this error message. It's always around 4:02AM.
Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: [2006/07/06 04:02:10, 0]
nmbd/nmbd.c:process(596)
Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: Got SIGHUP dumping debug
info.
Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: [2006/07/06 04:02:10, 0]
Hi
I´ve been seeing this issue since we updated from Samba 2.X to 3.Y, and
I wanted to know if anyone has seen this:
I have a samba PDC mantaining a domain composed of WinXP, Win200 and
win98 machines with shared folders and user authentication (smbpasswd).
It works fine for hours but then
Approximately every 30 seconds a friend receives a nmbd[1892] error.
I believe it is related to Samba.
As I'm a complete novice can someone please advise.
Carbon
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Keith wrote:
Approximately every 30 seconds a friend receives a nmbd[1892] error.
I believe it is related to Samba.
As I'm a complete novice can someone please advise.
Ummm, how about posting the error message?
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Approximately every 30 seconds a friend receives a nmbd[1892] error.
I believe it is related to Samba.
As I'm a complete novice can someone please advise.
Carbon
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi,
I am new to the list and I have a question already.
I am noticing the following entry in my /var/log/message file:
Mar 5 04:03:31 dbserver1 nmbd[7317]: name_to_nstring:
workgroup name MSHOME,DATABASESRV is too long. Truncating to
MSHOME,DATABASE
It is in there a lot. Is this
Hi ppl, im using samba 3.0.14debian (Sarge) and every 15 minutes it lost
the browse list...
In the log.nmbd shows:
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:expire_workgroups_and_servers(327)
and then for every machine:
expire_old_servers: Removing timed out server ...
I have no idea why this is happening...
For many samba releases (maybe for longer than 3.0) I see that the nmbd (PDC
WINS) doesn't shutdown on the first kill signal but on the second.
Any idea?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm getting a lot of error messages like this:
[2006/02/08 08:56:09, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:validate_nmb_packet(1362)
validate_nmb_packet: Bad REG/REFRESH Packet. validate_nmb_packet:
Ignoring request packet with opcode 5.
in my nmbd.log file.
Hello everybody,
from time to time our nmbd daemon quits his job and the last time he did
this he told us:
[2006/01/25 15:56:02, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(58)
Got SIGTERM: going down...
So my question is: What is the cause of this behaviour and in special
what is happening when nmbd exists
Hello everybody,
i have already posted this message yesterday, but i didn't receive my
posting. There i want to repeat it.
From time to time our nmbd daemon quits his job and the last time he did
this he told us:
[2006/01/25 15:56:02, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(58)
Got SIGTERM: going down...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Meiler wrote:
From time to time our nmbd daemon quits his job and the last
time he did this he told us:
[2006/01/25 15:56:02, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(58)
Got SIGTERM: going down...
So my question is: What is the cause of this
These are already open. I'm pretty sure that NT4/2003 PDC's make a
DCE/RPC over TCP connection to pull down the 1b entries from the wins
server. I have done packet captures on test NT4 wins server to see how
PDC's pull their domain lists, and I see the port 135 three way
handshake, which then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamie Crawford wrote:
These are already open. I'm pretty sure that NT4/2003 PDC's make a
DCE/RPC over TCP connection to pull down the 1b entries from the wins
server. I have done packet captures on test NT4 wins server to see how
PDC's pull
I have a slight browsing problem. We seem to have multiple domain
browse lists that aren't being merged at our wins server. For example,
on 2003DOMAIN, I only see 3 domains/workgroups. On NT4DOMAINA, I see 3
domains/workgroups, and on NT4DOMAINB I see 56 domains/workgroups, and
on NT4DOMAINC I
I was wondering if the pdc's need to have port 135 open on the wins
server to be able to upload and download its domain master browse
list to the wins server.
According to netstat -lnp | grep nmbd ports 137 and 138 (udp) are
used for name queries, so I'd suggest opening them up too, for all
Remeber that Swat do not always report the correct state of the
running deamons.
Please look at the processes with top or ps to be sure that they are
running.
//H
24 sep 2005 kl. 16.08 skrev Bíró Gáspár Péter:
Hi!
I'm a Linux beginner, and I installed Suse Linux 8.2 to my computer.
I
Hi!
I'm a Linux beginner, and I installed Suse Linux 8.2 to my computer.
I installed Samba too... Then I configured it... I wrote in to the web
browser: http://localhost:901. Swat came in, and I configured things
what I read in a Samba book. Then I started smbd, and nmbd. Smbd
worked, but nmbd
My PDC Samba nmbd is intermittently delaying responses to
name queries. As
an example, i run:
nmblookup -U 192.168.75.11 -R PDC#1C
from a member server, and the .11 machine will respond.
Repeat this a few
times, and the .11 machine stops reponding. After a while
(and you keep
My PDC Samba nmbd is intermittently delaying responses to name queries. As
an example, i run:
nmblookup -U 192.168.75.11 -R PDC#1C
from a member server, and the .11 machine will respond. Repeat this a few
times, and the .11 machine stops reponding. After a while (and you keep
trying, add -d
Hello everybody,
i'm just setting up a samba server as pdc with ldap backend.
everything but netbios works fine.
The system is called aadmt00 and is a pdc (virtual) and is bound to the ip
192.168.53.180
hgest3201:~ # ip addr list
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436
Hi,
I get constantly every some secondes this entry in log.nmd
[2005/06/30 15:11:22, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(284)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet 192.168.53.180: netmask= 255.255.255.0:
TOPTEST(1) current master browser = AADMT00
After setting up a working SAMBA test server, attempts to move it to
production failed.
The plan was to replace an old file server upgrading to 3.7 OpenBSD
and SAMBA 3.0.14a.
The test server worked in a test environment, but when moved to the
production network replacing the existing
This is a config issue, at least I hope so. I have a wbel v3 box (same
as rhel v3 box) with 2 nics and it acts as both my firewall and my samba
server.
eth0: WAN (dhclient to my cable modem provider)
eth1: LAN (dhcpdfor my private network)
The relevant part of my /etc/samba/smb.conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shane Drinkwater wrote:
| Hello,
| I am getting this error on a remote linux box running Fedora Core 3.
| basically just the nmbd process dies leaving the smbds running
| Netbios nameserver version 3.0.11 started.
| Copyright Andrew Tridgell and
Hello,
I am getting this error on a remote linux box running Fedora Core 3.
basically just the nmbd process dies leaving the smbds running
Netbios nameserver version 3.0.11 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2004
[2005/03/17 13:25:15, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
Can you compile with -g and send in a full stack backtrace so
we can see exactly where it's failing and if this is fixed in
3.0.7 ?
Thank you for the suggestion, but I never compiled samba, simply
used the redhat rpm. So I will install 3.0.7 and watch if the
error occurs again.
- Jo
--
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
