Hello!
Some days ago we migrated our production domain from Windows NT 4.0 to
Samba 3.3.4 (Yes - such migrations still happen these days :-)). After
migration we noticed, that from time to time the domain adminstrator
account gets locked - pdbedit shows the flags [UXL]. It is easy to
from the man page:
netbios aliases (G)
This is a list of NetBIOS names that nmbd will advertise as
additional names by which the Samba server is known. This allows
one machine to appear in browse lists under multiple names. If a
machine is acting as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new PDC.
Why not keeping the same name for your server? Then with same name and
same IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Nicole wrote:
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new PDC.
Why not
Yes I know it now , it is logical captain but the preceding person which
installed the old samba version has written the samba version in the
server string statement !!!
Ouch!
and it would be very confusing for users and
admins ...
I don't think the users would notice, and maybe not even
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new
Frank Bonnet schrieb:
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the new PDC.
Why you use IPs on the client instead of names? Here we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Frank Bonnet schrieb:
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP address for the
Frank Bonnet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
We are facing a bit boring problem
We are on the way to upgrade our PDC from 2.2.8 to 3.2.11
as we do not want to reconfigure the PDC IP address on several
hundreds of windows XP clients we have chosen to keep the same
IP
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Florian Götz f.go...@hs-mannheim.de wrote:
Hi all,
I'm rather new to samba and trying to deploy a PDC/BDC Setup for our company.
Got some books and the manpages here to help me :)
The config-files are attached at the end of this mail. Used Samba is
Hi all,
I'm rather new to samba and trying to deploy a PDC/BDC Setup for our company.
Got some books and the manpages here to help me :)
The config-files are attached at the end of this mail. Used Samba is 3.2.7-11.6
on a SLES11 system.
The PDC is running as ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC says testparm, the
Hi Adam. I'm sorry for the late answer. Ok I've added the machine
account manually with a .ldif. Then, when the client join the domain,
samba modifiy the entry, with sambaSID and other.
On the client I receive: Joined Domain DOMINIO
but on log I still receive:
_netr_ServerAuthenticate2:
try searching google for netlogon_creds_server_check: credentials check
failed. since that is the error in the log. i've never seen it before.
in reference to Another thing, after joined the domain, i can see
domain users with getent passwd? Or I must add ldap support on the
client computer?
Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 12:31 -0700 schrieb MargoAndTodd:
Hi All,
I just upgraded a workstation server to a PDC server.
I am using tbdsam as my user database.
Question 1: As a workgroup server, I created my groups
in /etc/group (groupadd). Is this still the case?
Do I also need
Hi All,
I just upgraded a workstation server to a PDC server.
I am using tbdsam as my user database.
Question 1: As a workgroup server, I created my groups
in /etc/group (groupadd). Is this still the case?
Do I also need to tell Samba about a different database
for groups?
Question 2:
i would delete uid=debian$,ou=Computers,dc=DOMINIO and load this ldif:
dn: uid=debian$,ou=Computers,dc=DOMINIO
objectClass: person
objectClass: posixAccount
objectClass: top
objectClass: shadowAccount
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
cn: debian$
uid: debian$
sn:
But why with windows machine it works fine..no errors?
Adam Williams wrote:
sounds like a problem with the smbldap-useradd tool. I've never used
it because on centos and fedora i got perl errors when running them.
so I just create the ldap accounts manually by loading an .ldif file.
--
Ok. I've deleted the last ldap db, and renewed. I'm trying to add
manually the machine trust account. This is an ldif from slapcat:
dn: uid=debian$,ou=Computers,dc=DOMINIO
objectClass: top
objectClass: account
objectClass: posixAccount
objectClass: sambaSamAccount
cn: debian$
uid: debian$
Hi Adam.
Thanks for your reply. But I've not added the Computers account for
paris$ manually. Samba give me the error, but it also make the entry in
ldap.
The entry:
# paris$, Computers, DOMINIO
dn: uid=paris$,ou=Computers,dc=DOMINIO
objectClass: top
objectClass: account
sounds like a problem with the smbldap-useradd tool. I've never used it
because on centos and fedora i got perl errors when running them. so I
just create the ldap accounts manually by loading an .ldif file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.05.2009 16:53, schrieb Adam Williams:
sounds like a problem with the smbldap-useradd tool. I've never used it
because on centos and fedora i got perl errors when running them.
smbldap-tools are available in the rpmforge-repo (
Hello,
I`ve installed on a Box with SuSE 10.2 a PDC with OpenLDAP as Backend for
testing.
I put a Xp-Machine in that domain, logged me in. Everything looks fine.
After the logout from Windows there is a dir .ntprofile in my home.
Everythings seems to work as expected.
Now, I put a file under Unix
Hi there. I've a problem with using samba as Primary Domain Controller
with backend ldap. Version release (Samba 3.2.5, OpenLDAP 2.4.11) on
Debian Lenny.
When I try to join the domain with a Windows XP Pro Client, all works
fine...profiles updating, logon, ecc..but when I try to join the domain
paris$ should not have a SID until it creates it upon joining the
domain. you should not have done smbpasswd -a -m paris, so if you did,
do smbpasswd -x paris\$ and try rejoining.
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hi there. I've a problem with using samba as Primary Domain Controller
with backend
Hi the list,
I am in a process of converting a Samba PDC to BDC and a BDC to PDC am
running into some issues.
1. For each of the samba servers, I have two configuration files. One
is for PDC and the other for BDC. I make a symbolic link from one of
the two files to /etc/samba/smb.conf
Hi,
I have roaming profile issue on my SAMBA PDC with an LDAP backend
running on FreeBSD 6.3. It seems that randomly, user's profile get
corrupted on windows XP. When that happens, the user log in as usual
(%userprofile% variable is set and all the share are properly
connected) but he gets
Hi,
This is with reference to kerberos mailing list (
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-December/006868.html) on the
Samba PDC and Kerberos.
I am trying to make Samba PDC in a AD (LDAP + KRB) domain.
Could you please answer few of my queries on the same issue.
1. Whats the problem
Hi,
This is with reference to kerberos mailing list (
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2004-December/006868.html) on the
Samba PDC and Kerberos.
I am trying to make Samba PDC in a AD (LDAP + KRB) domain.
Could you please answer few of my queries on the same issue.
1. Whats the problem
Hello,
A few weeks ago I was trying to add a Server 2008 machine to my network that
is using an NT 4.0 PDC. I ran into issues both with Samba communication with
Server 2008 and with NT communication with server 2008 so I downgraded and
installed Server 2003 on that machine instead.
Now when I
their
autobiography until after they're dead.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:13 PM, David Wells d.we...@vitalcan.com.ar wrote:
Victor Medina wrote:
Hi Guys!
Probably this is not the best place to ask, I'll try anyway... =)
I've been trying to configure a Samba PDC and a Squid Porxy server
.org/EWDW
Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/migrating-Samba-PDC-to-a-new-server-tp22861046p22900728.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list
it should work ok. make sure to run net getlocalsid and net
getdomainsid and write them down and on the new server do net
setlocalsid and net setdomainsid if they are different.
Kent Tong wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to migrate Samba 3.0.24-6etch10 PDC running on a Debian server to a
new
Ubuntu
?
Thanks in advance!
-
--
Kent Tong
Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW
Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/migrating-Samba-PDC-to-a-new-server-tp22861046p22861046.html
Hi Guys!
Probably this is not the best place to ask, I'll try anyway... =)
I've been trying to configure a Samba PDC and a Squid Porxy server
with NTLM auth on the same machine but NTML_AUTH keeps complaining
about: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE I have others machines running
Squid
Victor Medina wrote:
Hi Guys!
Probably this is not the best place to ask, I'll try anyway... =)
I've been trying to configure a Samba PDC and a Squid Porxy server
with NTLM auth on the same machine but NTML_AUTH keeps complaining
about: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE I have others machines
place to ask, I'll try anyway... =)
I've been trying to configure a Samba PDC and a Squid Porxy server
with NTLM auth on the same machine but NTML_AUTH keeps complaining
about: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE I have others machines running
Squid and Authenticating against a Samba Server
to configure a Samba PDC and a Squid Porxy server
with NTLM auth on the same machine but NTML_AUTH keeps complaining
about: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE I have others machines running
Squid and Authenticating against a Samba Server but on different
machines, this is the first time a try both
Your PDC and BDC must have the same SID,
Your BDCs ldap database should be a copy of Your PDCs. Also the BDC should
be a slave to the PDCs ldap. So every change in Your
PDcs database should change on your BDC. This is quite simple with slurpd.
If the PDC now stops the BDC will take over. The users
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Daniel Müller muel...@tropenklinik.de wrote:
Your PDC and BDC must have the same SID,
Your BDCs ldap database should be a copy of Your PDCs. Also the BDC should
be a slave to the PDCs ldap. So every change in Your
PDcs database should change on your BDC. This
Thanks Daniel and John.
I am not using slurp. I am using rsync to syncronize all data base.
I need to know if the BDC can write his local LDAP data base. If it is
OK, I think that the domain go to work well, regardless if the conection
betwen PDC and BDC is broken or not.
Can your help me?
I am not using slurp. I am using rsync to syncronize all data base.
I need to know if the BDC can write his local LDAP data base. If it is OK, I
think that the domain go to work well, regardless if the conection betwen
PDC and BDC is broken or not.
Can your help me?
Tanks.
I would use
-- Forwarded message --
Sorry John. I made a mistake. I am not using rsync. I am using syncrepl.
It works very well in multimaster mode.
Do you know if is possible that the BDC can write in the LDAP data base?
Juan Pablo Michelino
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
but to have there shares accesseable you should hve the same shares
on PDC and BDC. Write a script when you log on or off to rsync the files of
the users.
How do you reliably capture logoff events?
I thought slurpd was deprecated years ago when openldap-2.3 came out.
It is (was). Current
Hello
I makeing a Domain Controller with Samba (v3.0.33) and LDAP (v2.4).
I will install a PDC in the headquarter and a BDC in the subsidiary of
the company that I work.
The PDC and the BDC will have his own LDAP data base.
I just install the PDC without problems and my next step is to install
at the existing openldap UIDs and GIDs in use and what the
samba PDC wants to use I see some uid/gid collisions. For example I see
that the Domain Admins uses gid 512, just so happens to be the same as a
file system group(in the ldap directory).
Is it better to change the users group gid and leave
servers that are members of the current NT4 PDC.
While looking at the existing openldap UIDs and GIDs in use and what the
samba PDC wants to use I see some uid/gid collisions. For example I see
that the Domain Admins uses gid 512, just so happens to be the same as a
file system group(in the ldap
, March 24, 2009 1:38 PM
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] gidNumber's and ldap backed samba PDC
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:10 -0500, Derek Werthmuller wrote:
In the planning process for migrating from NT4 PDC, and external ldap
directory to samba 3.2.8 PDC. The external existing
and what the
samba PDC wants to use I see some uid/gid collisions. For example I see
that the Domain Admins uses gid 512, just so happens to be the same as a
file system group(in the ldap directory).
No, it doesn't. RID != GID. A RID is a component of the SID and SIDs
are mapped to UIDs
Eric Woltermann wolleric at gmx.de writes:
Sorry, should have taken more time for that step. :)
http://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/~ew/samba.log.gz
Could someone at least give me a hint where to search for a clue on this strange
delay (smb.conf, DNS and/or DHCP, etc.)? Just had about four seconds
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 19:31 +0100, LiPi - wrote:
Despite that RID!=GID, mappings between samba rids and groups must be
there if you want the server to act as a PDC. If there are some GID's
mapped to i.e. RID 512, and these GID is used by another group, then
there will be a conflict.
No,
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 13:31 -0500, Derek Werthmuller wrote:
Ok I see it appears that the ldap entries that samba needs in the directory
are under a different O. ou=groups,o=smb,dc=unav,dc=es for example.
dn: cn=Domain Admins,ou=groups,o=smb,dc=unav,dc=es
objectClass: posixGroup
objectClass:
Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE writes:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:19:04PM +0100, LiPi - wrote:
There is a button that says:
Download
It does not require any registration...
Tried it, did nothing for me.
Volker
Btw, I'm reading this list through Gmane (not
Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE writes:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 06:54:08PM +, Eric Woltermann wrote:
[2009/03/20 18:43:45, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(240)
Tester opened file Tester/ntuser.ini read=Yes write=No (numopen=2)
[2009/03/20 18:43:49, 3]
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:07:42AM +, Eric Woltermann wrote:
thanks for the quick reply. Just took the log you
requested; it's available at
http://speedshare.org/download.php?id=DFF4FCB13 (~63 kB
gzipped). The log starts at the first line after pressing
This spam thing just says Bitte
Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE writes:
This spam thing just says Bitte warten Sie. Apparently it
wants me to sign up for the premium account anything. Sorry,
but I will not pay for getting that log file.
Volker
Sorry, should have taken more time for that step. :)
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:19:04PM +0100, LiPi - wrote:
There is a button that says:
Download
It does not require any registration...
Tried it, did nothing for me.
Volker
pgpj6zGrt4flj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hello everyone,
I'm using Samba 3.0.30 as PDC in my home-LAN, the clients are all XP Pro SP2.
Everything is working as it should, although I notice an annoying and quite
random login delay of 1-5 seconds for all user-machine combinations. The log
lines below (log-level 2) are for example what I
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 06:54:08PM +, Eric Woltermann wrote:
[2009/03/20 18:43:45, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(240)
Tester opened file Tester/ntuser.ini read=Yes write=No (numopen=2)
[2009/03/20 18:43:49, 3] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(228)
Tester closed file Tester/ntuser.dat
Shahid,
You used the command 'net join' to join in domain Samba PDC in M3?
My problem is when I join the M3 in domain Samba PDC (M1) with the
command 'net join', after this, I can not access the M3 using Kerberos
authentication.
Other description,
Your error is [1]:
ads_secrets_verify_ticket
Samba PDC:
M3# net join -U root
Enter root's password:
Joined domain _LOCAL_.
3 - M4 Access M3 with auth Kerberos fail.
M4# smbclient //M3/publico -k
cli_session_setup_blob: receive failed (NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE)
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
4 - In M3, delete /var/lib
2009
48444 blocks of size 262144. 36638 blocks available
smb: \ quit
2 - M3 Join Samba PDC:
M3# net join -U root
Enter root's password:
Joined domain _LOCAL_.
3 - M4 Access M3 with auth Kerberos fail.
M4# smbclient //M3/publico -k
cli_session_setup_blob: receive failed
,
Pankaj S Zanwar/India/i...@ibmin
Subject
Re: [Samba] Samba PDC - Kerberised
CIFS access
Hallo, Shahid,
Du meintest am 13.03.09:
Thanks much for all the information you have shared with us regarding
the samba issue.
I used net rpc join command to join into the domain hosted by M1.
I was able to join to the domain successfully.
And for these kind words you push again 17 kByte
Hi Shahid,
I so sorry, but I don't understand your collocation about your answer.
You managed to join the M3 in Samba PDC, and same time accessing it
through the Kerberos authentication? Was that?
Helmut, I so sorry!
Thanks!
2009/3/13 Shahid M Shaikh shahid.sha...@in.ibm.com:
Hi Eduardo
Hi Eduardo,
M1 is Samba PDC. It is hosting a domain. It also stores domain users.
Though samba password for all the users are invalid in smbpasswd.
M3 is CIFS Server and is part of the domain of Samba PDC. Hence I join M3
into M1 using net rpc join.
For that I have created a machine user account
Shahid,
I have same problem, but, I use Domain Heimdal Kerberos, look this bug ticket:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5810
The developers have not yet responded.
Thanks!
2009/3/11 Shahid M Shaikh shahid.sha...@in.ibm.com:
Hi All,
I have machine M1 hosting Samba PDC. It stores
Hi All,
I have machine M1 hosting Samba PDC. It stores only user information.
I have machine M2 acting as KDC server.
I have machine M3 hosting CIFS shares and it joins into the domain hosted
by PDC M1.
I have machine M4 used as CIFS client.
On M2, I have added users and cifs/host service
I have the distribution Samba package 3.2.3 running under Ubuntu 8.10
Workstation, downloaded using Synaptics Package Manager. It is running as a
PDC. On some of my Windows XP workstations, the Windows profiles appearing
under System Properties Advanced User Profiles appear correct, in the
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:36 -0600, Jeff McInish wrote:
I have the distribution Samba package 3.2.3 running under Ubuntu 8.10
Workstation, downloaded using Synaptics Package Manager. It is running as a
PDC. On some of my Windows XP workstations, the Windows profiles appearing
under System
Hello all,
I am trying to add W2K8 server to our domain ns.local. This domain is
working O.K. for all XP machines we have (~10), but when adding a W2K8
server, I get user/pass prompt and then after typing my* username and
password I get:
---
Computer Name/Domain Changes
Hi All,
I'm in the need to migrate a PDC based on samba 3 with TDB backend (on a
Fedora 8 Box) onto a new server (based on Ubuntu server 8.10).
Il call them OLD and NEW from now on.
I've tried to install the new server with LDAP module for authentication
(following the documents found on ubuntu
Is this a clean way to proceed ? is there a simpler way to migrate the
configurations/users/machine accounts?
You probably just missed setting the SID; make sure net getlocalsid
returns the same thing on the new PDC as it did on the old PDC (use net
setlocalsid). I believe the local and
Hello
THANK YOU I never even thought to look there that must be the problem
seems obvious now. It is still not working but this maybe something I
have done since.
Feb 18 10:41:37 canada winbindd[2705]: [2009/02/18 10:41:37, 0]
libsmb/namequery.c:saf_store(75)
Feb 18 10:41:37 canada
Hi
Yes it is working I just added the following not sure if they are all
needed but at last it is working for Win98 Clients and Samba Version
3.2.8-0.26.fc10.
lanman auth = Yes
ntlm auth = No
lm announce = Yes
client lanman auth = Yes
Carl
Thanks again once I am
Hello
I have a Fedora 6 with samba 3.0.2465 working great as a PDC with Win98
clients. The server has domain logon working and login scripts running I
have made a second server to replace the first but after upgrading
beyond Fedora 8 it no longer works. I can see shares with Vista64
Business
I have a Fedora 6 with samba 3.0.2465 working great as a PDC with
Win98 clients. The server has domain logon working and login scripts
running I have made a second server to replace the first but after
upgrading beyond Fedora 8 it no longer works. I can see shares with
Vista64 Business and
Please see
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-January/062827.html
Thanks,
Volker
Apologies, I searched the samba archives and not the samba-technical.
Thank you,
Nick.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 07:58:38PM +1100, Nicolas Triantafillou wrote:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-January/062827.html
Thanks,
Volker
Apologies, I searched the samba archives and not the samba-technical.
Thank you,
No problem. I'm listening to both lists :-)
Hi all,
I've been playing around with the Windows 7 Beta to see if it's viable
for our company and I've been testing it with samba. I've been able to
browse shares via \\server\sharename without a problem but I'm unable to
get it to connect to the samba pdc (which currently works fine with XP
it to connect to the samba pdc (which currently works fine with XP /
Vista).
Please see
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-January/062827.html
Thanks,
Volker
pgpFee8axtu1C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
Hi,
I have setup samba as a PDC with kerberos and ldap. While adding the windows
clients I get the following error message on the logs, and windows says the
user name and password is incorrect
[2008/12/31 19:00:09, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(1059)
[2008/12/31 19:00:09, 0]
@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] samba PDC, cannot add windows workstations
Hi,
I have setup samba as a PDC with kerberos and ldap. While adding the windows
clients I get the following error message on the logs, and windows says the
user name and password is incorrect
[2008/12/31 19:00:09, 0] lib
Please help. I've been searching for days, trying nearly everything I can find
that seems relevant, but I can't get this working.
I am able to create users, login to Windows systems joined to the SAMBA domain
as those users, but filesystem ACLs on Windows Domain Member Servers do not
work
Hello,
I want to migrate from an old NT4 PDC to a Samba version 3.0.26a.
My BDC configuration for migration is
[global]
workgroup = DOMAIN
server string = %h server Samba %v
interfaces = eth0, 192.168.1.0/24, lo
bind interfaces only = Yes
security =
Hello,
i try to use windows wins with samba pdc, but i face the following
problem:
When PDC samba start, nmbd is broadcasting a request for domain master
browser (domain is TEST). I see this in nmbd log file:
become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server from IP 0.0.0.0
Windows machines
to a Samba PDC?
Thanks,
Patrick
Patrick Camilleri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everybody,
I have a Windows Server 2008 with terminal services enabled joined to a
Samba domain (SuSe server) and I'm able to login as 'domain\user' when I'm
groups that need to be defined
in the Samba PDC, mainly Domain Admins, Domain Users and Domain Guests? Or
maybe because I'm not setting up any policies in the netlogon Samba folder?
Any help greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Patrick
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Hello there
I've just been trying to get a NetApp FAS2020, DataOnTap 7.2.5.1 to join
our domain. No luck so far . The PDC is samba 3.2.4 with ldap backend.
I created the account manually and when I try to join the NetApp I get
these in the samba logs.
[2008/11/14 08:32:48, 0]
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:57:22AM +0100, Robert Gehr wrote:
Hello there
I've just been trying to get a NetApp FAS2020, DataOnTap 7.2.5.1 to join
our domain. No luck so far . The PDC is samba 3.2.4 with ldap backend.
I created the account manually and when I try to join the NetApp I get
My PDC (Ubuntu 8.04, samba 3.0.28a) shows up in the browse list as two
workgroups
THELMA (the netbios name for the machine)
Workgroup THELMA is empty
and
ATLANTA (the domain name)
THELMA is listed inside workgroup ATLANTA
running
nmblookup -A 127.0.0.1
yields
THELMA
Steven Geerts wrote:
Hi
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d
/var/llib/nobody %u
Isnt this a typo (/var/llib).
Regards
Brent Clark
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Yes it was, but this didn't solve my problem :-)
Thanks
sg
-Original Message-
From: Brent Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 27 oktober 2008 9:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] pdc
Steven Geerts wrote:
Hi
add
On Friday October 24 2008 11:50:53 Steven Geerts wrote:
workgroup = LOCALDOMAIN.BE
Are . valid in workgroup names?
I remember having problems with mine, so I changed the dot to a _
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
]
Subject: Re: [Samba] pdc
On Friday October 24 2008 11:50:53 Steven Geerts wrote:
workgroup = LOCALDOMAIN.BE
Are . valid in workgroup names?
I remember having problems with mine, so I changed the dot to a _
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Geerts wrote:
I think your mixing with netbios name.
How do you specify otherwise whether your domain is .com or .be, or ...
In the case of Active Directory you do so by specifying the realm
option in your smb.conf, the workgroup parameter
I've configured a Samba server based on Ubuntu packages. It uses LDAP as
backend.
The server announces itself using two netbios (?) names - OFFICE and SERVER.
Originally I had planned to use OFFICE. Then I switched to SERVER.
I've looked at the config files and search for any occurences of
Jason,
I don't know who are you replying to.
Quoting Jason A. Nunnelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Norberto Bensa wrote:
On Friday October 24 2008 11:50:53 Steven Geerts wrote:
workgroup = LOCALDOMAIN.BE
Are . valid in workgroup names?
I remember having problems with mine, so I
Hi, Patrick!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:26:39PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
I've configured a Samba server based on Ubuntu packages. It uses LDAP as
backend.
The server announces itself using two netbios (?) names - OFFICE and SERVER.
Originally I had planned to use OFFICE. Then I
501 - 600 of 2662 matches
Mail list logo
