On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should
Hi Sebastian,
If you run ps ax | grep smbd while samba is running and see running smbd
processes, then most (probably all even) vfs objects should run (including
recycle).
Ricky
On Feb 22, 2013 4:01 AM, Sebastian Arcus s...@open-t.co.uk wrote:
On 21/02/13 23:26, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01:11AM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Hi Jeremy. Thanks for the reply. Would that mean that it is not
possible to use the recycle bin in the ADS domain mode?
It's nothing to do with the ADS domain mode, it's to
do with what fileserver backend you're using.
smbd ==
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just checked if
I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in Samba 3 - and
it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I file it as a bug report -
or Samba 4 supports/will support this functionality in some other way?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:24:26PM +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Just a quick check here before I file a bug report. I've just
checked if I can use the recycle VFS object in Samba 4 like I do in
Samba 3 - and it seems that is not implemented yet. Should I file it
as a bug report - or Samba 4
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Possible bug in nss_winbind with ad backend
and rfc2307
I ran some tests to see why getent passwd was not enumerating
my domain users and discovered this:
If I getent passwd username it returns the user information
including the primary group defined
I ran some tests to see why getent passwd was not enumerating my domain
users and discovered this:
If I getent passwd username it returns the user information including
the primary group defined in the Unix attributes.
If I add a Unix GID in the idmap config range to the domain's Domain
Users
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:26:16PM +0100, Christiane Baier wrote:
don't know if this behavior is a bug, but I want to share this
information.
samba server version 3.4.3 is installed on solaris10 x86
compiled with gcc
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
Hello,
don't know if this behavior is a bug, but I want to share this
information.
samba server version 3.4.3 is installed on solaris10 x86
compiled with gcc
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
Configured with:
Hi all,
I have found what appears to be a bug in 3.0.24. I upgraded from 3.0.22 and
have been using this
setup for some time. Also using a LDAP backend.
My existing users had ldap profile directory set as follows:
\\%L\profiles\username
And samba home share as
\\%L\username
However, once
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:12:37AM -0800, Greg wrote:
I have found what appears to be a bug in 3.0.24. I upgraded from 3.0.22 and
have been using this
setup for some time. Also using a LDAP backend.
Set 'passdb expand explicit = yes'
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hello,
When running net rpc trustdom establish command for PDC trusts, I got
the following error with a core dump in 3.0.21c, on HP-UX and
3.0.21c-7.1.5-SUSE-SL10.0.
Couldn't connect to domain MY_DOM controller. Error was
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.
bt
#0 0xc016f4d4 in memset () from
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 04:34:49PM -0600, Li, Ying (ESG) wrote:
Hello,
When running net rpc trustdom establish command for PDC trusts, I got
the following error with a core dump in 3.0.21c, on HP-UX and
3.0.21c-7.1.5-SUSE-SL10.0.
Fixed them in SVN - thanks !
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from
Gentlemen, Developers,
Please take a look at my post below. Especially the part that starts
with What I know so far and BUT!!!... Could this be a bug in Samba?
Please respond...
On ma, 2006-08-14 at 13:04 +0200, S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
Hi ho there...
Environment: IIS 6.0 with everything
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:28:38AM +0200, S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
Please take a look at my post below. Especially the part that starts
with What I know so far and BUT!!!... Could this be a bug in Samba?
Yes, it is a known bug in Samba that is not easy to fix.
Tridge has figured out how the
Thank you very much! That was what I needed to know... Now I can stop
searching and wait for the update to come out...
Any idea when this should be implemented? A few weeks? A few months?
Thanks again!
On di, 2006-08-15 at 09:42 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:28:38AM
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:50:37AM +0200, S. J. van Harmelen wrote:
Thank you very much! That was what I needed to know... Now I can stop
searching and wait for the update to come out...
Any idea when this should be implemented? A few weeks? A few months?
I'd say a few months rather than a
hi list,
i experienced a weird behaviour of samba in the latest versions
(3.0.20[a,b]) on XFS:
directory:
/data (owner=iso,group=edv)
permissions: 2770
if i put a file in there with permissions 644 (owner=root,group=edv) i
cannot delete it. windows tells even tells me, that it's readonly
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, November 04, 2004 at
11:31 PM -0800 wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 11:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:40:07PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
The ldap client libraries are from openldap-2.1.29.
I would use strace to find out who
Configuration Overview:
OS: Fedora Core 2
Samba: 3.0.7-2 (as distributed) configured as a PDC using ldap for
authentication info
LDAP: openldap 2.1.29
Ever since we upgraded to Samba 3 we've been having problems with users
randomly getting disconnected from our
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:04:44PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
Configuration Overview:
OS: Fedora Core 2
Samba:3.0.7-2 (as distributed) configured as a PDC using ldap for
authentication info
LDAP: openldap 2.1.29
Ever since we upgraded to Samba 3 we've been
Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, November 04, 2004 at 4:25 PM
-0800 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:04:44PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
Configuration Overview:
OS: Fedora Core 2
Samba: 3.0.7-2 (as distributed) configured as a PDC using ldap for
authentication info
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:40:07PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
The ldap client libraries are from openldap-2.1.29.
I would use strace to find out who is resetting that signal
handler. It isn't smbd.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 11:49, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:40:07PM -0800, Erik Horn wrote:
The ldap client libraries are from openldap-2.1.29.
I would use strace to find out who is resetting that signal
handler. It isn't smbd.
nss_ldap? That was the suspect in one
After weeks of fighting against Samba 3.0.7 from the source with
acl-support, to make it ACL aware, I had found that always get an error
message
Too many ACE entries for file XYZ to convert to convert to posix perms
I compiled 3.0.2a and it worked perfect. tryed again with 3.0.7 and again
the
Hi,
Sorry, it's not a reply on topic but:
If You are Victor Velixon formerly Sensormatic employee from Ratingen,
working under Gunther Wohlfromm,
If You don't mind and not too busy, please contact me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], its Lucas Wrobel formerly Sensormatic
Poland - Warsaw, just found Your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andre Helberg wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I'm using Samba 3.0.5 with openldap as pdc
|
|
| smb.conf:
|
|unix password sync = yes
|passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %U
|
|
| log says:
|
| Aug 10 09:17:58 juwidc01 smbd[4720]: chgpasswd: Running
| as
Hi all,
I'm using Samba 3.0.5 with openldap as pdc
smb.conf:
unix password sync = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %U
log says:
Aug 10 09:17:58 juwidc01 smbd[4720]: chgpasswd: Running as root the
'passwd program' parameter *MUST* contain the string %u, and the given
string
So I'm trying to copy a file called Stuffit Standard 8.0.2 X
Installer.dmg from my Panther workstation to a Debian i386 server,
running Samba 3.0.2a as packaged under Debian.
There's plenty of disk space left, I'm looking at a folder full of
files with long names, some containing spaces. When
Hallo,
I have samba 3.04 on Solaris 9 platform with
smb.conf
use client driver = No
default devmode = No
default case = lower
case sensitive = No
preserve case = Yes
short preserve case = No
mangle case = No
mangling char = ~
hide dot files = Yes
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:29:36PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Please write this up in bugzilla, so we don't loose it.
The report is now registered as bug 1139
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi *
I encounter severe problems with changing ACL settings in Samba
3.0.2a after migrating users from NT PDC to LDAP-SAM.
I did not find anything about this in the mailing list yet.
However, I have no idea (if) what I am doing wrong here.
Although I can hardly believe that I am the first one to
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 05:28, Sebastian Hetze wrote:
Hi *
I encounter severe problems with changing ACL settings in Samba
3.0.2a after migrating users from NT PDC to LDAP-SAM.
I did not find anything about this in the mailing list yet.
However, I have no idea (if) what I am doing wrong
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please lend me some expertise...
Sure! See below:
RE: [Samba] Win95 Win98 - NOT WORKING - NT,2000, XP are ok (re
Printing is working fine for our Windows NT, 2000 and XP clients.
However, with windows 95 98, the print job gets
Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Possible Bug?? (was: Win95 Win98 - NOT WORKING -
NT,2000, XP are ok)
Please lend me some expertise...
Ok, I know suggesting a bug is a bit impolite, but I cannot find a solution
for
this and
none
Thanks for the suggestion Andrew, I was hopeful,
but removing the writeable made no difference.
Still prints from NT, 2000, XP but not from Win95, 98.
Any other ideas?
-peter.
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19/03/2003 07:05:29 PM
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the suggestion Raj.
I might try using an old backup copy of the conf file.
Don't know why this would work, but worth a shot anyway hey?
:-)
-peter.
Raj Saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19/03/2003 07:20:09 PM
Hi,
I am not running it that way but one thing you can do is probably
Please lend me some expertise...
Ok, I know suggesting a bug is a bit impolite, but I cannot find a solution for
this and
none of the helpful people who have responded have been able to help either...
If I come off sounding a bit short it's just because I've tried many things to
get these
older
Hey all,
I've been fighting a samba share/unmount problem for several days now and may
have found a bug in the connect/disconnect code.
Basically, it seems that while everything claims to free the connection to the
share, it doesn't actually happen. This is me closing ALL windows to the
Well, I think I partially found out why this is acting strangely. I've
tried this on both samba 2.2.5 and 2.2.6rc4. The file handles work a little
differently between kernel 2.2 and kernel 2.4.
On kernel 2.2, when you access a directory, you get a single CWD open
handle (from LSOF 4.47):
Hello everyone,
I
think I have discovered a bug in the alpha20 release of samba 3.0. Here is what I did/discovered:
-- Created a new user
account on a Windows NT 4.0 PDC
-- Created a user
account on a linux machine with the same username
-- ran "getent passwd" and compared
the
I've set up Samba 2.2.5 on Linux 2.4.19-rc3 as a NT
PDC. After a bit of banging I got my Win2K clients to connect to it, but my
portable running Win95 just won't log on.
It keeps telling "The domain password you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon
server has been denied".
But
Kristyan Osborne wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 16:14
To: Kristyan Osborne
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Possible bug!!
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Kristyan Osborne wrote:
I'm using samba head cvs
43 matches
Mail list logo
