this is the case:
serverA [ CentOs 5.6 kernel 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.centos.plus, Samba ver. 3.5.21 ]
serverB [ CentOS 5.6 kernel 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5.centos.plus, Samba ver.
3.6.6-0.129.el5 ]
clientA [ WindowsXP ]
clientB [ WindowsXP ]
The serverA shares via Samba the resource [test]
[global]
is CTDB the solution?
2013/2/25 Vincenzo De Sanctis vincenzo.desanc...@gmail.com:
this is the case:
serverA [ CentOs 5.6 kernel 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.centos.plus, Samba ver.
3.5.21 ]
serverB [ CentOS 5.6 kernel 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5.centos.plus, Samba ver.
3.6.6-0.129.el5 ]
clientA [ WindowsXP
Hello All, I'm new here so I expect to learn a lot using this mail list.
Let's directly to my problem.
I have here 2 servers, one running Apache + php5 + Symfony, and other server
with Samba and nfs.
The web-server mount the data from the samba-server by nfs. there are
developers that
I think this is not so much samba related. Can't you just manage to make
the webserver user a member of a group, which samba users accessing the
files would also be member of ? Then you could only set the setgid bit on
directories, and that would do the trick.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:32:34 -0300,
is to force EVERYONE to access the filesystem with samba
no matter if they have direct access to the server bacuse it will maintain
consistency
--- On Wed, 9/10/08, François Legal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: François Legal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba + NFS + APACHE + PHP5
Alexander Gelf schrieb:
Attached.
You may want to experiment with these options:
# Most people will find that this option gives better performance.
# See the chapter 'Samba performance issues' in the Samba HOWTO Collection
# and the manual pages for details.
# You may want to add the
I have the following network configuration:
Server
FreeBSD 6.2
P4 3Ghz, 1GB RAM
Samba 3.0.24 (options: WITH_ADS, WITH_PAM, WITH_SENDFILE, WITH_UTMP,
WITH_WINBIND)
Standard FreeBSD NFS Server
Adaptec 2410SA controller with 4 drives running RAID5
Broadcom GigE
Client
Alexander Gelf schrieb:
I have the following network configuration:
Server
FreeBSD 6.2
P4 3Ghz, 1GB RAM
Samba 3.0.24 (options: WITH_ADS, WITH_PAM, WITH_SENDFILE, WITH_UTMP,
WITH_WINBIND)
Standard FreeBSD NFS Server
Adaptec 2410SA controller with 4 drives running RAID5
Attached.
AG
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Alexander Gelf schrieb:
I have the following network configuration:
Server
FreeBSD 6.2
P4 3Ghz, 1GB RAM
Samba 3.0.24 (options: WITH_ADS, WITH_PAM, WITH_SENDFILE,
WITH_UTMP, WITH_WINBIND)
Standard FreeBSD NFS Server
Adaptec 2410SA
Hi!
I have this linux box running Fedora 3 which mounts a NFS directory and inturn,
exports this mounted directory to Windows clients using Samba.
Everything works fine till I upgraded the box to Fedora 4. The error message
from the Windows client says path not found when I try clicking on
Jason,
The private and samba configuration files are on the local disk on the
Solaris machine. Particularly in /opt/csw/*. The only thing NFS mounted
is /export from Machine A, which contains project folders and user
directories. I am currently contemplating putting Samba on Machine A,
seeing as
I was trolling around on the lists, and noticed that there were a few
people who had issues with making Samba share directories which happend
to be NFS mounts. That is, on Machine A, I am exporting (via
NFS) /export, and on Machine B, I have mounted MachineA:/export
to /export on this machine.
Torey,
We used a similar configuration for quite some time. Are your Samba
binaries (in particular, the private directory) on a local disk, or an
NFS mount? We were trying to run Samba from an NFS mount, to share out
other NFS mounts. It would not work unless the Samba binaries were on a
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 04:13, Terry Bowling wrote:
I'm running:
Fedora Core 2 (2.6.6.1-435)
Samba 3.0.3-5
My shared (raid1 mirror) data directory is:
/dev/md3 (hda6,hdc6) mounted as Ext3 to /sites
This is shared to 300 users as an nfs mount point to their Digital Unix
workstations as
Just wanted you to know that this problem was solved by rebooting one
of the nodes in our NFS fileservercluster. Since the user claimed one of
his fellow-workers (with his home on the same node) was able to get locks
on the fs I dismissed this cause earlier.
What have we learned today? :)
/shoe
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Stefan Nordlander wrote:
Hi, I'm having problems with M$ Office files on an samba mounted fs.
Here's the deal.
Server A is an NFS server holding the homes. (Irix 6.5.14)
Server B is the Samba server
Hi, I'm having problems with M$ Office files on an samba mounted fs.
Here's the deal.
Server A is an NFS server holding the homes. (Irix 6.5.14)
Server B is the Samba server (Samba 2.2.2, kernel oplocks = no, Irix
6.5.14)
The homes are nfs-mounted on the Samba server (autofs), and all is well
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Stefan Nordlander wrote:
Hi, I'm having problems with M$ Office files on an samba mounted fs.
Here's the deal.
Server A is an NFS server holding the homes. (Irix 6.5.14)
Server B is the Samba server (Samba 2.2.2, kernel oplocks = no, Irix
6.5.14)
Hey, Joseph.
I don't know what OS you are using, I prefer to use home directories but
I tried one set at /opt/applix (automounted to the opt) drive and
mounted unde winnt as \\mfg\win_c. Worked perfectly fine with the size.
Win 95, 98, ME, 2000, XP. All behave the same way on this.
We're using a Samba machine as an SMB - NFS gateway. I.E.
actual file shares are via nfs, and Windows clients make requests via Samba.
There are virtual directories set up on the Samba machine for automounted
nfs shares. (There are a number of nfs servers, and there are a couple of
I have automounts for my shares. Under windows 98 it shows the proper
free space once you do a map. It is very similiar your part of the conf
file.
You might need to check how your automounts are working.
Chris Knadle wrote:
We're using a Samba machine as an SMB - NFS gateway. I.E.
21 matches
Mail list logo
