On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 11:49 +0200, Sandbox wrote:
Hi Guys,
Well I made a bad decision and installed Samba4 from zentyal repo, I would
like to upgrade it, is it enough to backup all files from %installation
folder%/private directory and then copy into the newly installed version's
private
On 9-8-2013 11:49, Sandbox wrote:
Hi Guys,
Well I made a bad decision and installed Samba4 from zentyal repo,
Why was that a bad decision? I have been looking at it and for certain
use cases it looks nice.
Regards,
Joop
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
Hi Guys,
Well I made a bad decision and installed Samba4 from zentyal repo, I would
like to upgrade it, is it enough to backup all files from %installation
folder%/private directory and then copy into the newly installed version's
private folder?
Thanks, Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Hi,
After ugrade samba (3.5.6) to 3.6.6 (debian wheezy), the command
smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U user show a message error :
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
Thanks,
Marcos.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hi
Is this possible? I see that the 4.0.6 directory structure is different,
so we can't just do a make install over what's already there.
Is there a method for using the latest stable release by upgrading, or
must we do a fresh install?
Cheers,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hi,
We are still running Samba 4 alpha 18 for our servers, its integrated with
postfix/dovecot, sugarcrm and a samba 3 fileserver.
All of these systems are virtual running on Proxmox. Now we are trying to
upgrade Samba 4 alpha 18 to a stable version. We are also running Ubuntu
server.
What
I'm experiencing the same/similar problem
the difference being it that ldap-backend users are ok, only
root fails with NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION
but I also get warnings, not sure if related
WARNING: The idmap backend option is deprecated
WARNING: The idmap uid option is deprecated
Hello,
I'm attempting to upgrade a server from Samba 3.0.33 to Samba 3.6.13.
I'm testing the upgrade on a virtual machine with the same set up and
data as the production server. My problem is that the SID to UID
mappings and permissions aren't carrying over to the new version.
Here's what I'm
From: Rodney Green rodgr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:27:57 -0400
My problem is that the SID to UID
mappings and permissions aren't carrying over to the new version.
(snip)
Current config (3.0.33):
[global]
workgroup = domain
(snip)
winbind separator = +
idmap uid
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:34 PM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com wrote:
From: Rodney Green rodgr...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:27:57 -0400
My problem is that the SID to UID
mappings and permissions aren't carrying over to the new version.
(snip)
Current config (3.0.33):
On 03/19/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:39 -0500, Cristian Saavedra wrote:
Hello
I'm upgrading to 4.0.4 as far as i remember the samba_upgradeprovision must
not be used, so i'm asking for the current upgrade procedure:
- configure samba 4.0.4
- make
-
On 03/20/2013 09:17 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 03/19/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:39 -0500, Cristian Saavedra wrote:
Hello
I'm upgrading to 4.0.4 as far as i remember the samba_upgradeprovision must
not be used, so i'm asking for the current upgrade
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 21:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 03/19/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:39 -0500, Cristian Saavedra wrote:
Hello
I'm upgrading to 4.0.4 as far as i remember the samba_upgradeprovision
must not be used, so i'm asking for the current
Hello
I'm upgrading to 4.0.4 as far as i remember the samba_upgradeprovision must not
be used, so i'm asking for the current upgrade procedure:
- configure samba 4.0.4
- make
- create current samba backup (just in case)
- killall samba process
- make install
- run samba
After that, the new
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:39 -0500, Cristian Saavedra wrote:
Hello
I'm upgrading to 4.0.4 as far as i remember the samba_upgradeprovision must
not be used, so i'm asking for the current upgrade procedure:
- configure samba 4.0.4
- make
- create current samba backup (just in case)
-
Hi @ all,
we use samba as a fileserver on CentOS and an OpenLDAP server on Ubuntu 10.04.
The samba server shared only files, so we can access with the win7 clients (and
OpenLDAP credentials) to the files on the linux environment.
So after upgrade we don't can connected us to the samba share.
We're having trouble with our samba PDC since the upgrade to 3.6.12. We've
got a standard smbpassword file using TDB and I;ve run tdbtool and
tdbbackup over the file and both report no errors.
The PDC will run for several hours handling hundreds of users and will
then catastrophically fail with
Hi Nico
Tried with make clean and with a fresh build from the 4.0.3 source. Yielded
same issue.
Regards
Chris
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Chris Lewis cle...@inview.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Chris Lewis cle...@inview.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment.
I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs,
patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install.
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 13:11 +, Chris Lewis wrote:
Hello,
Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment.
I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs,
patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install.
# samba-tool
Hello,
Today I tried to upgrade from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 on my test environment.
I patched the source with the diffs patch-4.0.0-4.0.1.diffs,
patch-4.0.1-4.0.2.diffs, patch-4.0.2-4.0.3.diffs , then make, make install.
# samba-tool dbcheck
Checking 807 objects
Not fixing
Hi
Related to my previous posting on joining win7 to a domain with samba-3.6.6
(which I finally managed to do!)
With Centos5 one has the option of installing either Samba which is 3.0.33
or Samba3x which is 3.6.6 with the latest updates to centos5.9
My own server was set up with samba3x and hence
On 02/05/2013 12:08 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Hi Dale
that worked, thanks.
Just to clarify the * means everything else, right?
That's how I understand it. On the sites I visited while gathering this
information, no one seemed to know why it is required, only that
everything started
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:56:26PM -0600, Dale Schroeder
(d...@briannassaladdressing.com) wrote:
On 02/05/2013 12:08 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Hi Dale
[snip snap snip]
Sorry that I don't have any concrete reasons as to the why of any
of these things.
;-) love that line.
Jobst
Hi Dale
that worked, thanks.
Just to clarify the * means everything else, right?
Cause now I am getting (only once)
[2013/02/04 07:50:48.519114, 1]
winbindd/idmap.c:288(idmap_init_named_domain) no backend defined for idmap
config BUILTIN
One strange side effect ... I have never had to
Hi,
@Nico
I fixed smbldap-tools, I have installed the package and correct
smb.conf, the new file is
[global]
workgroup = GIS
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://192.0.200.2/
map untrusted to domain = Yes
log level = 4
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%U
Sorry for previous mail, I click on send to error.
Hi,
@Nico
I fixed smbldap-tools, I have installed the package and correct
smb.conf, the new file is
[global]
workgroup = GIS
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://192.0.200.2/
map untrusted to domain = Yes
log level = 4
Jobst,
The following works for me in 3.6.x. Modify to match your criteria.
idmap config * : backend= tdb
idmap config * : range = low - high
idmap config DOMAIN : default = Yes
idmap config DOMAIN : backend = idmap backend
idmap
Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia,
thanks for reply. Path for smbldap is correct. Other log file have
2013/01/25 17:20:13.974204, 1] auth/server_info.c:386(samu_to_SamInfo3)
The primary group domain
sid(S-1-5-21-3564791867-1010203101-2143723903-513) does not match the
domain
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Fabrizio Monti thefanta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia,
thanks for reply. Path for smbldap is correct. Other log file have
Then you have a manually built and installed smbldap-tools, and you
should probably replace it with the one from Red Hat or your
On 16:55:05 wrote Fabrizio Monti:
Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia,
thanks for reply. Path for smbldap is correct. Other log file have
2013/01/25 17:20:13.974204, 1]
auth/server_info.c:386(samu_to_SamInfo3) The primary group domain
sid(S-1-5-21-3564791867-1010203101-2143723903-513) does not match the
Hi.
I am getting loads of errors no backend defined for idmap config MYDOMAIN
after I upgraded from 3.5 - 3.6 a couple of days ago.
I read
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_3.6_Features_added/changed
and did what
man smb.conf
suggested:
idmap config MYDOMAIN : backend = tdb
Hello to all,
is the first time I write to this mailing list, I wanted to ask you a hand
about an upgrade of samba I did on a centos 5.5 i386 with kernel
2.6.18-308.24.1.el5, which I updated with yum samba3x-3.3. 8-0.52.el5_5.2
bringing it to samba3x-3.6.6-0.129.el5. Now I can not put the computer
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Fabrizio Monti thefanta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to all,
is the first time I write to this mailing list, I wanted to ask you a hand
about an upgrade of samba I did on a centos 5.5 i386 with kernel
2.6.18-308.24.1.el5, which I updated with yum samba3x-3.3.
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 12:07 +, Nitin Thakur wrote:
how about i get rid of secrets file all together?
You can delete secrets.tdb and secrets.ldb if either exists.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba
is it possible to run samba with ad without winbind?
Nitin Thakur
---Original Message---
From: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Sent: 6/9/2012 20:42
To: nitintha...@hotmail.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba upgrade problem with ADS
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 12:07 +
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 01:41 +, Nitin Thakur wrote:
is it possible to run samba with ad without winbind?
It isn't recommended, and won't help the issue you are having.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer,
how about i get rid of secrets file all together?
Nitin Thakur
---Original Message---
From: Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org
Sent: 5/9/2012 0:26
To: nitintha...@hotmail.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba upgrade problem with ADS
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:10 -0400, Nitin
hi gurus
My samba upgrade woes: -
I have to run 2 instances of samba one for dev and one for UAT. both the
instances are giving me hard time after the upgrade.
One instance keeps giving me following error: -
connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to open the domain client session
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:10 -0400, Nitin Thakur wrote:
hi gurus
My samba upgrade woes: -
I have to run 2 instances of samba one for dev and one for UAT. both the
instances are giving me hard time after the upgrade.
One instance keeps giving me following error
Hey,
I am looking to upgrade my v4 installation to Beta6 (well, master - to
overcome the mem leak mentioned on the wiki). The end goal is to be on
Beta6 with the Samba4 on a new host in a remote location - but preserve
the same domain, accounts, SID's, etc.
I see on the wiki it mentions that I
Hi,
You are missing some header files on your system (bsd/string.h). Find the
package that contains them in your bsd package repository assuming you are
using some *BSD unix variant.
br,
Quinn
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:36 PM, sandy.napo...@eccmg.cupet.cu wrote:
Hello list, I need update my
Hello list, I need update my samba, I run firtly ./configure.developer,
and when I run make I get this message
123/3913] Compiling lib/replace/replace.c
In file included from ../lib/replace/replace.c:26:
../lib/replace/replace.h:112:24: error: bsd/string.h: No such file or
directory
Upgrading from 3.5.15 to 3.6.6 failed.
Looks a bit like Bug 8235:
[2012/07/04 09:02:38.341747, 0, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
lib/charcnv.c:543(convert_string_talloc)
Conversion error: Illegal multibyte sequence()
[2012/07/04
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:49:49 -0400
Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Upgrading from 3.5.15 to 3.6.6 failed.
Looks a bit like Bug 8235:
[2012/07/04 09:02:38.341747, 0, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
From the smbd.log level 10 log there is this:
=
[2012/07/04 10:41:28.146531, 5, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
printing/nt_printing_migrate_internal.c:54(rename_file_with_suffix)
moved '/var/lib/samba/ntdrivers.tdb' to '/var/lib/samba/ntdrivers.tdb.bak'
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:58:12 -0400
Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
From the smbd.log level 10 log there is this:
=
[2012/07/04 10:41:28.146531, 5, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
printing/nt_printing_migrate_internal.c:54(rename_file_with_suffix)
Thank you. Done. Bug 9026.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Just to note that ntprinters.tdb does not fail tdbbackup validation
and a backup/restore of it does not resolve the issue.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, David Disseldorp dd...@suse.de wrote:
ntdrivers.tdb is ok, it appears to be ntprinters.tdb which is processed
afterwards
--
To unsubscribe
Hi guys I have strange case.
One network is based on Samba 3.0.x + LDAP PDC. Centos 5.8 i386.
This server have the mail: dovecot-ldap+postfix.
Everything is working good, my clients are Windows XP Pro, roaming
profiles, etc.
I have receive my first Win7 machine and I need to update samba to
Thank you Dale.
Actually I did this by importing smbpasswd with
pdbedit -i smbpasswd:smbpasswd
And it works in the sense that my users can map a drive with their same
credentials.
But I have something else to consider.
The old server was a domain master and so I have some win XP machines
On 05/06/2012 10:14 AM, Bill Szkotnicki wrote:
Hi,
I want to transfer all of my users from an older version of samba to a
new one here.
The old version is 3.0.28 and the file with user passwords
is /etc/samba/smbpasswd
and the new version is 3.6.5 and there does not seem to be that file
Hi,
I want to transfer all of my users from an older version of samba to a
new one here.
The old version is 3.0.28 and the file with user passwords
is /etc/samba/smbpasswd
and the new version is 3.6.5 and there does not seem to be that file
anymore.
I think the user info is now in
Very intersting, Then I can only upgrade one times on month?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Samba] upgrade
From:Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
Date:Tue, May 1, 2012 5:29 am
To: sandy.napo...@eccmg.cupet.cu
Cc: samba
.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Samba] upgrade
From: Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, May 1, 2012 5:29 am
To: sandy.napo...@eccmg.cupet.cu
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Hi
On 1 May 2012 00:24, sandy.napo...@eccmg.cupet.cu wrote:
Hello list, Iam running every day git pull for update my samba-master,
after I follow the step upgrading-samba4, and everything is ok, but I will
want know how I can see if my samba4 is upgrade succeful. thereis some
log. some
Hello list, Iam running every day git pull for update my samba-master,
after I follow the step upgrading-samba4, and everything is ok, but I will
want know how I can see if my samba4 is upgrade succeful. thereis some
log. some aplication that say me it, in this moment how I can know if my
samba4
Hello,
For a long time I've been running Samba 3.5.10 as a domain controller on RH
Enterprise 5, with Windows 7 clients. Everything has worked fine. But since I
recently upgraded to Samba 3.6.4, I have a persistent problem with users not
being able to login to the client machines
the domain name would have this effect
though.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Evans
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:14 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] After Samba upgrade, trust
Hi Gregory,
I am completely ignorant of interaction with likewise.
But I assume (from the logs) that you have samba's winbindd
running. I also don't know about the lwicompat_v4 backend
that you configured.
What you should know thought is that a domain placeholder ALL
is not used for the default
Thanks for the suggestion, but no joy
Below is my [global]
workgroup = endace
realm = ad.DOMAIN.COM
server string = %h server
wins server = 10.0.32.2
dns proxy = no
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
security = ADS
encrypt passwords = true
passdb backend =
Hi
I'm running CentOS 6.2 with samba-3.5.10-114 , and LikewiseOpen 6.1 .
How do I fix these errors ?
Mar 16 20:25:43 nzhmlfpr05 winbindd[2556]: [2012/03/16
20:25:43.639871, 0] winbindd/idmap_tdb.c:287(idmap_tdb_open_db)
Mar 16 20:25:43 nzhmlfpr05 winbindd[2556]: Upgrade of IDMAP_VERSION
from
I saw this on CentOS 6 with winbind, not LikewiseOpen. The problem is
that it expects configuration options to be present that are flagged as having
(sane) defaults in the smb.conf man page. Once I added the following options
for winbind to my smb.conf this problem went away:
idmap
Hi folks
I am writing to this list because Google was unable to provide me with a
solution for my problem
(neither did the samba list archives ; as far as I can see).
I know that the topic The trust relationship between this workstation
and the primary domain failed.
is not unknown and a lot
On 10/06/2011 10:36 PM, Louis Kabo wrote:
having a problem upgrading a samba installation version 3.0.28 on a
FreeBSD 7.x server. I use samba as a PDC with roaming profiles and user
shares.
I noticed that none of the local profiles loaded, instead creating a new
roaming profile username.V2
Louis,
There are numerous changes (adds, deletes, and defaults) to smb.conf
between the two versions you have listed.
The one that may be causing your smbpasswd problem is the default passdb
backend has changed.
If you wish to continue using smbpasswd instead of the default tdb, you
have to
Hello,
having a problem upgrading a samba installation version 3.0.28 on a
FreeBSD 7.x server. I use samba as a PDC with roaming profiles and user
shares.
I have to upgrade it to allow Windows 7 Pro workstations to join the
domain.
I was able to build the binaries sucessfully and install them,
Dear
I have upgraded from 3.5.11 to 3.6.0
in old version, Server was connected to an Active Directory and no
problems occurs.
when restarting winbind :
Sep 19 01:17:34 onesys-samba winbindd[4818]: [2011/09/19
01:17:34.326691, 0] winbindd/winbindd_util.c:635(init_domain_list)
Sep 19 01:17:34
Hello,
We recently upgraded domain controllers to 2008 and were forced to
update samba-3.0.33 to samba3x-3.5.4. The upgrade path was not just
update but rather erase samba and then install samba3x. Then I copied
the files under old config /etc/samba/* back to new install including
secrets.tdb.
Hi
I am running Samba version 3.0.10 on a Sun E450, could you tell me if samba
upgrade to 3.4.2 or higher is possible.
Thanks
Regards
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Aplogies I should also mention I am running Solaris 5.6
-Original Message-
From: Force, Steven
Sent: 01 July 2011 11:42
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: upgrade options
Hi
I am running Samba version 3.0.10 on a Sun E450, could you tell me if samba
upgrade to 3.4.2 or higher
Hello Timur and Samba friends,
I have done what you suggested. However group_mapping.tdb is renamed to
group_mapping.tdb.upgraded again. To me it looks like some update
mechanism cannot finalise and got stuck at some point. Any help to
overcome this problem is still welcome!
On Mon, Jun 20,
I'd try to rename that *.upgraded file to the normal one, possibly
preserving a copy somewhere.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Willy Offermans
wi...@offermans.rompen.nlwrote:
Dear Samba friends,
I have recently upgraded from Samba 3.0.36 to Samba 3.5.6. After upgrade I
encounter the
I just upgraded my samba to my dist's version:
(3.5.7) and got a message:
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
Ishtar smbd[8204]: Share 'IPC$' has wide links and unix extensions enabled.
These parameters are incompatible. Wide links will be disabled
Dear Samba friends,
I have recently upgraded from Samba 3.0.36 to Samba 3.5.6. After upgrade I
encounter the following error in log.smbd:
[2011/06/03 10:09:43, 0] smbd/server.c:1119(main) smbd version 3.5.6 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010
[2011/06/03
Thank you for the replies to my question I asked about upgrading samba4
I am having a new problem and will post a new thread on it.
On Wed, 11 May 2011 12:02:00 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Hello,
On 09/05/2011 19:52, de...@podoll.com wrote:
I have a install of samba4 that I have been using
Hello,
On 09/05/2011 19:52, de...@podoll.com wrote:
I have a install of samba4 that I have been using on my home network
for testing with one PDC and BDC on the local network and a 3rd BDC
located on another network with IPSEC tunnel between the two
networks. The problem I have is all 3
I have a install of samba4 that I have been using on my home network
for testing with one PDC and BDC on the local network and a 3rd BDC
located on another network with IPSEC tunnel between the two networks.
The problem I have is all 3 servers are running different versions on
the samba4 code
If the install's are not too old just update you git tree with git
pull. Then do this from your root tree, you can no longer build from
the source4 directory:
make clean
./configure.developer --disable-s3build
make
Then make a backup copy of /usr/local/samba
remove the following directiries
rm
Am 08.02.2011 20:24, schrieb Bernd Glueckert:
dear list members,
i have a 3.0.37 server running fine but hardware goes down so i must
change the server. the new server is there, gentoo with samba 3.4.9.
last time i have done this sever exchange, i have copied the *conf and
*tdb files
: Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2011 13:08
An: Bernd Glueckert
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Upgrade vom 3.0.37 to 3.4.9
Am 08.02.2011 20:24, schrieb Bernd Glueckert:
dear list members,
i have a 3.0.37 server running fine but hardware goes down so i must
change the server. the new server
Am 04.05.2011 14:07, schrieb Daniel Müller:
You should follow these steps and you are on and running:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/upgrades.html
Thanks, was no problem anyway. Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
If you have trouble accessing a machine, are you able to access it from
a windows command line with
net use \\SERVERNAME
or
net use \\SERVERIP
I had upgraded one of my servers from 3.0.x to 3.4.x. I probably missed
something in the compile. Normally an XP/Win7 client should be
Greetings,
I just did a major upgrade to our Samba infrastructure.
I previously had a domain controller and share running 3.0.33 (on one
box, one samba instance)
I set up a new domain controller running 3.5.8, made that the PDC for
our domain, and changed the (now former) domain controller
The same happend to me.
But I didn't have the time to analize the problem. I solve it by changing
the name of the server. Same ip, but new name and everything works now.
It would be great to know if there is another workaround.
Did you keep the sid of the pdc after the change?
Did you use ldap?
The new DC has a new time. We do use LDAP. Which SID are you
referring to? The local SID is new on the new DC, but the domain sids
are the same.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:23 PM, gu...@lorenzutti.com.ar wrote:
The same happend to me.
But I didn't have the time to analize the problem. I
Did you update the schema on the ldap? Maybe you should. Im right know
doing it. I don't know how many changes are in the schema between 3.0.33
and 3.5.x. Im migrating from 3.0.24 to 3.2.X and if I don't upgrade the
schema the password must change time dosen't work.
What do you mean about the dc
Hi there.
I have a few dozens domain controllers in samba 3.0.24 and Im in the
middle of the process of migrating them to 3.2.5. But know I realize that
they are a few problems with the password policys.
With the 3.0.24 I can force a user to change the password on the next
login and I check this
Hi
I had to upgrade samba because we upgrade DC windows to 2008.
My current samba version is 3.5.4-0.70.el5 .
I'm using RHE Server release 5.4
After the upgrade this message started to appear:
Feb 27 20:52:26 mailgate winbindd[316]: [2011/02/27 20:52:26.682422, 0]
dear list members,
i have a 3.0.37 server running fine but hardware goes down so i must
change the server. the new server is there, gentoo with samba 3.4.9.
last time i have done this sever exchange, i have copied the *conf and
*tdb files together with /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow /etc/group
Hi all.
Don’t know if this has be asked before, but since I find many results
about “processing delayed initial logon reply for client” but none
that’s solves my problem I’m asking here.
Due to need of adding Windows 7 machines to our domain, I must upgrade
our good old samba 3.0.14+openldap
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:35:15PM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
After upgrading samba from 3.4.3 to 3.5.4 (during upgrade opensuse
11.2 to 11.3) wince3.0 client does not see any files/dirs in the
user share; The config is the same as worked with 3.4.3.
Can you send a wireshark trace of that
Hi!
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Attached:
ce-samba.pcap.gz - gzipped wireshark trace ce-samba
ce-windows-pcap - gzipped wireshark trace ce - windowsxp
Thanks a lot
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:22:53AM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
Hi!
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Attached:
ce-samba.pcap - wireshark trace ce-samba
ce-windows-pcap
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:55:57AM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Attached:
ce-samba.pcap.gz - gzipped wireshark trace ce-samba
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:55:57AM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Hi all!
After upgrading samba from 3.4.3 to 3.5.4 (during upgrade opensuse 11.2
to 11.3) wince3.0 client does not see any files/dirs in the user share;
The config is the same as worked with 3.4.3.
Connecting with smblclient or windows from different machine still works
as expected.
Hi, Volker!
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Volker Lendecke
volker.lende...@sernet.de wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote:
20101026:
AFFECTS: users of net/samba35
AUTHOR: Timur Bakeyev ti...@freebsd.org
This is the latest stable release of the
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:56:55AM -0800, Chernoguz, Inessa wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current
version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to
upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any
problem with
The key advantages of the Solaris provided version is that
- someone already did the compilation work
- ZFS support is included (this is backported by Sun and not
included with 3.0.x source code from samba.)
- nsswitch support is also enabled
The big problems I had with Sun's version
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
