On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to his
homedirectory
Same change occured here when upgrading from 2.2.7a to the 3.0.0 release.
--
To unsubscribe from this
I see this problem too. I thought that I was going crazy.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:14:36AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:26, Derek T. Yarnell wrote:
I see this problem too. I thought that I was going crazy.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:14:36AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
Guys,
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
- John T.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:26, Derek T. Yarnell wrote:
I see this problem too. I thought that I was going crazy.
On Fri,
, September 26, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Chris Smith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] valid users = %S in rc4
Guys,
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
- John T.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Chris Smith wrote
, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Chris Smith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] valid users = %S in rc4
Guys,
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
- John T.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday
security for home directories
Robert
-Original Message-
From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Petty, Robert
Cc: Chris Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] valid users = %S in rc4
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Petty
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:04, John H Terpstra wrote:
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
So this is a purposeful change in behavior then? With 2.2.x one could have
browseable = Yes and valid users = %S.
Chris
--
To
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:28, John H Terpstra wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Petty, Robert wrote:
No, I haven't filed a bug report...
The key part of my message was:
Since nobody's home directory was / it would open the root
directory
I have changed it since I immediately
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 04:04:54PM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
Guys,
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
You shouldn't need to do that. If it worked with 2.2.8a it
should work the same with 3.0. I'll look into it asap.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:28:00AM -0600, Petty, Robert wrote:
No, I haven't filed a bug report...
The key part of my message was:
Since nobody's home directory was / it would open the root
directory
I have changed it since I immediately recognized it as a security issue.
The
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 12:47:42PM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 12:04, John H Terpstra wrote:
The homes share should be set to be browsable = No.
Do NOT set the valid users = %S on the homes share.
So this is a purposeful change in behavior then? With 2.2.x one
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:14:36AM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:15, Hannu Tikka wrote:
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to his
homedirectory
Same change occured here when
After upgrading rc2 - rc4 (suse binary packages)
line 'valid users = %S' in [homes] section prevents user getting to his
homedirectory
in logfile smbd says:
[2003/09/25 15:07:59, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(384)
user '' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share
14 matches
Mail list logo
