Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-14 Thread Dragan Krnic
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:43:40 John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: In another thread John Terpstra rightly positions reiserfs somewhere between ext2 and ext3, which means ahead of ext3. And for waht it is worth, even though I found ReiserFS the poorest performing, I

Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-14 Thread John H Terpstra
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:43:40 John H Terpstra wrote: On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: In another thread John Terpstra rightly positions reiserfs somewhere between ext2 and ext3, which means ahead of ext3. And for waht it is worth, even

Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-13 Thread John H Terpstra
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dragan Krnic wrote: I have had issues with ReiserFS2.x, but we really need ACLs, so until some distro supports ACLs on ReiserFS, it's not coming near my file servers (mail/news/web maybe). Thanks for moderation and additional answers to Simo, Buchan. I might be a

[Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Dragan Krnic
ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. A dangerous misconception. The best file system around, ReiserFS, can handle ACLs and EAs just beautifully after you enable the features in the kernel, as I learnt from Mr Deschner from SuSE. If you use SuSE Linux 8.1 look at these

Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:47, Dragan Krnic wrote: ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. A dangerous misconception. The best file system around, ReiserFS, can handle ACLs and EAs just beautifully after you enable the features in the kernel, Very nice to know, I was

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Michael Heironimus
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:58:15PM -0600, Corey Hart wrote: We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the different journaling

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Chris Smith
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 16:58, Corey Hart wrote: We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the different journaling file systems

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Simo Sorce
Have you ever tried ACLs with reiserfs? Any opinion on ACL support in reiserfs? Simo. On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 16:07, Chris Smith wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 16:58, Corey Hart wrote: We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online.

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Chris Smith
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:22, Simo Sorce wrote: Have you ever tried ACLs with reiserfs? No. Didn't even know that it was possible. Any opinion on ACL support in reiserfs? If it truly works I would like to try it. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the

Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Jim McDonough
Sime Sorce wrote: ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. JFS does have acls now, even uses the same libs as ext3 and XFS. See http://bestbits.acl.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:

AW: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Dragan Krnic
ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. A dangerous misconception. The best file system around, ReiserFS, can handle ACLs and EAs just beautifully after you enable the features in the kernel, Very nice to know, I was aware about EAs not of ACLs, are tehy in

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Jim McDonough
Simo Sorce wrote: ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. JFS does have acls, and it even uses the same libs as XFS and ext3. See http://acl.bestbits.at -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Jay Ts
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 10:33:17AM -0500, Jim McDonough wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. JFS does have acls, and it even uses the same libs as XFS and ext3. See http://acl.bestbits.at Also, be aware that these filesystems can be

Re: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Message: 18 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dragan Krnic) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Simo Sorce' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: [Samba] File Systems - Which one to use? Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 16:54:48

Re: [samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 16:33, Jim McDonough wrote: Simo Sorce wrote: ext3 and XFS have ACLs while, afaik, JFS and reiserFS do not. JFS does have acls, and it even uses the same libs as XFS and ext3. See http://acl.bestbits.at wow, very nice. -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec

[Samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-12 Thread Dragan Krnic
I have had issues with ReiserFS2.x, but we really need ACLs, so until some distro supports ACLs on ReiserFS, it's not coming near my file servers (mail/news/web maybe). Thanks for moderation and additional answers to Simo, Buchan. I might be a bit overoptimistic about reiserfs. On the other

[samba] File Systems - Which one to use?

2002-12-11 Thread Corey Hart
We are looking at implementing a Linux box running samba in the near future with about 1TB of disk online. The purpose of this box will be for basic file and printer sharing needs. I am doing research on the different journaling file systems avaible in RH 7.3 and up (ext3, reiserFS, and JFS) and